Desperate nonsense as always.
You just want to be proven right about playing a back 4 and you are totally blind to a very poor performance.
Starting the game with the formation we played against the leaders Norwich would have won us this game.
I do think we need two up front - when Godden is fit (with Walker).Oggy reckons having 2 up top helped get the goal, BSB chats shit again
I mean I don't mind his posts but to suggest because Robins did something 10 years ago he's going to do it now is bollocks.... We went at Watford, we went at Bristol, we went at forest 2nd half and got fuck all.. We have to find a way to get points and he's doing it, despite the shite performance todayAnd he kept the clowns up who but for a points deduction were relegated last season
Does that settle the Walsh/Hamer argument?
Desperate nonsense as always.
You just want to be proven right about playing a back 4 and you are totally blind to a very poor performance.
Starting the game with the formation we played against the leaders Norwich would have won us this game.
I do think we need two up front - when Godden is fit (with Walker).
I do think we need two up front - when Godden is fit (with Walker).
Except when we draw of course
1 up front but you can’t expect O’Hare & Shipley to keep us in this league their not good enoughI've no problem with 1 up front to keep it tight but at some point you have to go for it. Left it too late tonight. Especially given.how poor several players played.
That doesn't count because Biamou scored late and they had injuries. Tonight does count though Hamer scored even later and Derby were bottom
I believe many of us would have taken a draw , especially given other results. We are in Peril ourselves and it’s nonchalant to believe we could just beat Derby , yes not pretty but a midweek point away in winter is always welcome , move on we went up a place .
Better tell robins - call him a taxi
Better tell robins - call him a taxi
I mean I don't mind his posts but to suggest because Robins did something 10 years ago he's going to do it now is bollocks.... We went at Watford, we went at Bristol, we went at forest 2nd half and got fuck all.. We have to find a way to get points and he's doing it, despite the shite performance today
Set up like that against Rotherham we will be beaten the luck will run out soonwere we on track to concede 100 goals if we carried on with wing backs as we were
answer - yes
Why are we pretending that we haven’t had a massive shift in quality of opposition since the break? Even Norwich were down to the bare bones and poor on the day. We should’ve picked up 10 points the last 4, not 6.
You would rather us play a system where we conceded more goals than anyone else in the leagueWell so is calling me a melt for being right and having others agree, funny they tend to get ignored and it's a pile on on the poster who's openly admitted to being stressed out of his mind
But we have no choice but to use those players. If they're not good enough there's not much we can do.
They've been.thrown.in because we can't afford better.
At the minute we're 19th. Finish there and it's job done but it's not going to be a barrrell of laughs from.now until the end of the season.
You will see it again though I'm afraid, because we're getting points on the board... They can ofcourse try and tweak and work on things in training... Alot of today's problems were poor individual performances imoI'm a huge fan of Robins and unlike some other twat on here I'm not calling for a taxi.
But I certainly don't want to see that formation again.
Bet he has the most single goal victories of any manager who has ever been promoted.
In fairness, they looked as good as us. I thought a draw was just about right. Our full backs had an off night and that's where all our problems came from. Hey ho, a draw away from home against a relagation contender........are people forgetting what we did for 30 years in the Big League!!Derby weren’t good, we just made them look ok by sitting off them all game and gifting them the ball back every time we got it. Our ball retention has been appalling all season. We genuinely look like a League Two side in possession sometimes.
were we on track to concede 100 goals if we carried on with wing backs as we were
answer - yes
4 of Your next 5 games will be same, he shits himself at this level when playing fellow relegation strugglers, he see them as mustn’t lose games rather than very winnable.
But then he went and did it, told you how you’d play against the worst team in the league, and judging by posts in here that’s what happened, it’s not over yet you’ll see it for most of December too.
were we on track to concede 100 goals if we carried on with wing backs as we were
answer - yes
I'm a huge fan of Robins and unlike some other twat on here I'm not calling for a taxi.
But I certainly don't want to see that formation again.
That doesn't count because Biamou scored late and they had injuries. Tonight does count though Hamer scored even later and Derby were bottom
You would rather us play a system where we conceded more goals than anyone else in the league
But then he went and did it, told you how you’d play against the worst team in the league, and judging by posts in here that’s what happened, it’s not over yet you’ll see it for most of December too.
what are next weeks lottery numbers pal ?
1 up front but you can’t expect O’Hare & Shipley to keep us in this league their not good enough
Why are you here?But then he went and did it, told you how you’d play against the worst team in the league, and judging by posts in here that’s what happened, it’s not over yet you’ll see it for most of December too.
Three problems with your usual cluelessness:
1. we conceded goals early this season mostly down to individual errors and adjusting to this league/match fitness after a long lay off
2. our defensive 3 works much better with Kelly shielding and he was out injured in the early games
3. as you know we should have conceded at least 4 tonight even with your "rock solid" defensive 4
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?