McCallum is the obvious oneCan people closer to the action, and who see more games than me, help get my head around exactly what, “buying a player for development” means in reality? Here is my sort of understanding
· A stream for providing new players that started in summer 2017 with Hyam. It adds to the existing streams of purchase, out of contract, loan and youth development. Did it exist before then?
· The concept is that we acquire for a minimal or no fee younger players 20-22 years old whom we see as having unfulfilled potential, usually from other clubs higher up the league.
· The expectation is that they will not be regular first teamers for at least 12 months, although could be on the fringes / on the bench quite quickly
· This is a volume model. Unlike regular acquisitions, we will acquire more than we need, some will make it and some will not. But as players they are quite cheap on the wages bill, so you can afford a bigger squad, that covers against injuries to regulars.
· A good but inexperienced young player from a division above can be better value than acquiring established players at our level – who will cost more
· Can a development player be in the first team from the start, like Mason? Isn’t that just a regular acquisition? Sometimes it is not clear.
· Although it hasn’t happened yet, logically they could be sold on at a profit, after “development”.
Players currently in the squad who are (or have been) “development”
In the first team quite quickly because of injuries and now established: Hyam
As above but place not cemented: Bakayoko, Westbrooke
In the squad / subs bench: Pask, Wakefield
U 23’s: Drysdale, Bartlett
Tried and moved on: Allesani, (and one assumes Baka and Westbrooke eventually)
I know I have missed a couple who have come and gone.
19I must say even thoigh mcallum does sometimes seem the weak link its always nice to remember he is just 20! Could have a very good career for us
I must say even thoigh mcallum does sometimes seem the weak link its always nice to remember he is just 20! Could have a very good career for us
Can people closer to the action, and who see more games than me, help get my head around exactly what, “buying a player for development” means in reality? Here is my sort of understanding
· A stream for providing new players that started in summer 2017 with Hyam. It adds to the existing streams of purchase, out of contract, loan and youth development. Did it exist before then?
· The concept is that we acquire for a minimal or no fee younger players 20-22 years old whom we see as having unfulfilled potential, usually from other clubs higher up the league.
· The expectation is that they will not be regular first teamers for at least 12 months, although could be on the fringes / on the bench quite quickly
· This is a volume model. Unlike regular acquisitions, we will acquire more than we need, some will make it and some will not. But as players they are quite cheap on the wages bill, so you can afford a bigger squad, that covers against injuries to regulars.
· A good but inexperienced young player from a division above can be better value than acquiring established players at our level – who will cost more
· Can a development player be in the first team from the start, like Mason? Isn’t that just a regular acquisition? Sometimes it is not clear.
· Although it hasn’t happened yet, logically they could be sold on at a profit, after “development”.
Players currently in the squad who are (or have been) “development”
In the first team quite quickly because of injuries and now established: Hyam
As above but place not cemented: Bakayoko, Westbrooke
In the squad / subs bench: Pask, Wakefield
U 23’s: Drysdale, Bartlett
Tried and moved on: Allesani, (and one assumes Baka and Westbrooke eventually)
I know I have missed a couple who have come and gone.
more succinct than me. But the points of interest in it as a model areIt's quite simple really,
We identify young players who we think might have a chance at making the grade, then we take a gamble on them and sign them up before they reach an age where bigger clubs want them.
Then hopefully, in a few years time they play in our first team, look good, and get sold for shitloads of money, which is then used to keep the club in business.
Simples.
more succinct than me. But the points of interest in it as a model are
- This new, it started with Hyam. is this correct?
- As yet we haven't sold anybody on and so far none of them have the look of big cash, even if they are good at this level
- Sometimes the expression "development" is used an expression to down play fan's expectations. Actually it's a straight forward new player. I suspect mason and Wakefield are in that camp.
Ok I have deleted Baka from the list and added Walters, whom I had forgotten. I thought Bremang, Williams and McCallum came through youth but am obviously misguided. Where did they come from? Bremang is too young surely.
As regards having too large a squad, there are two things to discount that argument. Firstly injuries show just how quickly a player can get his chance as a sub - after that it is down to the player to impress. Wakefield has had several chances as sub but has not grabbed any of them in the way Hyam did. Secondly, as I know from a friend who is chairman of a 7th tier club that feeds in a Div 2 team, there are hundreds of desperate young players (with pushy parents quite frequently) who will give their eye teeth for the chance to play at our level. Supply well exceeds demand so we should exploit that to the full.
I also wonder whether this might have originated in part at least with our owners, who have this excellent training facility and want to extract as much value as possible. It is not the same as Chelsea, as our preference is that the players do turn out for City - Chelsea know that 99% of there youth squad will not
Deisel?Not a new concept. Ian Wallace and Gary Gillespie were two who broke through into the first team very quickly, which they weren't expected to do. Of course it was known as the Rederve Team then. The days of the no 12, one sub.
Age is no barrier to good players.I must say even thoigh mcallum does sometimes seem the weak link its always nice to remember he is just 20! Could have a very good career for us
It's quite simple really,
We identify young players who we think might have a chance at making the grade, then we take a gamble on them and sign them up before they reach an age where bigger clubs want them.
Then hopefully, in a few years time they play in our first team, look good, and get sold for shitloads of money, which is then used to keep the club in business.
Simples.
rose was a free out of contractThe team on Saturday came from 6 different strands. This is good.
- To single out occasional instances in the past like Gillespie, Wallace and even Jones misses the point. We have always had instances like that from time to time. But now there is a concerted programme
- This programme is based on the assumption that a %, maybe quite a high one, will not make it. After all in Saturday's team only two were development - McCallum and Westbrooke, and both these can expect to lose their places. It is early days but thus far only Hyam is established.
- People are right to spot the Chelsea influence. It is not the same, but is clearly derived from it.
- The net is clearly cast very wide - Herne Bay!! Who the hell are Conquest Academy?? Which means resources are devoted to it.
Youth - Shipley
Loan - Walsh
Out of contract - Marosi & McFadzean
Purchase - Godden, Rose,
Not sure whether we paid anything or not - Jobello, Hiwula & Dabo (and small beer if we did)
Development - McCallum & Westbrooke
From 2018-19 = 4 - Shipley, Westbrooke, McCallum and Hiwula.
even betterMajor successes
McCallum
Mason
rose was a free out of contract
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?