covcity4life
Well-Known Member
seriously man stop! hes a striker, if he deserves to play he needs to be upfront! in a 3 or a 2 or as lone striker!
seriously man stop! hes a striker, if he deserves to play he needs to be upfront! in a 3 or a 2 or as lone striker!Any need?
I would play him because he deserves to be on the pitch, but I cannot see where he would fit.
I will see who we sign
It won't be suggesting Biamou plays right midfield though, funnily enough.
seriously man stop! hes a striker, if he deserves to play he needs to be upfront! in a 3 or a 2 or as lone striker!
I would put him up front normally, but he won't score goals spearheading an attack. I like him but he would be dogshit in that out and out strikers role.
You play him behind a striker then where do you put Andreu? Andreu is probably one of our best players so it's pretty hard to drop him out of there.
Biamou should play, but it isn't easy to find a place for him in the team. Putting him right mid might look stupid (it may well be), but I honestly don't know where he fits into that team otherwise.
he doesnt deserve to play if he doesnt scoreI would put him up front normally, but he won't score goals spearheading an attack. I like him but he would be dogshit in that out and out strikers role.
You play him behind a striker then where do you put Andreu? Andreu is probably one of our best players so it's pretty hard to drop him out of there.
Biamou should play, but it isn't easy to find a place for him in the team. Putting him right mid might look stupid (it may well be), but I honestly don't know where he fits into that team otherwise.
You play him in the same place he was on Saturday but tweak it so the wingers are cutting in a bit more.
You are getting to a Dongo level of nonsense.
i would go with grimmer upfront. he did alot for us last year and deserves to play
Why is it so ridiculous and less plausible than any of our other strikers playing that role.How can you say I am talking nonsense and then come out with that?
Having Biamou as the focal point of our attack is absolutely ridiculous.
he doesnt deserve to play if he doesnt score
if you want him in team you go 4-4-2 like last year
i personally think it can work if like nick said we have pacey wingers like allasani and jones to get up in support quickly when he does manage to hold it up, or get more crosses in for him
1 game in, i wouldnt worry too much just yet. He will probably play again saturday, lets hope he adapts more to the lone role.
out wide he isnt fast enough dribble or technical enough passer to unlock defences. only thing he could do would be win headers wide like vincente.
How can you say I am talking nonsense and then come out with that?
Having Biamou as the focal point of our attack is absolutely ridiculous.
So for those that saw the game: assuming we don't sign a Chaplin or similar, should Hiwula play through the middle or down the wings in a front 3?
Towards the end of the game he was cutting in a lot more like I think he was meant to. First half he was pretty much stood on the touchline for most of it apart from when he had the chance but in the second half his movement was a bit better.
I'd try him on the right or left but ideally tell him not to be so wide and out of the game and to come in and play off Biamou / Andreu.
Whoever is playing on the opposite side to where the ball is should be bombing on to the far post as well.
I would put Hiwula in the middle. I think he will score plenty of goals for us this season.So for those that saw the game: assuming we don't sign a Chaplin or similar, should Hiwula play through the middle or down the wings in a front 3?
I'm talking about from how it was setup on Saturday when it worked quite well and would be even better with a couple of tweaks.
He isn't there as a striker on his own and then the midfield miles away.
Like I said, getting as bad as Dongo when he would go on and on and hadn't actually seen what he was going on about so looked stupid.
Why is it so ridiculous and less plausible than any of our other strikers playing that role.
A lot: a large number; a great dealthe guy who didnt rate jacob murphy wants biamou on right wing
explains alot!
Again like i said, what evidence do you have that JCH/ Hiwula would be able to play that role better than him?As Nick would say, have you ever been to a game and watched Biamou play?
He has a lot of good qualities, but clinical in front of goal is not one of them.
I've seen Biamou play many times. He cannot play as the focal point of an attack.
What is so stupid about that? You are literally arguing for the sake of it.
Again like i said, what evidence do you have that JCH/ Hiwula would be able to play that role better than him?
A lot: a large number; a great deal
Allot: give or apportion to someone
Alot: not a word
A year of seeing Biamou play for us in a lower league tells me all I need to know about his strengths and weaknesses. We should be trying other people in that role.
As it stands what you are trying to say is replacing McNulty with Biamou is sufficient.
How is it? Biamou played a completely different role to what McNulty did last season.
Slut:your mum!A lot: a large number; a great deal
Allot: give or apportion to someone
Alot: not a word
:emoji_laughing:Slut:your mum!
Jk
I think you are too busy to try and quote my posts to have a go instead of actually reading them properly.
People want Biamou to play as the highest player on the pitch in their selections, that was where McNulty was last season wasn't it?
I'd say he can do both but it depends what's happening around him e.g.. I think he'd do ok in a front 2 with Biamou or JCH - when he went clean through, he was right of centre with classic strikers movement, pulling slightly wider to create a gap and then keeping himself onside. However if you still wanted Andreu in there then the rest of the 3 midfield would have to be quite defensive, probably at the cost of any natural width, or you go 3 at the back.So for those that saw the game: assuming we don't sign a Chaplin or similar, should Hiwula play through the middle or down the wings in a front 3?
You do realise that players don't just stand on a spot and they have different roles don't you? He wasn't playing the McNulty role or even trying to. He was there for the other 3 around him to play off.
I think you are too busy trying to sound as if you have a clue when you are digging more and more to be like Dongo...
Desperately weak response, and not really relevant to what I was saying at all really. You can say I'm digging all you want, but you are the one quoting me on every thread trying to have a pop in more regular desperation.
Whilst you have overplayed the 'I went to the game and you didn't card' you've lost sight of the overall point I was trying to make anyway.
Desperately weak response, and not really relevant to what I was saying at all really. You can say I'm digging all you want, but you are the one quoting me on every thread trying to have a pop in more regular desperation.
Whilst you have overplayed the 'I went to the game and you didn't card' you've lost sight of the overall point I was trying to make anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?