Cranie is a fantastic CB, I think he'll be a huge loss. He keeps improving each year and is starting to show the potential which got him in the England U-21's. I suppose it didn't help him playing out of position for 2 years!
If I wanted us to make sure we kept hold of 3 players, they would be Cranie, Keogh and Jutkiewicz.
Or, the flipside of that arguement is that they are trying to build a side within an operating budget that doesn't continue to cripple the club and meet fifas new bullshit law about operational losses....
I totally agree with your sentiment, I wish we'd have given King £20k a week and offered Westwood £20k too so they stayed. But it's a business that they are running and the ship needs to be ran a lot tighter than when the old board (before SISU) were here. So those kinds of wages for 'important' players are never gonna happen.
You forgot Bell on that List!!!
I see Cranie as more of a utility player than an integral part of our squad, with Mcpake leaving as well it will be a loss though. I think Wood however can do as good as job as Cranie imo.Cranie is a fantastic CB, I think he'll be a huge loss. He keeps improving each year and is starting to show the potential which got him in the England U-21's. I suppose it didn't help him playing out of position for 2 years!
If I wanted us to make sure we kept hold of 3 players, they would be Cranie, Keogh and Jutkiewicz.
Even if Cranie was offered a deal last year (say with 18 months to go on his deal) I would wager that he would still be walking away from us at the end of this season for free.
I don't think you can blame SISU for a single players choice, and if you were the player wouldn't you want a bigger slice of the pie?
I'll be gutted to see him go though, but not as gutted as I would be if it were Keogh.
I think we can blame them for a lot of early contract blunders. We should be offering longer term deals a much earlier locking players into contracts to maximise value when situations like this happen. We are in a much worse position based on our contract negotiations than I can ever remember and have built a team for league 1 without even meaning to!. This law is also just a smoke screen.
Quote.......Championship clubs will be allowed only to spend what they earn from the 2012-13 season while sides in League One and Two will not be permitted to spend more than 55% of their turnover on player wages.....
Planning for championship financial constraints 2012/13 season could mean we are in a worse position if we are league one as we will only be able to spend 55% of our turnover! More nonsense from our football club IMO.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/jun/10/football-league-uefa-fair-play
Looks like League 1 will be 55% next year!
... and even if we should stay up, we'll still need to cut wages. Next season will see some dramatic changes across the leagues ... especially this one.
A side effect will be a lot of players released. Maybe Cranie won't be able to get a better contract than he has already been offered.
Sorry guys for my eronious post ,probably confused it with the premiership guidelines,thanks OSB always reliable.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?