MalcSB
Well-Known Member
It makes me laugh a bit when I see how successful Frasers seem to have made the arena. A far cry from Wasps record and would have been a major help to the club if King had managed to acquire it.
It makes me laugh a bit when I see how successful Frasers seem to have made the arena. A far cry from Wasps record and would have been a major help to the club if King had managed to acquire it.I would be interested to hear why you think he has "dodged a bullet"
The first action Frasers did once they owned CBS was to cancel the SISU licence. Being only a licence Frasers can (theoretically) cancel the current agreement any time.
DKs 5 year promotion target is to fit in with the licence term. It will be interesting to see what Frasers do
It was sarcasm.
It is ludicrous that people are still trying their hardest to cry about Robins going.
People were even annoyed that King got rid of Boddy because he and Robins were close. The same Boddy people had slagged off for ruining clubs for years.
There were people singing King's name, literally not so long ago.
If you want ludicrous, have a look at who was saying Rhys Carr was "gormless" because he wasn't Mark Robins.
To be fair I’m yet to see it turn any sort of profit. First year accounts show a £4 million pound loss. We’ll see if it turns around in January with the new accounts but don’t think the arena has ever done well.It makes me laugh a bit when I see how successful Frasers seem to have made the arena. A far cry from Wasps record and would have been a major help to the club if King had managed to acquire it.
I guess these documents don’t exist after all thenI've just asked if I can post it
I hope it's agreed
Be funny
People will probably still be talking about Robins here in 60 years time , you probably should get used to it mate
Stags in West Ham kits? Don't think so.Probably the same people crying their eyes out over Gavin and Stacey.
I guess these documents don’t exist after all then
Perhaps if you told us what these documents consist of - other enquiries could be made?They do, but doesn't want them on a public forum of random people. Which is understandable. You don't have to believe it you know, that's one of the good things in life
Given that someone has directly disputed your version of events, which seem to rely on documents that you’ve claimed to have available but have failed to deliver, I think people can make up their own minds, yes.They do, but doesn't want them on a public forum of random people. Which is understandable. You don't have to believe it you know, that's one of the good things in life
Does this work both ways? Does the person who disputed Saddles version of events have to provide proof of who did pay the bill?Given that someone has directly disputed your version of events, which seem to rely on documents that you’ve claimed to have available but have failed to deliver, I think people can make up their own minds, yes.
No. But if they claimed not only to have documents that backed up their claims, but that they also might be able to produce said documents, then it looks a bit silly if they then fail to come up with the goods.Does this work both ways? Does the person who disputed Saddles version of events have to provide proof of who did pay the bill?
No. But if they claimed not only to have documents that backed up their claims, but that they also might be able to produce said documents, then it looks a bit silly if they then fail to come up with the goods.
I haven't said who did pay the bill - I have simply said RO did not.Does this work both ways? Does the person who disputed Saddles version of events have to provide proof of who did pay the bill?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?