No, but only playing 20 mins here and there isn't the same as someone playing 90 minutes week in week out.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Yes but the sign of even a half decent striker is that he will usually take 1 out of 2 chances. His record doesn't really set me on fire and a mate on mine who is Villa mad didn't rate him. Would like to be proved wrong though so here's hoping.
Moan if they sign somebody. Moan if they don't. Realistically this is as good as we can get.
But for me that's is the problem, we've not really signed him, we've just borrowed him for a bit. Yes he may turn out to be a good bit of pollyfilla but I would like to see Waggot/Pressley actually sell the club to someone who wants to actually sign for the club rather than using it as a stepping stone. As he is a PL player, if he does well we won't see him again and if he doesn't do well, well the same thing applies. Fact is we are no better off as I doubt he will fire us to the playoffs as we keep shipping goals.
David McGoldrick:
Southamton, apps: 64 - goals: 12
Nottingham Forrest, apps: 63 - goals: 8
Coventry City, apps: 22 - goals: 16
But for me that's is the problem, we've not really signed him, we've just borrowed him for a bit. Yes he may turn out to be a good bit of pollyfilla but I would like to see Waggot/Pressley actually sell the club to someone who wants to actually sign for the club rather than using it as a stepping stone. As he is a PL player, if he does well we won't see him again and if he doesn't do well, well the same thing applies. Fact is we are no better off as I doubt he will fire us to the playoffs as we keep shipping goals.
David McGoldrick:
Southamton, apps: 64 - goals: 12
Nottingham Forrest, apps: 63 - goals: 8
Coventry City, apps: 22 - goals: 16
This is a terrific signing! he has premier league qualities and in the league we are in and the way we play the guy should do at least what Clarke had been doing. He might score for fun in our team. Great stuff from Pressley yet again.
Not sure about the ex Barnet winger though? Where does he fit in?
I see your point, I hope the money from Leon Clarke is reinvested into some players who are "ours" but McGoldrick was only on loan and he gave us entertainment.
i'm with rfc on this one (must check my medication ), i think this is a decent move .I recall when McGlodrick went back to Forest and we signed Clarke many on this site said he (Clarke) was rubbish compared to McGoldrick.
How times change! We were after Delfouneso on loan a few years ago.
Like I said in my post, I would like to be proved wrong. However, does his record fill you with excitement?
But for me that's is the problem, we've not really signed him, we've just borrowed him for a bit. Yes he may turn out to be a good bit of pollyfilla but I would like to see Waggot/Pressley actually sell the club to someone who wants to actually sign for the club rather than using it as a stepping stone. As he is a PL player, if he does well we won't see him again and if he doesn't do well, well the same thing applies. Fact is we are no better off as I doubt he will fire us to the playoffs as we keep shipping goals.
Stole city managed to get promoted to the Premiership principally through loan signings.
... and borrowing him is as good as it gets mate. The club is destitute for various reasons. What else do they do?
Like I said in my post, I would like to be proved wrong. However, does his record fill you with excitement?
Use the money they got for Clarke?
I can't see many League 1 teams bettering this signing in truth.
Wolves have just signed the divisions top scorer.
The one most fans thought was shit whenwe signed him?
Wolves have just signed the divisions top scorer.
The one most fans thought was shit whenwe signed him?
Yes but the sign of even a half decent striker is that he will usually take 1 out of 2 chances. His record doesn't really set me on fire and a mate on mine who is Villa mad didn't rate him. Would like to be proved wrong though so here's hoping.
I do try once a year
No you are right, we should have gone for Rooney instead...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?