Its about time Harry Kane was given a shot. I just hope he's not another Michael Ricketts, on top of his game for his club, fucking dismal for his country. I dont think it will come to that and i reckon Kane will be a challenge to Rooney and Sturridge
Wouldn't he be better off in the U21s? I think they should keep that group together for the Euros.
Players i dont get:
1) Jones - never rated him but he plays for Man Utd so he gets called up
2) Townsend - Again not sure why he warrents a call up
3) Walker - really?..
As for Kane, he was definately entitled to the call up as long as he plays. If he doesnt then he should have been in the U21 squad. Defo agree with CJ's comments on this
Jones they will say he is versatile but I don't think you really need that in an England squad with at least two players for each position.
He should start with rooney up top. I can see where you're coming from, but you have to reward his form. Wellbeck does well for england, but hasn't been prolific for arsenal, 2 in his last 15 games, sturridge is still coming back to fitness (3 in 12 since his return in Jan), Lambert isn't playing regularly or scoring 3 in 32 apps this season, Rooney is a shoe in. When you consider all that what kind of message would it send out if Kane (26 from 42) was ignored and left with the U21's?
He should definitely go to the euro's if they get there.
Austin and Ings are knocking the door too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
They've already qualified. Why not join the senior squad after that?
Hadn't realised they'd already qualified. Why wait? If he's the best english goalscorer and would improve the england squad, why would you leave him out? Why have an inferior player picked ahead of him? I would start him. I've not heard a decent argument against picking him. He needs to play though, otherwise it would be a waste.
Again, I fully agree that he (and anyone else eligible) should play in the finals.
Not having a go or anything, and I can totally see where you're coming from!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The thing is the senior team qualified for France as soon as the groups were drawn (same as the Swiss) which shows how stupid the situation is. The U21 games are arguably more important to the long term future of the national set up especially with the tourney in the summer. If the squad do well there Kane could well be one of many that would be in the squad in 2016.
it does seem as though missing the U21 Euros will be more down to club than him making an appearance on this current England squad. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/31978988 I would say that his inclusion in the 2016 squad will be decided more by his club form than what he does for the U21s. Like i said early, he should definitely go to the tournament, like wise the others that are eligible (e.g. Shaw and Sterling). do you think they should be in the U21's instead of the full squad?
Completely agree about how stupid the qualifiers is.
Not Sterling as he hasn't been involved within that set up for some time. However Shaw has been. With regard to Spurs I was under the impression U17-U21 tourneys were part of the designated FIFA calendar and clubs can not refuse if a player wants to go.
They've already qualified. Why not join the senior squad after that?
They have not already qualified. Hodgson would be stupid to omit the leading scorer in the Premiership. He does not need 'grooming', he is the finished article. He is the best English goal-scorer, better than Rooney and miles better than Welbeck.
The thing is the senior team qualified for France as soon as the groups were drawn (same as the Swiss) which shows how stupid the situation is.
I'm obviously missing something here, how does that work? Do you mean that we've got an easy group and couldn't possibly mess it up enough to not qualify?
Platini is hell bent on making this tournament bigger, the positives is that we are likely to see some home nations appear, Wales, Scotland and even Northern Ireland are doing well. If Ireland beat Poland then they are back in the hunt. From that perspective it should be more entertaining but could mean a very long tournament however!How do you solve that problem, 2 stages of qualification with the 'big' teams coming in later? Can't see that happening as they fixed it this time round so the teams in bigger markets were in the groups with more games.
It's similar to the Sky / PL issue, while the grounds are still full and people are watching on TV those in charge don't care about anything else.
Platini is hell bent on making this tournament bigger, the positives is that we are likely to see some home nations appear, Wales, Scotland and even Northern Ireland are doing well. If Ireland beat Poland then they are back in the hunt. From that perspective it should be more entertaining but could mean a very long tournament however!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?