I'm not het up, there is women's football and there is men's football.
The point is that they don't say it's Man Utd Women vs Aston Villa Women, it's Man Utd v Aston Villa or "Coming up, the Chelsea Manager". They clickbait it all up. To try and say that places like Sky don't try and force it on you is madness, switch Soccer AM on for a perfect example of how it's forced.
It's not being sexist to point that out, it's not sexist to point out that it's not a very good standard of football either.
It is though. Go on Bbc sport or sky sports you’ll see it. Even on radio 1 this morning a question in the quiz was about England v Latvia. Who cares? They didn’t ask how Hinckley got on and that’s a better standard and probably has more people interested in it
Some proper embarrassing comments on here.
Hope if some of you's have successful daughters you don't tell them they'll never be at the same level as their male counterparts.
Or if they finally find themselves in a position of power, they should just keep quiet about things that upset them...
(This is no shade on the reasonable comments around a 20-0 scoreline / the media coverage.)
Sport is different, male and female bodies are different. Men are bigger, faster, stronger, more aggressive, carry more muscle, carry less fat. Ultimately, men will out perform women in physical activities. (talking athletes here, of course a women will outperform a man who hasn't left his sofa for the past 10 years).
Give women a 500 year training head start on men and the men would still be betterAnd the physiological differences isn't in question. But women are 50 years behind men when it comes to training etc - they've not had the opportunities afforded to men when it comes to training so men have honed their football techniques much more than women.
Regardless of the physiological differences, womens football (and sport in general) should be given a chance to grow and for people to see it in the media.
A number on here have said they're not interested in it...fair enough. Don't get uber offended though that others want to watch it and that it's on the telly.
Yeah no one is saying otherwise.Give women a 500 year training head start on men and the men would still be better
Give women a 500 year training head start on men and the men would still be better
Het up - not you specifically.
Mens Football and there is Womens Football - correct, there is. And one is trying to improve so it becomes better - what's the issue in that?
What damage does it do to you if they don't say it's Man Utd vs Aston Villa Women - seriously, who cares FFS?! And it's not forced - it's just media outlets giving coverage to Womens sport when they previously haven't done so - again, why does that cause some so much issue?
You're right, it's not sexist to say the standard isn't as good as the mens - I never said that and have agreed that it's not as good as mens.
What is sexist (not pointing the finger at you specifically) is to have an attitude that womens football is so shit that it doesn't deserve a place in the media.
You have a daughter right? Wouldn't you want her to emulate/idolise female footballers who are at the forefront of making the womens game better? Personally, I can't see what's wrong with that.
Sport is different, male and female bodies are different. Men are bigger, faster, stronger, more aggressive, carry more muscle, carry less fat. Ultimately, men will out perform women in physical activities. (talking athletes here, of course a women will outperform a man who hasn't left his sofa for the past 10 years).
Give women a 500 year training head start on men and the men would still be better
And the physiological differences isn't in question. But women are 50 years behind men when it comes to training etc - they've not had the opportunities afforded to men when it comes to training so men have honed their football techniques much more than women.
Regardless of the physiological differences, womens football (and sport in general) should be given a chance to grow and for people to see it in the media.
A number on here have said they're not interested in it...fair enough. Don't get uber offended though that others want to watch it and that it's on the telly.
Agreed. And it's important to remember that this was the fault of the quality of the opposition and not Englands fault.
The womens games is 50 years behind the mens game in the UK so needs time to catch up but the WSL and the media deals around it are a great step to helping the womens game grow. Multiple, smaller tournaments based on level is a great idea. They're not going to grow the game like this.
But for those who constantly bemoan the quality of the womens game. I get it - it's not like mens football. But it's not going to improve if people just keep knocking it. They're trying to improve and need help and support to do so...not constant derision.
I for one look forward to my unborn daughter (3 days late...any danger?!) having female footballers as role models. Rather them than a f&*king Kardashian or someone of reality TV...
it takes you a few seconds to realise it’s not the real Utd v Liverpool as they don’t specify.
It is though. Go on Bbc sport or sky sports you’ll see it. Even on radio 1 this morning a question in the quiz was about England v Latvia. Who cares? They didn’t ask how Hinckley got on and that’s a better standard and probably has more people interested in it
The England v Latvia attendance was 10,402, Hinkleys last game was 200. Just because you don't care about it, which is fine, it doesn't mean other people aren't
And coincidentally, 50 years is the length of time womens football was banned in this country. I'm sure it would be a lot further forward if it hadn't been.
Not that it really matters, if girls and women enjoy playing it then good luck.
My dads got radio 2 on and they’re talking about this. They’ve rang a Latvian reporter to find out how the Latvians are feeling about this. Big build up from Jeremy Vine and the reporters response was, no ones arsed. LOL
Why don’t they phone San Marino everytime we whack them? They’re acting like this is such a big deal and saying how good England were. It was embarrassing. I dread the day they win something we’ll be listening to it forever
Some idiot Brummie was there supporting Latvia. Weirdo
Is it a coincide that none of the 2pm Premier League games are on Sky, BT or Amazon on the day the Womens FA Cup Final is on the BBC at 2pm?There's coverage and there's over the top inclusion and trying to force it on people.
The Arsenal keeper was hopeless during the Women's Cup Final yesterdayI watched the game last night and enjoyed it. Okay, Latvia were no match at all, but England do have some very good players at the moment.
The only thing I really see different with women's football is with the keepers and for many of the female keepers, the goal is far too big for them.
Where did you get this nugget of information from? Was it broadcast? Or off social media?Prize on radio 1 this morning was 2 hospitality tickets to the final of the euros at Wembley. I thought this was an excellent prize but to my shock, it was the first time in radio 1 history that not one single person entered the competition. Sad
That can’t be true - I’d enter for free hospitality alone if id have knownPrize on radio 1 this morning was 2 hospitality tickets to the final of the euros at Wembley. I thought this was an excellent prize but to my shock, it was the first time in radio 1 history that not one single person entered the competition. Sad
I listened live like every day lads
Taking the cat for a walk that day so can’t make it
Where did you get this nugget of information from? Was it broadcast? Or off social media?
Just so long as you didn't have to watch the match you mean? Trifle harsh. I'd probably watch if it was freeThat can’t be true - I’d enter for free hospitality alone if id have known
Your guess is as good as mine JDHe's made it up I presume, I *think* an attempt at being funny? I dunno
He's made it up I presume, I *think* an attempt at being funny? I dunno
Poorly worded, I’d probably watch it in between beers, but it’s not an anti woman thing, I’ve had free rugby hospitality before, and I didn’t watch it - can’t stand the sportJust so long as you didn't have to watch the match you mean? Trifle harsh. I'd probably watch if it was free
If the first question was what is the Arnold Clark Cup I'd be out, never heard of it!They're doing a competition on talkSPORT breakfast to win tickets to the Arnold Clark Cup and plenty of blokes with little to no knowledge of women's football are calling up to try and win the tickets. I can only assume it's cause they're free.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?