Who would pay their wages?
Imagine Wilshere’s reaction when we offer him 5k a week and has to play through balls for Kastaneer to chase
We couldn't afford the medical bill of one of them, let alone both of them!It’s clear to most of us (& yesterday MR alluded to it) that we are in desperate need for a few more options in our squad.
A couple of injuries and suspensions happen and we down to bare bones.
We need to be competitive.
So is it worth offering short term deals to Daniel Sturridge and Jack Wilshere to boost our squad.
Lots of pros and cons.
Yes or No-thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It’s clear to most of us (& yesterday MR alluded to it) that we are in desperate need for a few more options in our squad.
A couple of injuries and suspensions happen and we down to bare bones.
We need to be competitive.
So is it worth offering short term deals to Daniel Sturridge and Jack Wilshere to boost our squad.
Lots of pros and cons.
Yes or No-thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Regardless of the player, I dont quite get the arguement of "we cant afford the wages".
Free agents, by nature, arn't earning a wage. And if they haven't got a club at this stage in the season, then they're not going to inundated by offers.
So unless they are ready to retire, then our £X a week is surely better than their current £0 a week?
Regardless of the player, I dont quite get the arguement of "we cant afford the wages".
Free agents, by nature, arn't earning a wage. And if they haven't got a club at this stage in the season, then they're not going to inundated by offers.
So unless they are ready to retire, then our £X a week is surely better than their current £0 a week?
Their agents will also be saying that once you sign a cheap deal, you won't be able to then sign the better deal when/if a club with more money comes in with an offer.Regardless of the player, I dont quite get the arguement of "we cant afford the wages".
Free agents, by nature, arn't earning a wage. And if they haven't got a club at this stage in the season, then they're not going to inundated by offers.
So unless they are ready to retire, then our £X a week is surely better than their current £0 a week?
Their agents will also be saying that once you sign a cheap deal, you won't be able to then sign the better deal when/if a club with more money comes in with an offer.
If you have a certain skill and know you could earn £1k+ per week, would you start a new job for a minimum of 12 months say, on £400 a week because you were momentarily unemployed?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
As a footballer with their ability, youve got to back yourself that with injuries and Covid etc, come January you SHOULD be able to pick up a lower half Premier league deal. To sign for a Premier league club for 6 months would still make them at least treble what we could offer them for 12 months.Depends on how long you think that "moment" will last. If their skills were still worth that "£1k" per week, then they wouldve still been in employement.
Why does it take an offer from us to start a bidding war for a free agent?
The player's agents will have contacted many clubs months ago. None of those clubs fancied taking the player on (the most likely situation) or they didnt want to match wage demands at that time.
So the player has to decide, do I want to play or not. If he wants to play then previous wage demands cant be taken into consideration now.
Yep we could get Julian Jochim, david Bell and carl Baker back as well.
In a forum full of strange threads this is right up there. Two players who's most recent contract has probably seen them earn around £100k a week being suggested as suitable experience for a team scrapping near the foot of the Championship table, then someone suggesting that we can afford their wages as they're not earning anything currently. I don't think Pochettino is currently applying for jobs at his local Co-op.
Your making the assumption that they've had no offers from elsewhere. Could well be they've had offers with big wages from places like China or the US and are just taking their time deciding what to do. Even if they haven't they might be doing media work which is more attractive to them than a relegation battle.Why does it take an offer from us to start a bidding war for a free agent?
The player's agents will have contacted many clubs months ago. None of those clubs fancied taking the player on (the most likely situation) or they didnt want to match wage demands at that time.
So the player has to decide, do I want to play or not. If he wants to play then previous wage demands cant be taken into consideration now.
It’s clear to most of us (& yesterday MR alluded to it) that we are in desperate need for a few more options in our squad.
A couple of injuries and suspensions happen and we down to bare bones.
We need to be competitive.
So is it worth offering short term deals to Daniel Sturridge and Jack Wilshere to boost our squad.
Lots of pros and cons.
Yes or No-thoughts?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Ha, love that GIF. Never seen it before
Exactly, ridiculousIt’s like saying Eddie Howe would go to Southend United if they made an offer
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?