Having no permanent ground could become an issue, that’s why it needs sorting asap.I was just about to write. Obviously it won’t happen. I’ve been trying to work out if we’d be let in. No stadium and all that. Maybe a Championship and Championship 1.
For those slagging off the EFL and Rick Parry.
Bear in mind he is not an all powerful President, but the chairman of a committee of 70 odd all of whom have member's rights. The EFL clearly have a favoured solution - PPG. By restricting choice and delaying the decision it makes it more, not less likely that PPG will result. The later the decision, the less likely clubs will have the time to complete the season. EFL appear to have have engineered it so the choice is between their preferred one - PPG, and one which increasingly over time can not be delivered - complete the season. Ironically for those calling the EFL "amateurs" you should probably cheer every delay on.
By making it a change to the constitution applicable to future seasons, it avoids legal action about a one-off decision that breaks the rules. The idea of having bigger group in the play offs is really only applicable to this season because it is unusually close, but that cannot be factored into a constitutional change. Last year the top 6 was virtually decided by the end of February.
As League 1 is an uneven number, a tied vote is unlikely for which we can thank that scoundrel who took over Bury. Although it is not impossible (Southend abstaining?). But if there was a tie, I don't think null and void is the default, as I previously thought, I suspect it is to complete the season.
Weighted PPG is no better than PPG, it is still unfair - it depends on who your outstanding fixtures are just as much as unweighted does. For legal reasons, simplicity is good, it leaves less to be contested by lawyers.
Finally, as I have tweeted elsewhere, the size of our lead is utterly irrelevant and people should stop banging on about it. The top two are a single unit who are treated identically within the rules by being automatically promoted. It matters not who is 1st or 2nd. There is no "Promote Cov, Rotherham in the play offs" option - the issue at stake is the gap between the lower of the top 2 the club placed 3rd, not that between 1st and 3rd. Had Rotherham been say 5 ahead of 3rd, say, the case for PPG would be even stronger.
If someone has said all this above , sorry. Just had to get it out of my head.
Makes no valuation of the quality of the opponents still to play - some have to play fewer top clubs than othersThere is nothing unfair about ppg, it is based on fact and applied consistently.
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
I wouldn’t be surprised if the vote is to carry on, after all the time that has gone by I’d be nervous now.Oxford confirmed they are voting to play on
Oxford United set to spring major EFL vote surprise
nobody knows for sure but I have a nasty feeling this may be a lot closer than anyone thinks. What are we at now- 6 definitely voting to play on, 6 definitely voting to end? I don’t see why so many people are saying it’s a done deal (obviously I hope it is)
2018-2019 League One TableCould somebody make a ppg table from this point last season? It would be interesting to see how much difference there could be!
That is not fact it is conjectureMakes no valuation of the quality of the opponents still to play - some have to play fewer top clubs than others
That is not fact it is conjecture
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
Yeah, saw that.Anyone see MacAnthony's latest Twitter rants?
Essentially saying other clubs (and renowned Football Finance guy Kieran Maguire) are exaggerating & true cost to resume is circa £250k
I suspect the number one factor for most L1 L1 clubs is the furlough scheme
If they vote to resume playing the squad will have to return to training and all players and coaching staff come of furlough
If 30 players and staff come back this will result in the loss of £75,000 per month is government support
The scheme runs to the end of August so will take us through to July when normal pre season usually starts
This PPE figure seems to be shrinking by the day with him.Anyone see MacAnthony's latest Twitter rants?
Essentially saying other clubs (and renowned Football Finance guy Kieran Maguire) are exaggerating & true cost to resume is circa £250k
EFL will pay for tests against future monies due to clubs so ultimately clubs paying.can you clear up who will pay for testing if play resumes Better days?
Thrill of it All is a killer riftBrilliant!
Currently listening to Sabotage.
I don’t like Emerson. He disallowed a goal of mine at dads v kids at his sons primary school.... :emoji_laughing:Emerson was never the same when he came back.
A couple of times we were linked with Megson as manager, I wouldn't have been too happy with that.
I don’t like Emerson. He disallowed a goal of mine at dads v kids at his sons primary school.... :emoji_laughing:
Vote now expected on the 8th June...... that seems massively late......
No. He even ignored a supporter Standing right by the goal who told him it went in. Admittedly, it was my wife....he didn't go to VAR?!
Imagine if this was the point the Championship broke away from the EFL and they ended promotion and relegation. Sunderland and Pompey would be stuck in L1!
Obviously won't happen but would be funny. Even if the Championship did decide to move to that system they're find a way to get the 'big' clubs in.
That is not fact it is conjecture
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
This PPE figure seems to be shrinking by the day with him.
He's deliberately missing the point. Clubs with financial issues or nothing to play for don't want to be extending players contracts past June 30th. Would seem some teams bitching about this type of teams putting out very weak sides in July to save money. So distorting the integrity of the competition.
Vote now expected on the 8th June...... that seems massively late......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?