And comparing this negatively from the twat in charge who said there were no parties, then he didn’t attend one then sacking people who had been to them and then received a penalty notice for attending one. Certainly parody isn’t itI didn’t say he did.
Still I guess poor Sir Smarmer (shamefully borrowed) rubbing shoulders with posh alumni shaped him to the man he is
One who laughs at strikers who live in some place called Coventry
So you didn't say this?
Wait. You're not going to say that by saying his father paid the fees you actually haven't said that Starmer paid fees... Are you? Desperate stuff if so.
Was the 2017 Conservative manifesto popular?
Not disagreeing with that, but would you say it's 'earning' votes?A party that managed to convince the populous that Jacob Rees-Mogg is a ‘man of the people’ has no intention of doing anything other than conning people - but somehow it works.
Was it anyone bar CorbynNot disagreeing with that, but would you say it's 'earning' votes?
Would you prefer Labour to make promises they have no intention of keeping and resorting to vacuous three word slogans just to get into power?
It should be, but reality sadly suggests it's not. Look at the last election - Tory manifesto was practically empty apart from 'Get Brexit Done' (with no detail as to how to do it) and they got a landslide.Not sure why that’s important. Surely policy is key.
The thing with selective education is the fact that it has historically been divided into those that do well academically and therefore will be successful, and those who do not and won't be.Im not. He benefitted from selective private education. Doubt he’s be there if he was in a secondary modern / comp dump would you?
John McDonnell never paid for his £36,000 a year boarding school either
Not disagreeing with that, but would you say it's 'earning' votes?
Would you prefer Labour to make promises they have no intention of keeping and resorting to vacuous three word slogans just to get into power?
Not disagreeing with that, but would you say it's 'earning' votes?
Would you prefer Labour to make promises they have no intention of keeping and resorting to vacuous three word slogans just to get into power?
If it’s not earning votes then maybe the notion of showing people that what you have to offer is worth you voting for them.Not disagreeing with that, but would you say it's 'earning' votes?
Would you prefer Labour to make promises they have no intention of keeping and resorting to vacuous three word slogans just to get into power?
3 word slogansIf it’s not earning votes then maybe the notion of showing people that what you have to offer is worth you voting for them.
I don’t think it’s the issue of Labour offering false promises or 3 word slogans… it’s that they are offering absolutely nothing. We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis and they appear to have not to say or offer on the matter.
Maybe they aren't offering as much about dealing with the crisis. But even the things they do suggest won't happen because they aren't in power, and often certain policies will only work when linked to others so unless they hve control of budgets etc decent suggestions would fail and thus be smeared for the future.If it’s not earning votes then maybe the notion of showing people that what you have to offer is worth you voting for them.
I don’t think it’s the issue of Labour offering false promises or 3 word slogans… it’s that they are offering absolutely nothing. We are in the midst of a cost of living crisis and they appear to have not to say or offer on the matter.
If this was private enterprise the CEO would be in court on all sorts of charges. Those that were responsible should be treated the same. It was criminal negligence.
Matt has moved on with his lover now can’t we leave him in peace. What a lying wanker he isIf this was private enterprise the CEO would be in court on all sorts of charges. Those that were responsible should be treated the same. It was criminal negligence.
It’s not my vote that needs to be won, despite my overwhelming reservation about Starmer, Reeves and the direction he is going - when push comes to shove that’s where it will probably go.Maybe they aren't offering as much about dealing with the crisis. But even the things they do suggest won't happen because they aren't in power, and often certain policies will only work when linked to others so unless they hve control of budgets etc decent suggestions would fail and thus be smeared for the future.
On the other hand, what are the alternative to that (the Tories) offering? They're creating this mess and their policies are making it worse. So if that's what I'm going to get instead, I'd still rather let Labour have a go even if I'm not entirely happy with that.
It's quite simple. If you let these things stop you voting for a flawed Labour you'll end up with the even more flawed Tories. And that's far, far worse.
Many many many reasons not to stay with a Tory vote surelyIt’s not my vote that needs to be won, despite my overwhelming reservation about Starmer, Reeves and the direction he is going - when push comes to shove that’s where it will probably go.
But if you’re someone who doesn’t engage in voting, or voted Tory in 2019 because you believed respecting the referendum was the right thing to do, what is it that the Labour Party have to offer that will make you engage or switch vote?
Of course - but what happens when they just don’t bother at all.Many many many reasons not to stay with a Tory vote surely
Hopefully Dim will lose his seat at the next election. He’s been turning it into a Lib Dem seat as long as he’s sat in it. Only just got elected in 2019. Struggle to see how he’ll survive the next GE.
But there will be plenty like you who aren't totally happy with the current leadership and will say exactly the same. "It's not about me, it's about convincing those that aren't traditional Labour supporters" Those individuals soon add up.It’s not my vote that needs to be won, despite my overwhelming reservation about Starmer, Reeves and the direction he is going - when push comes to shove that’s where it will probably go.
But if you’re someone who doesn’t engage in voting, or voted Tory in 2019 because you believed respecting the referendum was the right thing to do, what is it that the Labour Party have to offer that will make you engage or switch vote?
So you didn't say this?
Wait. You're not going to say that by saying his father paid the fees you actually haven't said that Starmer paid fees... Are you? Desperate stuff if so.
3 word slogans
Let’s move on
Anyone but corbyn
Brexit brexit brexit
Seems he was exempt from paying fees, likely because he was already a pupil when it converted from a !!+ Grammar to a fee paying school
Lord Ashcroft’s unauthorised biography of Keir Starmer is as dry as the Labour leader
With Red Knight, Michael Ashcroft tries to find dirt on Starmer, but all he unearths is a decent, hardworking man and a bit of a borewww.telegraph.co.uk
View attachment 24495
Yep Grendel just made a total tit of himself over it. Got it wrong, doubled down on it, then denied he said it, then said something about John McDonnell to deflect.
Labour are just taking the piss out of him nowUsual line about 'under Labour we'd still be in lockdown' and then something about a communist energy plan in Nottingham.
Pathetic stuff as per.
Massive Cock fucks entire country.These twats can't go a single day without something embarrassing coming out
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?