Why does everything have to be so deep and people taking pleasure in looking at things in a way that they can be offended?
The subject of knife crime is thought provoking enough without looking for hidden meanings. Life is a lot simpler if like me, your thought process at the end was 'that was good, i enjoyed it'. What shall we watch next? I have a wife and a daughter so I'm well aware of life's imbalance that in many ways should be addressed, but ffs if you watch something for entertainment purposes then allow it to entertain you!
It’s not much different to the Mr Bates vs the Post Office stuff reallyGetting a bit bored of hearing about Adolescence hype now.
Yes, the misogyny is an issue as is social media but every day it's the media trying to ram it down throats.
It’s not much different to the Mr Bates vs the Post Office stuff really
It’s not much different to the Mr Bates vs the Post Office stuff really
Looks like they've thought this one through.
Terrorism suspect linked to 7/7 bombings set to be released from prison
Haroon Aswat, jailed for 20 years for plotting to form extremist training camp, may be freed despite remaining ‘risk to national security’www.telegraph.co.uk
It is really as one was based on fact whereas the other was entirely fictionalIt’s not much different to the Mr Bates vs the Post Office stuff really
They are obviously different (as I said) but they’re both ultimately dramatisations inspired by real-life events.It is really as one was based on fact whereas the other was entirely fictional
They are obviously different (as I said) but they’re both ultimately dramatisations inspired by real-life events.
There’s no reason why well researched and/or thoughtful fiction can’t inspire policy and there’s a long history of it doing so.
I though the Netflix programme was really not that great tbh
I mean, it’s pretty obviously going to win a ton of awards. From an acting and a technical perspective it was mental. Episodes 1 and 3 were particularly good imo.The way people are banging on it's Oscar worthy.
People have gone all in cocks in hand.
I mean, it’s pretty obviously going to win a ton of awards. From an acting and a technical perspective it was mental. Episodes 1 and 3 were particularly good imo.
I mean, it’s pretty obviously going to win a ton of awards. From an acting and a technical perspective it was mental. Episodes 1 and 3 were particularly good imo.
Decision on her appeal deferred till next summer, menwhile Le Pen is free to campaign.Marine la penn has been found guilty today and barred from running for the presidency for five year's and likely have to wear a tag like Sarkozye, apparently for using fund's for something different from what they were intended.
Yes the acting from the two young actors - who it seems have never done any on screen acting before - was excellent but the plot line and character depth was very thin
This is the hype im on about.…deliberately. I thought it was very good, but I wouldn’t really describe it as tv, it was more like art.
This is the hype im on about.
Some of the parts of the story were inexplicable, why were they scousers who'd decided to go any live in Doncaster?The technical aspect was its downfall really as you couldn’t get plot dimensions. Stephen Graham seems to specialise in these and it worked in the chef drama as that’s literally a day in a kitchen - this was over 18 months and we saw 4 hours
Yes the acting from the two young actors - who it seems have never done any on screen acting before - was excellent but the plot line and character depth was very thin
Some of the parts of the story were inexplicable, why were they scousers who'd decided to go any live in Doncaster?
The incel element to it was that the perp had been told he was an incel, not that he really believed in it? It didn't refer to any evidence of him being radicalised, more that being an incel was imposed on him. It
I won't be watching. Sounds like misery.The way people are banging on it's Oscar worthy.
People have gone all in cocks in hand.
Misery was another classic tooI won't be watching. Sounds like misery.
You lack culture. Not my issue.
What I’m getting at is, to be honest, I wasn’t entertained in the purest sense of the word. The focus of the programme was more to highlight the impact it had on everyone around the situation, rather than focus on the situation itself. The writer literally confirmed it.
I've always been deeply suspicious of anything attached to a massive propaganda campaign, I ask myself who is paying for it and who ultimately benefits. The focus seems to be on restricting social media for minors, that is what the main writer Jack Thorne has said and Australia has already legislated in that area. The new age of censorship is upon us.Like I said, it's the hype train.
It's a Netflix TV show FFS. The way people are being so deep is hilarious. That again comes back to all of the media, the hype, MPs banging on about it.
For somebody who will have just put it on. Watched it. Moved into the next thing on Netflix and didn't pay any attention to the huge media campaign behind it then it's just that.
The pr campaign that has gone along with it you build up hype is massive.
Getting children off social media and generally reducing their screen time while increasing their time spent interacting with real people in the real world would be a tremendous thing.I've always been deeply suspicious of anything attached to a massive propaganda campaign, I ask myself who is paying for it and who ultimately benefits. The focus seems to be on restricting social media for minors, that is what the main writer Jack Thorne has said and Australia has already legislated in that area. The new age of censorship is upon us.
Australian social media ban on under-16s approved by parliament
The ban aims to reduce "harms" on children and will take at least a year to implement, the PM says.www.bbc.co.uk
Like I said, it's the hype train.
It's a Netflix TV show FFS. The way people are being so deep is hilarious. That again comes back to all of the media, the hype, MPs banging on about it.
For somebody who will have just put it on. Watched it. Moved into the next thing on Netflix and didn't pay any attention to the huge media campaign behind it then it's just that.
The pr campaign that has gone along with it to build up hype is massive.
A propaganda campaign to stop kids consuming online content, sponsored by Netflix?I've always been deeply suspicious of anything attached to a massive propaganda campaign, I ask myself who is paying for it and who ultimately benefits. The focus seems to be on restricting social media for minors, that is what the main writer Jack Thorne has said and Australia has already legislated in that area. The new age of censorship is upon us.
Australian social media ban on under-16s approved by parliament
The ban aims to reduce "harms" on children and will take at least a year to implement, the PM says.www.bbc.co.uk
Streaming on Amazon Prime this August‘A propaganda campaign to stop kids consuming online content, sponsored by Netflix?’
Nope, wrong end of the stick as usual, it is to introduce additional censorship of certain unapproved content.A propaganda campaign to stop kids consuming online content, sponsored by Netflix?
Is that a big priority for Netflix? For Jack Thorne and Stephen Graham? Just trying to understand where this “massive propaganda campaign” is coming from.Nope, wrong end of the stick as usual, it is to introduce additional censorship of certain unapproved content.
Not sure it was that either but let's face it the hype has worked and it's got shit loads watching it. Job done.Is that a big priority for Netflix? For Jack Thorne and Stephen Graham? Just trying to understand where this “massive propaganda campaign” is coming from.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?