Oh look it's Mr Pot
Let's be honest in pure numbers Robs view is a minority one and one with a massive angle as leader of the fans group no one wanted.
He may be right he may be wrong, but he's certainly not representative.
Let's be honest we don't know the majority view if regular supporters.
Many people on here express an opinion on something they do not actually attend. That's akin to having a view on UKIP whilst living in America and never visiting the uk .
It is irrelevant .
Irrelevant?
As you all know I live away from Coventry. But I know for sure you are wrong. This is unless those that I do talk to are different to the majority somehow. There are not that many of you trying to blame CCC/ACL/Higgs all the time without mentioning SISU. Just about all the talk is what SISU are going to do next. Are they going to make an offer? Are they going to stop the litigation? Is Fisher going to stop his bullshit? Usual comments. Not the anti CCC stuff you come out with.
and one with a massive angle as leader of the fans group no one wanted.
What I am saying we have 10,000 supporters - same ones broadly who were there two seasons ago. I asked the people round me if they had been to Sixfields - out of - 10 - 7 had
Most of those will just support the team live game to game and not care whose to blame.
What I am saying we have 10,000 supporters - same ones broadly who were there two seasons ago. I asked the people round me if they had been to Sixfields - out of - 10 - 7 had. That is absolute rubbish! If it were true then the attendance at Sixfields would have been much higher.
What I am saying we have 10,000 supporters - same ones broadly who were there two seasons ago. I asked the people round me if they had been to Sixfields - out of - 10 - 7 had. That is absolute rubbish! If it were true then the attendance at Sixfields would have been much higher.
No it wouldn't - I went to 2 games, one went to three, two others went to one - one had a season ticket.
It's not rocket science is it?
No it wouldn't - I went to 2 games, one went to three, two others went to one - one had a season ticket.
It's not rocket science is it?
That is 5 and not 8 out of 11
What I am saying we have 10,000 supporters - same ones broadly who were there two seasons ago. I asked the people round me if they had been to Sixfields - out of - 10 - 7 had
Most of those will just support the team live game to game and not care whose to blame.
Perhaps they misheard you and they thought you said MK. There is no way that 70% of our fan base went to Northampton even if you include those who went to the hill.
The attendance figures prove that beyond doubt.
No they don't. Technically over 40,000 could have attend - do the maths.
No they don't. Technically over 40,000 could have attend - do the maths.
By balanced argument by the way he means pro council and pro ACL piffle.
I wouldn't stick around if I were you. You'll be reporting on supporters who;
Hate franchise football - unless its Mk Dons
Are ok with franchise rugby - even if the local rugby club don't want it
Can't stand hedge funds unless they finance London Wasps
Want anyone to own the ground other than those who own the football club
Have never considered £1.3 million a year plus matchday costs in rent to be at a detrimental
Rob S is a good bloke and I enjoy having a few pints (and the occasional curry) with him - he's done a lot of good work and he cares. I wouldn't fault his effort and commitment as a City fan.
But.... he does come across as very anti-ACL / pro-SISU (not necessarily his actual views when you talk to him), and he certainly isn't speaking for the majority of fans. It is safe to say he holds SISU, and Joy especially, in far higher regard than most City fans who hate her guts and want her gone.
Rob S is a good bloke and I enjoy having a few pints (and the occasional curry) with him - he's done a lot of good work and he cares. I wouldn't fault his effort and commitment as a City fan.
But.... he does come across as very anti-ACL / pro-SISU (not necessarily his actual views when you talk to him), and he certainly isn't speaking for the majority of fans. It is safe to say he holds SISU, and Joy especially, in far higher regard than most City fans who hate her guts and want her gone.
By balanced argument by the way he means pro council and pro ACL piffle.
I wouldn't stick around if I were you. You'll be reporting on supporters who;
Hate franchise football - unless its Mk Dons
Are ok with franchise rugby - even if the local rugby club don't want it
Can't stand hedge funds unless they finance London Wasps
Want anyone to own the ground other than those who own the football club
Have never considered £1.3 million a year plus matchday costs in rent to be at a detrimental
As I said, other fans would be pissing themselves.
"Bring us back to Coventry and I will go to games, I miss my club and this move is killing me, my kids will never get to see Coventry play in Coventry"
"Actually we are back now. Make ticket prices cheaper and I will come to games"
"Actually now the club has done the decent match package, I will only go if we are in the top 6"
Which fans of other teams would get so worked up about the stadium owners getting rent paid on time? I doubt many give a shite.
The chain goes on.
As I said, other fans would be pissing themselves.
"Bring us back to Coventry and I will go to games, I miss my club and this move is killing me, my kids will never get to see Coventry play in Coventry"
"Actually we are back now. Make ticket prices cheaper and I will come to games"
"Actually now the club has done the decent match package, I will only go if we are in the top 6"
Which fans of other teams would get so worked up about the stadium owners getting rent paid on time? I doubt many give a shite.
The chain goes on.
Nobody has ever given exclusivity of blame to one side. Apart from some of the muffins on here who are usually the first ones to scream bias.So you are content that we are owned by the worst owners in the history of English football, content that we are a mediocre team, in the third division, with crap players, playing the worst football in our history?
You are easily pleased, no wonder sisu don't give a shit about us fans. You and the likes of Grendel are embarrassing. You are right, fans of other clubs must piss themselves reading some of the comments on here.
It's all the council's, ACL's,the HIggs trust's and the fans' fault though isn't it?
True football fans want what is best for our club, and will never be content with mediocrity, why should we just accept what sisu are doing to our club?
Ffs!No they don't. Technically over 40,000 could have attend - do the maths.
Nobody has ever given exclusivity of blame to one side. Apart from some of the muffins on here who are usually the first ones to scream bias.
SISU have been an unmitigated disaster but CCC and ACL respectively don't come out of the story well. That said, in their defence they aren't ultimately responsible for the football club.
The idea that ACL or CCC are beyond reproach if they sell 90% of the business to Wasps is laughable but typical of the double standards on here.
But With all due respect Fernando, CCC, ACL, or anybody else for that matter, do not own Coventry City Football Club, sisu or one of their subsidiaries do, therefore they alone are responsible for this disaster. Like the Brighton fan has stated, we should all be together on this one. Nobody but the owners are to blame, the council do not sign or sell our players, ACL do not sign or sell our players, I know who is responsible, and so should everyone else.Nobody has ever given exclusivity of blame to one side. Apart from some of the muffins on here who are usually the first ones to scream bias.
SISU have been an unmitigated disaster but CCC and ACL respectively don't come out of the story well. That said, in their defence they aren't ultimately responsible for the football club.
The idea that ACL or CCC are beyond reproach if they sell 90% of the business to Wasps is laughable but typical of the double standards on here.
That isn't the point I'm making.When do you think the clubs owners will bother to put an offer in for the 90%?
That isn't the point I'm making.
Why is 90% on the table now?
The offer is commercially confidential I believe so what are SISU trying to match?I know it wasn't the point you were making. Now that it would appear someone may have put an acceptable offer together do you think SISU should try and match the offer or not?
I guess they are available now because someone's put an acceptable offer in, seems pretty straightforward.
The offer is commercially confidential I believe so what are SISU trying to match?
The offer is commercially confidential I believe so what are SISU trying to match?
Does anyone believe that this development wasn't the reason Sisu suddenly brought the club back out of the blue ?
Does anyone believe that this development wasn't the reason Sisu suddenly brought the club back out of the blue ?
I don't. I think their investors are fed up losing their money, and coming back at least means they shouldn't be losing money with this current team.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?