Samo
Well-Known Member
Is the implication here that SISU/King have not provided the required information to the EFL?
The last snippet of info we've had was from the EFL basically saying the ball was in King and SISUs court. I suspect the ball is still there and long since stopped bouncing.
That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.Certainly reads that way:
"Whilst we acknowledge your desire for information, it is EFL policy not to provide specific details regarding any applications under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test. A number of requirements must be met in the event of any potential application for a change of control. All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements, and matters remain ongoing.
We can only suggest you may wish to contact the Club for an update should you wish."
Is the implication here that SISU/King have not provided the required information to the EFL?
You can’t help thinking this isn’t going to happen.That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.
That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.
That reads incredibly blandly to me. We have a process, everybody knows the process, ask the club because we ain't telling you anything.
Certainly reads that way:
"Whilst we acknowledge your desire for information, it is EFL policy not to provide specific details regarding any applications under the Owners’ and Directors’ Test. A number of requirements must be met in the event of any potential application for a change of control. All we can advise is that the Club and any prospective purchasers are aware of the League’s requirements, and matters remain ongoing.
We can only suggest you may wish to contact the Club for an update should you wish."
They do say though a number of requirements what are they.I think people are reading way too much into that EFL response.
Indeed, the unthinkable seems set to happen, and I suppose that's a good thing as long as we avoid the total mentalist option!Yup, and one thing is becoming obvious, SISU seem intent on offloading the club, so one way or another it will have to happen.
Unfortunately the first signing is the Qatari goalkeeper.I think King must be in Qatar signing up our new players for January.
That is true. But by a strange coincidence they still might be right. The ball may very much be in King’s and SISU’s hands. Personally I’ll believe it when it’s completed. If it never happens I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.I think people are reading way too much into that EFL response.
That is true. But by a strange coincidence they still might be right. The ball may very much be in King’s and SISU’s hands. Personally I’ll believe it when it’s completed. If it never happens I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised.
So an improvement I love it
Sounds on par with a certain purse hoarding finnish woman"Failure, liar, debt dodger, swindler"
Sounds perfect! When can he start?
I'm pretty sure Dodger and Swindler were our central midfield pairing in the 1950/51 season."Failure, liar, debt dodger, swindler"
Sounds perfect! When can he start?
I can so see this being an A level mechanics question.Fascinating suggestion. One which I've just pondered. However I'm still thinking counter-balance.
View attachment 27563
So Mr Red's legs are the pivot point. Mr Blue can move forward or back, enabling Mr Red to directly hit the water rather than soiling the historic brick work.
Was there a stipulation to shit directly in to the canal? If not, then it would be far easier to lay a log in the comfort of your own home (or someone else's, for a laugh), transport it incognito, and roll it in off the towpath.I can so see this being an A level mechanics question.
Though of course the correct answer the easiest way to shit directly into the canal is:
c) get on a barge and sit over the edge.
Agreed. Why would they go into detail to respond to a random fan request.I think people are reading way too much into that EFL response.
Agreed. Why would they go into detail to respond to a random fan request.
Good acoustics are desired if not compulsory - v difficult to achieve the right tone and volume ('plop') if shit not produced in situWas there a stipulation to shit directly in to the canal? If not, then it would be far easier to lay a log in the comfort of your own home (or someone else's, for a laugh), transport it incognito, and roll it in off the towpath.
Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk
Fraught with danger, I'm afraid. The chances of the branch breaking would lead to involuntary sphincter tightening and the bomb doors jammed shut.I reckon the easiest way would be to hold on to a tree bankside and squat out... if you were still worried about splashback could use rope for extra distance...
Let it all out.I think I might be having a breakdown
Good point. From that height there would be quite a plop.Good acoustics are desired if not compulsory - v difficult to achieve the right tone and volume ('plop') if shit not produced in situ
A true connoisseur!Prefer the word "spladoosh" to plop, think it has more gravitas
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?