The notion the football club would ever own a stadium in its own right would be pie in the sky. Any business that suggested it would be unfit for purpose.
Sisu would never have owned the stadium either. CCFC (holdings ) would have owned it and that would have been the correct decision.
The stadium clearly was a white elephant as the documents toddy showed. The council would do anything to stop the club getting it but acknowledged it was a financial basket case they could I'll afford to own
Everything has a price. The Ricoh many on here said was a gold mine without CCFC. A potential for wonderful things. A rival to the NEC.
In the end it was sold for less than sisu paid Freddie Eastwood over his contract with the club.
So, either Freddie Eastwood was worth more than a gold mine of a stadium or the stadium was valued at less than a centre forward who was a flop in his profession. White elephant - you decide.
Bit premature i think, there is still a good chance Sisu could get considerable damages from CCC yet.......none of know how this may play out yet do weHow about answering this instead of trying to make up reasons why you could be right for once?
If the arena was a white elephant how did Wasps manageto raise so much money against it?
If the arena was a white elephant why did Wasps move so far away from their fan base?
SISU moved us to Northampton to devalue the arena. That didn't make it a white elephant. An empty house normally sells for less than one lived in. You thought that SISU were doing it the right way. You thought that they would win the JR. You have insulted people who work for CCC on here. You just seem to have an agenda.
Bit premature i think, there is still a good chance Sisu could get considerable damages from CCC yet.......none of know how this may play out yet do we
Sent from my Harrier Mini from EE using Tapatalk
Still took the time out of your morning to let us know that you don't care. Thanks. I feel better for knowing
Have a day offLook the council are no saints "most" of us no this but the events yesterday is that board room were irrelevant. And guess what it came to nothing? The bashing ccc get isn't fair. The pair are as bad as eachother (sisu +ccc) and with this as the case we are where we are not because sisu are better or ccc are better.
This forum seems to be very pro sisu which is fine but can't really see how. I sit in the middle I dislike both parties here and they are both to blame for this Ricoh stadium shambles. So all these people who are anti sisu or anti ccc then all I will say is 9 times out of 10 it's normally somewhere in the middle.
P.S and the reason this thread hasn't got the hits and posts is because no one cares. It's irrelevant. People care about the pitch and attendances and our new signings and results not over some brunch meeting at a council board room. People have had enough and nothing will change now. Going through the motions springs to mind but yes no one cares.
Have a day offYeah all 2 minutes SBZ. You're very right.
And thank you for your detailed and knowledgable response. I've taken it on Board.
Anyway back on topic shall we?
Have a day off
Have a day off
Have a day off
Is he allowed two days off?
Both sisu and the council have failed the club and us, the fans over the last 8-9 years. As has been previously said, sisu certainly won't be here forever, however the council have ensured that no matter who owns the club will never have an opportunity to own the Ricoh.
It was bizarre that some posters had the time were actually posting 'up the council.'
Bellends
The council have clearly screwed the club over as their hatred of sisu came before anything else. The CET consistently try to undermine the club but strenuously deny it as if people can't read or write nor come to their own opinion. At the same time there hangin on every word wasps say. This being the same papaper who were that against us being in Northampton that they launched a campaign to bring us home. Thats annoying. Its hypocritical. In all fairness you would struggle to make it up. Then to top it off you have people saying move on. What's done is done. Can't see the problem etc etc. I'm sick of it. It's my club. My city. And I do care!
To be fair to the Council here we might have a chance in 2264, so it's not all bad news. Thanks Ann.
Just shows the power of PR. My initial view, and I suspect many others, was that it was about 80% SISU's fault and 20% council. As more evidence emerges, it's certainly not that now.
lol
2013 sisu out, sisu scum, fisher scum, all sisus fault
2015: who cares whos to blame?
If there was no JR coming up, this would not be happening. At the moment we are examining the ethics ( or Lack of ) of one side in a dispute. A bit like watching a penalty shoot out with only one side taking the penalties.
no one ever cheered sisu on though, but many did cheer council on
thats the difference. you must see that?
Well thanks for a debateable response unlike some.
Not really. I see the council lovers and sisu lovers where as I hate both. Grendel was right about the council posters who don't post any more but I also see some posters back sisu when any sort of new argument comes to light.
backing sisu does not mean you love them, its clear council have been far worse than sisu over last few years.
No doubt all the people saying get over it, time to move on etc, would be frothing at the mouth if all this evidence was pointing against Sisu.
Let's be honest Sisu are complete arseholes and have done no end of damage to our club for the last 8 years or so.
Our very own council though have damaged us for the next 250. Utter cretins IMO.
According to wasps the money raised against the ricoh was all down to the wasps brand and not the stadium itself. It was in the article weeman posted. Gilberts been quiet on this thread. Is he still banging on about free press and the right to report news. Blah blah blah. Apart from that one time the CET sat on a story. But it is just a genuine coincidence when the CET release negative press at a positive time
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?