D
Deleted member 9744
Guest
What??
What??They have Tom Caroll and Phil Jagielka training with them I’d defo take them both at Cov for next season
They have Tom Caroll and Phil Jagielka training with them I’d defo take them both at Cov for next season
All those on here telling the EFL to punish Derby ought to be careful what they wish for really
Outrageous really
fuckin EFL bottle it and U-turn again, gutless basterds.
I assume they had an embargo for some reason and the reason it’s been relaxed is not cause the reason no longer exists.Why? What rules have they broken say compared to us over the last few years? We’ve cheated the system shamelessly
I assume they had an embargo for some reason and the reason it’s been relaxed is not cause the reason no longer exists.
Which rules have we broken
Not true. The plan needed to be in place within 3 years and it is. And what rule did we break?We had to seek dispensation for playing outside Coventry and the EFL agreed on the basis a new ground would be built in 3 years - the embargo for Derby hasn’t been relaxed
How about we get Scott Dann in too? Could have a back 3 of Fadz, Dann and Jagielka
We need another centre half, it’s just a thought especially as we keep being told money is tight. Ideally we would have Ostigard back, an a fully fit and on form Rose and Hyam with McFadzean as back up but guess it’s all wait and see territoryHow about we get Scott Dann in too? Could have a back 3 of Fadz, Dann and Jagielka
Full to the brim of shit as usualWe had to seek dispensation for playing outside Coventry and the EFL agreed on the basis a new ground would be built in 3 years - the embargo for Derby hasn’t been relaxed
Not true. The plan needed to be in place within 3 years and it is. And what rule did we break?
The embargo has been relaxed to allow them to recruit free transfers hasn’t it?
Yep I know I don’t recall us asking to come out before we had put things right though. I’m sure you’re correct about the flexibilities though and so not outrageous at all if it’s included in the provisions of the embargo. Thanks mateThe EFL rules allow flexibility in certain areas regarding signings and loans so although it’s being described as a relaxation in the press the flexibility is there
When we moved to sixfields we blatantly told the EFL a series of untruths regarding futures intent. Really it’s the same at St. Andrews
When have also used administration legislation as a convenience as well as litigation laws and appeals
We have been under embargo’s ourselves of course going back to Boothroyds day
We had to seek dispensation for playing outside Coventry and the EFL agreed on the basis a new ground would be built in 3 years - the embargo for Derby hasn’t been relaxed
Why?Full to the brim of shit as usual
Opens tomorrowWhy?
Oh yer forgot we have built a new shop.
Factually incorrect, not sure what further info you needWhy?
Oh yer forgot we have built a new shop.
We need another centre half, it’s just a thought especially as we keep being told money is tight. Ideally we would have Ostigard back, an a fully fit and on form Rose and Hyam with McFadzean as back up but guess it’s all wait and see territory
Factually incorrect, not sure what further info you need
As for us we had to show plans for a new ground when the sixfields move was grante
the EFL agreed on the basis a new ground would be built in 3 years
can’t even be arsed, you literally just contradict yourself and backtrack all the time
Ok sorry Wasps built a new shop for us is that better!Factually incorrect, not sure what further info you need
I dont normally agree with Grendel but he has royally kicked your butt on this one.can’t even be arsed, you literally just contradict yourself and backtrack all the time
I think Hummel paid for most of it!Ok sorry Wasps built a new shop for us is that better!
He said the EFL only approved a move on the basis we built a stadium within three years. That’s not true. He then changed to “show plans”, then to “securing land”.I dont normally agree with Grendel but he has royally kicked your butt on this one.
I havent seen anything on here to contradict what he has said, funny that, usually up by the second reply.
See above.Er that’s not a contradiction the EFL granted us dispensation on the basis we were securing land - we made a statement we would not go back to the Ricoh. Given up on the Derby stuff now?
See above.
What are you on about derby stuff?
Fully agree. We need to secure at least one top centre-back and make our back line tough as possible, with a mean back four or five backing up the forwards we will be okay.Reality is, Derby are going to be in trouble this year at the bottom. They’re going to struggle to cobble a team together with the players they have and even if they sign some of short term contracts they will be shite.
Also, I think Blackburn will be in trouble. They’ve released loads of players and signed nobody. Watford last night made a bid for Armstrong.
Huddersfield, Preston and Millwall signings are poor quality and the likes of Forest have done nothing so far.
We should be better than Posh, Hull and Blackpool. Again their signings are L1 standard.
If we get the last few defensive signings right we should hopefully be better than at least 8 clubs here.
Solid mid table is progression for us and if we’re sucked into a relegation fight this year then we haven’t progressed.
Overall I’m very hopeful it will be a good season for us.
It isn’t factually incorrect
Derby and the EFL were arguing over the professional standing rule and the EFL have now conceded ground on this - correctly I think and lessened the embargo restrictions
As for us we had to show plans for a new ground when the sixfields move was granted - hence the game of charades we indulged in
You believed we were actually building that cartoon drawing?
The famous toilet bowl arena! That was definately full of shit.
Don’t get this continuing Derby thread I wonder if their websites have anything like a 64 post thread about us, bet there isn’t one. Two weeks to go to the big kick-off after viewing yesterday’s match I suggest we concentrate on us.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?