CT: City turn down Wolves bid for Clarke; may be interested in player-plus-cash deal (1 Viewer)

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Jan 14, 2014

Hobo said:
Anyone pushing for promotion Lge 1 or fighting relegation Championship would be interested.

Re Wolves avoid Doyle he has done nothing for them this season. Griffith is a good footballer and is the one I would go for.

No chance of Griffiths

jabharty · Jan 14, 2014

If we wanted Griffiths we would have to offer Clarke+cash, rather than the other way around.
Sigurdsson has 2 goals from 17 games this season which isn't brilliant for a striker, but I don't know if Wolves play him as a winger.

Hobo · Jan 14, 2014

CCFC said:
No chance of Griffiths

I know, but the rest aren't worth having.

stupot07 · Jan 14, 2014

The CableGuy said:
The last striker we got from Wolves was Eastwood.

Just saying like.

Although we didn't do too bad with the one before him....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

covcity4life · Jan 14, 2014

stupot07 said:
Although we didn't do too bad with the one before him....

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors

until we sold him and started this horrible downward spiral.

SkyBlueBlood · Jan 14, 2014

torchomatic said:
My mistake. I just thought SISU sold everyone for peanuts.

They still will. The first offer excluded the bag.

SkyBlueBlood · Jan 14, 2014

Why are the Telegraph writing off Cassidy because he is young? I thought he was scoring for fun at Tranmere beginning of last season.

sw88 · Jan 14, 2014

Aside from the young unknown strikers, why are the others not currently in their team? Must be a reason. Griffiths obviously is, and I would imagine it's not a case of him not fitting into Pressleys, but more so that he's out of our reach.

Don't know much about Sigurdsson, but I don't recall seeing him name on any scoresheet for many of those 50 appearances, although I did rate Gudjohnson!

Just been tweeting a Wolves fan about Clarke and he suspects we couldn't afford the wages of any of their players, which I'm inclined to agree with. Even without the embargo I doubt SP will be given too much for wages on new signings.

oscillatewildly · Jan 14, 2014

Gint11 said:
Fair play to the club for holding out. A player + cash would be good.

Not if any of the players mentioned (assuming naturally we will be looking to replace a striker with a striker) are to be taken seriously. There's either inexperience or high wage earners in that list, so cash only and look elsewhere IMO.

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Jan 14, 2014

sw88 said:
Aside from the young unknown strikers, why are the others not currently in their team? Must be a reason. Griffiths obviously is, and I would imagine it's not a case of him not fitting into Pressleys, but more so that he's out of our reach.

Don't know much about Sigurdsson, but I don't recall seeing him name on any scoresheet for many of those 50 appearances, although I did rate Gudjohnson!

Just been tweeting a Wolves fan about Clarke and he suspects we couldn't afford the wages of any of their players, which I'm inclined to agree with. Even without the embargo I doubt SP will be given too much for wages on new signings.

Personally the only viable option for a striker swap I see is Cassidy

CT: City turn down Wolves bid for Clarke; may be interested in player-plus-cash deal (1 Viewer)

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member

jabharty

Member

Hobo

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

covcity4life

Well-Known Member

SkyBlueBlood

Member

SkyBlueBlood

Member

sw88

Chief Commentator!

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

CT: City turn down Wolves bid for Clarke; may be interested in player-plus-cash deal (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Member

Member

Chief Commentator!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency