Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Yes but they were fan owned during that time we will still be stuck with a hedge fund that defies logic in refusing to entertain a sale
They also had two years miles and miles away and a decade in a ground unfit for purpose - they want be any court cases still going in 12 years
Yes but they were fan owned during that time we will still be stuck with a hedge fund that defies logic in refusing to entertain a sale
I’m sure they will sell if the price is what they want
First bid was never going to be accepted but not turning it down flat just maybe opens the door for talks, another bid etc. Fingers crossedYeah G and when we know that over £7 million isn’t enough to even get round the table what will be enough and who in their right mind would pay? There was nobody else to support in Sussex. We are surrounded by Championship and top flight clubs
Stand up? Tap dancing? Singing?Could entertain Birmingham possibly
Made me laugh out loudStand up? Tap dancing? Singing?
Sorry, I’m in an odd mood today!
First bid was never going to be accepted but not turning it down flat just maybe opens the door for talks, another bid etc. Fingers crossed
It was their 5th bid.First bid was never going to be accepted but not turning it down flat just maybe opens the door for talks, another bid etc. Fingers crossed
DickheadLinnell dropped out on CWR that he’s spoken to the Northampton chairman and they’d be happy to groundshare again.
Yes but the fourth bid was how long ago, 2/3 years ?It was their 5th bid.
Linnell is certainly an “I told you so merchant”Dickhead
Why on earth would anyone vote for A ahead of B?. I don't even understand the third option.I answered B, move away for three years at Championship/League 1 level so long as there's a clear way back for CCFC to return within a set timescale, preferably to a stadium not owned by Wasps. (That's how I've perceived the question/answer!)
Rather that than vote A, move away with no set timescale or strategy to return, or C, get expelled from the EFL, play non-league football at Nuneaton (if Norman will have us!) Shitty ground, shitty football, no set timescale or strategy to return.
Not well worded is it.Can anyone please tell me what option 3 on this actually means:
"opposition to a ground share outside Coventry as an alternative to expulsion from the EFL"
if I say "yes" to this what does this mean?
Sounds like if I don't want expulsion from the EFL (which I don't) then I must/ should/ probably possibly / definitely oppose a ground share as well .Not well worded is it.
Yeah. Opposition to a ground share as an alternative to expulsion.Sounds like if I don't want expulsion from the EFL (which I don't) then I must/ should/ probably possibly / definitely oppose a ground share as well .
It's total tosh.
"Do you want to be expelled from the football league?"Yeah. Opposition to a ground share as an alternative to expulsion.
Sounds like opposing a ground share is an alternative to being expelled.
It means you are opposed to a groundshare as an alternative to expulsion, thus you would rather be expelled from the league than have a groundshare.Can anyone please tell me what option 3 on this actually means:
"opposition to a ground share outside Coventry as an alternative to expulsion from the EFL"
if I say "yes" to this what does this mean?
As I say, not worded at all well.It means you are opposed to a groundshare as an alternative to expulsion, thus you would rather be expelled from the league than have a groundshare.
If there was a good chance of football in Coventry then I think quite a few would agree. If we play at Stadium MK or even beyond 15 miles it will be an absolute disaster.As I say, not worded at all well.
Would you accept expulsion from the league rather than commit to a ground share.
Only because they got a good deal, below market value for a 250 year lease. Somebody ought to look at that!
Or have I missed something?
I read it as saying it's a vote for a more local ground share. It's the best option if a Ricoh deal can't be done.View attachment 11844 62% of telegraph readers would rather we're expelled than ground share.
Where is this other stadium in Coventry we're going to ground share at?I read it as saying it's a vote for a more local ground share. It's the best option if a Ricoh deal can't be done.
It doesn't say Coventry, it's the Coventry area. It hasn't been defined in the question, but I'd class Rugby as the Coventry area for example.Where is this other stadium in Coventry we're going to ground share at?
I really don't see how you're interpreting it as that.No, it reads as expulsion from the league
The "alternative to expulsion" bit gives it away.I really don't see how you're interpreting it as that.
I am opposed to a groundshare outside of coventry as an alternative to being expelled.I really don't see how you're interpreting it as that.
But you don't get to that bit if you can agree a ground share in the Coventry area.The "alternative to expulsion" bit gives it away.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?