Do you want to discuss boring politics? (31 Viewers)

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Because having a cheeky wank over fake taxi is obviously the same as sexually assaulting children.

That mate I've got that had a scrap outside ikon in 2003, just as bad as saville.
Nope wrong again
Don’t you worry I’m sure you’ll never have to deal with anyone in your friendship group.

Did you read it -

Don’t worry about me I’m just trying to do my best to reduce danger to women and children

We all have those things we are passionate about and it’s a good thing we don’t all the share the same ones.
 

Nick

Administrator
Nope wrong again
Don’t you worry I’m sure you’ll never have to deal with anyone in your friendship group.

Did you read it -

Don’t worry about me I’m just trying to do my best to reduce danger to women and children

We all have those things we are passionate about and it’s a good thing we don’t all the share the same ones.

Yeah it's really reducing the risk by sympathising, defending and comparing it to somebody having a wank. Let's face it, what you are posting is no better than people defending grooming gangs.

That self awareness I said a couple of pages back..
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Yeah it's really reducing the risk by sympathising, defending and comparing it to somebody having a wank. Let's face it, what you are posting is no better than people defending grooming gangs.

That self awareness I said a couple of pages back..
Just nonsense but I understand why you would say that
There’s no defending grooming gangs there’s no defending any sexual offences or criminal activity
There’s no sympathising with either pr equivalence other than what you’re implying
For some people with addictions they escalate it’s not hard to understand unless you don’t want to
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top