1 goal in 3 home games conceded.
It's up top that is the main worry
Simple question, but why lower down the leagues do managers go for flashy formations? Our best time under Pressley was a bog standard 4-4-2, when players are a bit less quick in thought it's easier, and a quick winger crossing to a big bastard in the middle... at least you create some chances now and again.
(I reserve the right to revise this opinion if we win 5-1 and then go on a 10 game winning streak)
Think it's just tied down.Not sure how that will come out
True but have a look at the away stats aswell
Down the road from the sheaf, not sure of all details as I was inside when this old boy came in with blood streaming down his face.Where's that? Saw a police van blue lighting it to the Wheatsheaf. Bizarrely also saw a load of stewards going round to corporate after 30 mins, surely it hasn't kicked off in there!
Simple question, but why lower down the leagues do managers go for flashy formations? Our best time under Pressley was a bog standard 4-4-2, when players are a bit less quick in thought it's easier, and a quick winger crossing to a big bastard in the middle... at least you create some chances now and again.
(I reserve the right to revise this opinion if we win 5-1 and then go on a 10 game winning streak)
So do we all agree that Tudgay is actually shite and not moan when he does not play please
Come on rain you bastard, abandonment may be best we can hope for....
Reid and Jones could easy play on the wing in a 442 and like you say Ruben or Haynes could fill in. You look at the squad and it favours a 442 far more than a 343 that we're currently playing.Mowbray would probably argue do we have the players for 442. But I'd say Reid can accommodate on the wings. Ruben or even Haynes the other? Clearly got a few CM's to choose from. As today shows we have 3 who can play up top (OK, not very well but they're out and out strikers by trade......allegedly) and defence we have four who can play
Mowbray would probably argue do we have the players for 442. But I'd say Reid can accommodate on the wings. Ruben or even Haynes the other? Clearly got a few CM's to choose from. As today shows we have 3 who can play up top (OK, not very well but they're out and out strikers by trade......allegedly) and defence we have four who can play
Well... Reid is surely the best example of someone who's best suited for 4-4-2?
I admire your optimism, I wish I could share it5th game today and only let in more than one goal once.
If you let in 1 or less a game, you stand a decent chance of getting something out of it.
We are just not getting the breaks at the other end at the moment.
He's probably done more than Sordell in fairness.......
Thanks for that , but that statement is worrying
Got to disagree with this. Most people who play a front 3 don't play out and put wingers, much better in a 4 where they can hug the touchline and supply the front men. A good example is united in their pomp with giggs on the left and kencheslkis on the right.Not really. He's a winger, wingers like playing as high up the pitch as possible i.e in a 3, not in a midfield 4 where they have to track back more.
Got to disagree with this. Most people who play a front 3 don't play out and put wingers, much better in a 4 where they can hug the touchline and supply the front men. A good example is united in their pomp with giggs on the left and kencheslkis on the right.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
unlikeSo do we all agree that Tudgay is actually shite and not moan when he does not play please
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?