Don't be silly, you know we don'tLol what are we buying with the fee? A bag of pork scratchings?
I'd also be disappointed, there's definitely a good footballer in there.If it was Ruben I'd be disappointed unlike some but it would represent a canny bit of business.
Came in free never entirely satisfied the manager and some of the fans
Jones has come in on similar role and we're linked potentially with the twenty year old at blues who's again similar role.
Personally I think he's better than this league and would suit the higher level.
If it is him, good luck Ruben really enjoyed the skill and application,
If it's Stokes a loss no doubt, yet similarly came for free and represents shrewd business out of necessity.
RCC will go no doubt but not yet I wouldn't have thought.
We can't really afford to sell anyone at the moment if we intend to 'build' a team. We get rid of loads of dead wood, fair enough, sold Maddison, fair enough.
But with the squad where it is, if we still have to sell, then it is getting desperate.
You think we could get Clarke for same fee as Lameiras ?The suggestion is they have an interest in a player and will sell him if they can by another for the same fee.
If it's Lameries gone and Leon Clarke in I would be happy.
If it's stokes gone and Bigiamara in i would be less happy.
The suggestion is they have an interest in a player and will sell him if they can by another for the same fee.
If it's Lameries gone and Leon Clarke in I would be happy.
If it's stokes gone and Bigiamara in i would be less happy.
It is making me wonder what the budget is going to be this year. Struggling to see its anywhere close to last year currently, but as has been speculated a fee may be being paid.Having stripped our squad back I would like to think we could build on it now. I know we might have to sell a player a year but I would like to see a team forming that might serve us over the next 2-3 years.
You think we could get Clarke for same fee as Lameiras ?
No but a bit of money on top I think would force bury to bite because of their money situation. It would free up Lameiras' wages as well as Clarke would be on more moneyYou think we could get Clarke for same fee as Lameiras ?
If it were to be Stokes then I can sort of understand it if we are planning on playing wingbacks.
Stokes can't play wingback in my opinion. Not quick enough and not overly brilliant in supporting the forwards.
However, I most definitely could see him in a back three.
Guess if we are selling someone it probably needs to be an asset for any return. Past Stokes I can't really see we have any assets.
Lameiras I do not see as an asset.
Could see Stokes being used as the left sided centre back.If it were to be Stokes then I can sort of understand it if we are planning on playing wingbacks.
Stokes can't play wingback in my opinion. Not quick enough and not overly brilliant in supporting the forwards.
However, I most definitely could see him in a back three.
Guess if we are selling someone it probably needs to be an asset for any return. Past Stokes I can't really see we have any assets.
Lameiras I do not see as an asset.
Yep, me too. I like him when he played there. Looked quite solid.Could see Stokes being used as the left sided centre back.
Yeah so could I, also when the inevitable injuries start to bite he can fill in anywhereCould see Stokes being used as the left sided centre back.
See talk on here of wanting Lameries to go in my mind one of most skillfull players we have. Besides have we not reduced the wage bill sufficently with the clearout we had,
He is one of the most skilful, but also terribly inconsistent.See talk on here of wanting Lameries to go in my mind one of most skillfull players we have. Besides have we not reduced the wage bill sufficently with the clearout we had,
Exactly. That's why I don't get the panic. It's not like we've got someone like Wilson that we must keep hold of.Name one of our players who is consistent apart from RCC and Stokes
He is one of the most skilful, but also terribly inconsistent.
Vincelot isn't really an asset. He's okay, but if we got some money for him i'd be well happyOnly assets we have 1st team wise are:
RCC
Stokes
Vince
I was thinking the only way TM would sanction a sale would be if he was promised that he could use the money for someone.
I do apologise if I'm being cynical but it is now school holidays
What did we do with the maddison money I thought that was going to be re invested
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Good for who ?Really really like stokes but 250k is a good transfer fee.
We just signed him for a 6 figure fee to a four year contract. Are you dumb?Nobody said Jones and we know he had more than a few interested in him before he signed. He would be a player we would miss and i would not be shocked if a champ club are putting money on the table. My money is on Stokes, RCC then Jones.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?