What do you mean?
If you mean justificaton of improving the pitch, to make it better for our players, then I can see his arguement if it means we win more games....however, if he wants to have a better pitch, there's one in Coventry we could use.
No doubting that Reg, but while a deal isn't agreed with ACL it's nice to see that the Club are being pro-active in there preparations.
If you've got shit playing on it it does'nt matter about the surface spend the money on your smug face twatty
Take your point Rob - but I'd have thought that this should have been included in the rental. You know, a requirement to keep the pitch in good order.
Which makes me wonder - do SISU ever bother looking at the contracts they sign, or do they just hope to get what they want later in court?
To be honest, I'm actually reading this in part as a veiled threat ("Deal, ACL, or we're staying at NTFC!"), because otherwise it's almost an admission of a lack of foresight, to me.
We'd all like to be at the Ricoh and we all believe it is best for the Club, no arguments there, however a fair deal as to be agreed with ACL and going back on the previous agreements with respect to Matchday Revenues isn't viable or fair on the Club.
If Fisher or Waggot told you the cheque was in the post would you believe them?
If Fisher or Waggot told you they loved you would you believe them?
If Fisher or Waggot told you they wouldn't come in your mouth would you believe them?
Yet some are prepared to swallow just about everything this lying, double-dyed, duplicitous, venal shower of monkey's trot out.
We shouldn't be there, we a Coventry City.
We'd all like to be at the Ricoh and we all believe it is best for the Club, no arguments there, however a fair deal as to be agreed with ACL and going back on the previous agreements with respect to Matchday Revenues isn't viable or fair on the Club.
If Fisher or Waggot told you the cheque was in the post would you believe them?
If Fisher or Waggot told you they loved you would you believe them?
If Fisher or Waggot told you they wouldn't come in your mouth would you believe them?
Yet some are prepared to swallow just about everything this lying, double-dyed, duplicitous, venal shower of monkey's trot out.
We shouldn't be there, we a Coventry City.
Nonsense Rob. There's no reason, especially financial, to be in Northampton. You've swallowed the bullshit hook line and sinker there mate.
So if there is no financial reason to be there why are we?? we cannot continue to lose money whilst at the Ricoh and not make any money from match days apart from ticketing, never mind Northampton? We would need some sort of income just look the other 72 clubs in the FL do.
This all stems from the day we sold HR, by time we built this big shell, we was already on the road to ruin.
It undoubtedly does all stem from the sale of HR, but that isn't why we're preparing to play at Northampton for another season....
As I see it, we're currently in Northampton because our owners are pursuing a high-risk strategy dependent on a court case appeal to support their seeming determination to continue to distress ACL wherever possible.
As long as SISU are determined to follow this strategy we'll need to play at Northampton, regardless of the cost to the club and the fans. Whatever we might have been losing at the Ricoh, under whatever rent deal you choose, we're losing an awful lot more by sticking it out at Northampton.
Coming back and then negotiating for income streams, or even coming back whilst building the new stadium would seem to be better options, personally.
If you're a centre forward give Waggott a ring you have every chanceI'm 30 and still dream about playing for City whether it is at Wembley or the park.
So if there is no financial reason to be there why are we?? we cannot continue to lose money whilst at the Ricoh and not make any money from match days apart from ticketing, never mind Northampton? We would need some sort of income just look the other 72 clubs in the FL do.
This all stems from the day we sold HR, by time we built this big shell, we was already on the road to ruin.
wow!!! we really know how to over react dont we. as i said on the other thread, this is surely just an obligation on our part. it was probably agreed at the start of last season when we first did the deal. im pretty sure it does'nt mean we are staying there for the whole season.
wow!!! we really know how to over react dont we. as i said on the other thread, this is surely just an obligation on our part. it was probably agreed at the start of last season when we first did the deal. im pretty sure it does'nt mean we are staying there for the whole season.
Obligation bollox when have Sisu ever honoured anything never mind a little agreement or contract?
You know they never shook hands on it it was a greeting.
Strange how obligations to NTFC are acted upon straight away isn't it?
They have honoured most contracts really haven't they. It's only ACL and Higgs they haven't for obvious reasons.
not really no, they pressured the bomb squad into leaving as a "mutual decision" but really they made the position untenable for those players who would probably have had a case for constructive dismissal. You could also argue they haven't honored their contract with the football league. They haven't honored the contracts with regard to private seat licences etc.
not really no, they pressured the bomb squad into leaving as a "mutual decision" but really they made the position untenable for those players who would probably have had a case for constructive dismissal. You could also argue they haven't honored their contract with the football league. They haven't honored the contracts with regard to private seat licences etc.
You're saying that the bomb squad players were self employed ?You can't claim constructive dismissal if you are self employed.
You're saying that the bomb squad players were self employed ?
Aren't footballers just employees of the club they are contacted to ?I've always assumed footballers were as they are given a contract term? Aren't they then? Either way unfair dismissal legislation is not favourable to employees of two years and under.
I always believed the revenue treated them as self employed?
Aren't footballers just employees of the club they are contacted to ?
As an example, most of us saw John Arne Riise's payslip online a few years ago, showing employee number and PAYE deductions-very interesting
http://metro.co.uk/2007/10/31/liverpool-star-fumes-as-payslip-turns-up-on-web-419011/
you wouldn't expect NTFC to pay out for it.
you wouldn't expect a landlord to make repairs on a property ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?