If we hadn’t made mistakes we probably still lose both. Disregarding the mistakes Leeds were by far the better team and Ipswich had the better of the game today.It’s not the results ffs, it’s the way in which we gifted both teams chances and goals. It could have been 5 against Leeds and the goals we gifted today were absolutely shocking. If we hadn’t have made stupid mistakes we might have picked up 2 results. Stop making out it’s because both Leeds and Ipswich are as good as Barcelona
nothing to do with resources, just bad tactics, these player are doing what they're told by Frank and being negative and sitting back is by design. Why not get on the front foot like against watford and put some pressure on defenders, like teams do to us, or maybe we're the only team with shit cb's and no midfield? Elite tactician?? hmmmmm not too sure.What’s your point?
Unless we get promoted we’re never going to be in a position to expect a result against the likes of Leeds and Ipswich, the difference in resources is massive.
Just some stupid posts in here today
Leeds were otherwise wasteful and Dovin was on form, they needed the gifts to score.If we hadn’t made mistakes we probably still lose both. Disregarding the mistakes Leeds were by far the better team and Ipswich had the better of the game today.
You don’t get any points for a spirited loss.
I’m pretty sure the 2 players who combined for their 4th goal have a combined transfer value not far off £40m. You can claim real resources don’t make a difference but they clearly do.nothing to do with resources, just bad tactics, these player are doing what they're told by Frank and being negative and sitting back is by design. Why not get on the front foot like against watford and put some pressure on defenders, like teams do to us, or maybe we're the only team with shit cb's and no midfield? Elite tactician?? hmmmmm not too sure.
Deludednothing to do with resources, just bad tactics, these player are doing what they're told by Frank and being negative and sitting back is by design. Why not get on the front foot like against watford and put some pressure on defenders, like teams do to us, or maybe we're the only team with shit cb's and no midfield? Elite tactician?? hmmmmm not too sure.
When it went in BTA was interfering with play as it obstructed the keeper's view / ability to get it
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Nothing. It was a dreadful decision
Leeds rested 10 players
We did but we also had our best forward playing and our best midfielder, which we didn't today or on Wednesday.We got results against these sides last season. You can fucking try! People aren’t pissed off we didn’t win they’re pissed off at the manner of the defeat.
realistic and looking at it without sky blue tinted glasses or defending two shocking performances this week!Deluded
Seriously ? We HAD to rest players today, the players he HAD to bring in are nowhere near good enough,at least give him the tools first, and going by his first signing we’re on the right path, hard to be an elite tactician when you’ve got Eccles, da silva, Lati on the pitch at the same timenothing to do with resources, just bad tactics, these player are doing what they're told by Frank and being negative and sitting back is by design. Why not get on the front foot like against watford and put some pressure on defenders, like teams do to us, or maybe we're the only team with shit cb's and no midfield? Elite tactician?? hmmmmm not too sure.
It's weird that people talk about having a plan as if it's a bad thing.Btw lampard talked about planned subs , can we all just realise it's a common every game thing ?
He chose to not start Grimes despite knowing we have a fixture pile up.Seriously ? We HAD to rest players today, the players he HAD to bring in are nowhere near good enough,at least give him the tools first, and going by his first signing we’re on the right path, hard to be an elite tactician when you’ve got Eccles, da silva, Lati on the pitch at the same time
It literally won’t matter if we beat QPRrealistic and looking at it without sky blue tinted glasses or defending two shocking performances this week!
And then no doubt they’d have been some complaining that he’d changed a winning team.He chose to not start Grimes despite knowing we have a fixture pile up.
We did but we also had our best forward playing and our best midfielder, which we didn't today or on Wednesday.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I mean if Grimes starts Tuesday I think it’s fair enough?He chose to not start Grimes despite knowing we have a fixture pile up.
Why change a team that’s won 5 on the bounce ? no Manager would have put grimes straight in, not sure what your point isHe chose to not start Grimes despite knowing we have a fixture pile up.
Funny how every other lower league side can give their higher league opponents a game today isn’t it?
This match has done nothing more than confirm that an MVE injury would cause real problems , the high line doesn't work and BTA really isn't up to leading the line. Thankfully our best players are to return but the back up isn't great.
Win on Tuesday and get something out of Sheff Wed it’s a fantastic run out to the end of the season compared to where we were before XmasThe serious business starts Tuesday, 6 game run that will define our season
Today and Wednesday just a distraction.
Not really... last year:Funny how every other lower league side can give their higher league opponents a game today isn’t it?
We tried a stupid kick off routine, no idea whyClosest it’s gonna get to KO
View attachment 41378
Ipswich took kick and this is just seconds later. Look how high our back line is already. Mental.
They’ve all lostFunny how every other lower league side can give their higher league opponents a game today isn’t it?
What’s that got to do with today?Not really... last year:
We beat Wolves... higher
We beat Maidstone... much lower
We beat Weds... same.
Didn't find it funny if there was an upset in the same round.
What's today's result got to do with another set of results?What’s that got to do with today?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?