It's just modern journalism. Let's have a heated debate....and people will, so they print more of it.....People get the press they deserve.
Extract from CET article
"With all due respects to the hugely popular Sky Blues boss, the availability of Swansea’s Garry Monk might just keep the wolf from the door on this particular occasion. Fingers crossed anyway.
Do the CET not understand that Garry Monk is no longer at Swansea?
Say something mildly incendiary and they've got one of those 'YOUR REACTIONS' pages lined up for later.
If you google "Tony Mowbray Fulham"
You get links to the Coventry Telegraph stories, websites that link to the Coventry Telegraph stories, and links to Fulham apparently going to appoint Tony Mowbray as Director of Football/ Manager last September.
Oh and links to him getting the Fulham job in 2011.
Absolutely nothing from anywhere apart from the Coventry Telegraph linking him to the Fulham job.
Now either we have Woodward and Bernstein quality reporting on the Telegraph who have got a real scoop, or, more likely, Rodgers and Hammerstein trying to set up a managerial "Carousel" themselves for whatever reason.
Why though? Why not get as many people as possible to get to the game on Saturday?Artificial controversy created by local rag. That's all it is.
Well done you are a good ranterThe ranting comments on the other "rumour" have given birth to this piece.
Coventry telegraph are shitting themselves judging by their articles this week.
Why though? Why not get as many people as possible to get to the game on Saturday?
Coventry telegraph using there own fabricated rumour to attack the club.
Working overtime at the telegraph with a big crowd expected for the Oldham match, got to convince as many as people not to go between now and Saturday.
Indeed, I don't think Simon has been on here since all that stuff about the CT holding back stories for CCC.Yes, Simon has vanished from here but took to peddling stories on Facebook now. I'm embarrassed for them.
I'm sure an article will in tomorrow saying mowbrays odds are lengthening rapidly and Monk is even further down the pecking order.
Well it wasn't what the club owners wanted that is for sure.It still makes me laugh that he and the rag still try to claim credit for getting the club back at the Ricoh.
I'm sure an article will in tomorrow saying mowbrays odds are lengthening rapidly and Monk is even further down the pecking order.
Well if that is true why shouldn't they.
They put out a story and they are against CCFC.
They don't put out a story and they are anti CCFC they have no chance of winning.
If it is in the observer then it must be true well, I for one believe Reed is full of shit therefore I don't read what he writes.
What I don't get is if you all believe it is bullshit then don't read it simple really.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?