Eh ?
Eh ?Bayliss could be banned aswell for diving he's got an fa charge aswell tomorrow
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Well they would be if they did that in a live TV game
Looks like a picture of bayliss on bbc and Davies is already in trouble for the stampWhere have you seen that reported?
See how your negative thinking plays against my positivity!Looks like a picture of bayliss on bbc and Davies is already in trouble for the stamp
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Being a Sky blues fans negativity is all I knowSee how you negative thinking plays against my positivity!
I said as that is Bayliss, Davies will get off and you're reading into it that they will both get banned.
Hyam moved out and Davies our mom. Huge missWill miss his aerial presence against their long ball tactics but we have adequate replacements. In truth his judgement for their goal was ridiculous, stand still and the cross doesn't get to Forte so it'll be good to get Willis' pace back in the side, particularly when Grimmer is exposed on that right side.
I think Robins can try and use it to fire up our players.Hyam moved out and Davies our mom. Huge miss
Why does it matter if it’s on live TV or not. If it’s against the rules it’s against the rules and should go punished.
All games are recorded by both sides, so almost every incident will be caught on camera.
Just read about that Rhead incident and it was the same ref as Saturday night, Gavin Ward.
If he’d have been sent off at the time he’d have missed our game and arguably we may have finished higher in league.
Just fucking typical that the ref booked him and nothing could be done, yet Davies gets done cos sky spotted it and now faces a potential ban.
I think it was a bit naughty as Duffy seemed to have a bit of a dig in the melee immediately before.
Will miss his aerial presence against their long ball tactics but we have adequate replacements. In truth his judgement for their goal was ridiculous, stand still and the cross doesn't get to Forte so it'll be good to get Willis' pace back in the side, particularly when Grimmer is exposed on that right side.
Does Grendal think there are no carmeras at games that aren't on Telly? He really is a thick c**t
what’s Wembley got to do with it?
It’s just the way it is
David - show me one (actually two as there is one) incident where a non TV covered game had retrospective action taken.
So muuch intent he wasn't looking at the man?Will be a big blow to lose him but he deserves it, there was clear intent and a really stupid thing to do.
So you change your argument from no one gets banned after the fact in none TV games to actually someone has but show me another?
Stick to cracking one off over DWP benefit cuts
So muuch intent he wasn't looking at the man?
So muuch intent he wasn't looking at the man?
DisagreeAre you basing that on the picture posted in the other thread?
Watch the video, about 1m 10s in.
Coventry 1-1 Notts County
It's so blatant. He looks down and then stands on Duffy's leg.
He appeals and loses and he will miss Wembley.
Thing in his favour is that he said it was an accident and Duffy accepted that.
Definitely should form his defence.
It does look to me as if he maybe meant it, but I don't think it is clear cut.
Got a fair chance of winning an appeal.
Very fair point.It's a blow that he is banned, but it could have been a lot worse if the ref had seen it in real time and given him a straight red, we would have probably lost the game
If it's any kind of ban, yeah it's time for Willis to step up to the plate and lead us like a club captain shouldVery fair point.
I thought most really rated Willis didn't they?
I don't see this as that much of a blow. Yep we will miss him, but at the same time Willis is more than capable.
Watching it, it's the fact that he looks down that is his undoing I believe.I have seen it over, and over, and over again on the highlights link. I STILL don't think it was a deliberate act. There is nothing in there I've seen that will ever convince me it was anything else than a clumsy accident. I STILL say I'd believe it was harsh if it was roles reversed.
Watching it, it's the fact that he looks down that is his undoing I believe.
If he hadn't have looked down there would be no review.
Hmm, thing is, if he looked down, but then made a misjudgement he would surely look back and apologise.But what is to say he didn't look down to try and miss it and just made a misjudgment? I've lost count the amount of times I've done that to our dog when she's lying down in my way ( I can be rather clumsy on my feet sometimes, but she don't half lie in some stupid places!)
At the end of the day, only one person knows if it was truly deliberate. We can only form an opinion based on the footage.
Hmm, thing is, if he looked down, but then made a misjudgement he would surely look back and apologise.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?