Been trying to get my head round this.
Is the below correct, or am I not following it right?
- The bank have appointed Deloitte to look at ACL's debts.
- The bank could then decide to claim money owed by ACL.
- ACL would go under, and the club would also be forced to pay owed money (rent).
- The club couldn't pay this and would go under too.
Additionally- Where does the 'possible but unlikely' council "bail out" come in? Could they step in when the bank decide to claim all the ACL debts and go "hold on a sec guys, no worries, we'll pay it all"? In order to protect their investment in the stadium (and also the club)?
I miss when chatting about football involved arguing about 4-4-2 vs the diamond...
Essentially what he was doing was trying to make the bank jittery so they put pressure on ACL. Mr Fisher has one agenda here and that is to put ACL into crisis (whether they are or not) so that SISU pick up the stadium on the cheap and have a positive exit strategy. Oh and lest we forget his income is dependent on the success of the strategy. None of this is for the benefit of CCFC, if anyone thinks it is then they are deluding themselves
Been trying to get my head round this.
Is the below correct, or am I not following it right?
- The bank have appointed Deloitte to look at ACL's debts. We don't know this as fact it is only Fisher saying this
- The bank could then decide to claim money owed by ACL. They could but that doesn't mean that this is happening only slimy fisher saying this
- ACL would go under, and the club would also be forced to pay owed money (rent). Could happen if the obove were true but again scaremongering from slimy fisher
- The club couldn't pay this and would go under too. well if they can't pay what is already owed they obviously are running an insolvent business and would be required to call in the reciever
Additionally- Where does the 'possible but unlikely' council "bail out" come in? Could they step in when the bank decide to claim all the ACL debts and go "hold on a sec guys, no worries, we'll pay it all"? In order to protect their investment in the stadium (and also the club)?
I miss when chatting about football involved arguing about 4-4-2 vs the diamond...
A shameful scaremongering tactic from a desperate man
Right, I see. So I do have the right idea, but none of it's necessarily accurate, because Fisher is trying to rock the boat.
Is the 2nd set of bullet points above effectively what Fisher is trying to achieve? Feel like I'm getting somewhere with this now haha.
ACL are going to call in the rent debt.. just wait and see - this is going to be crunch time for CCFC
I 'll put the cones out at the Memorial Park. I have a bath sponge too.
Any volunteers to cut up oranges?
Well, now this is even more confusing!
Here's a different bullet-pointed list. Trying to get my head round everything mk.II!
Does that sound accurate or am I off?
- Fisher is trying to worsen ACL's already problematic financial position by non-payment of rent.
- Concurrently, his press campaign is designed to make the bank think ACL are in even more trouble, [somehow this leads to further worsening of ACL's finanaces].
- Combined, ACL end up in a financial position so terrible that the Higgs Trust or council decide to sell their share on the cheap.
- SISU can then flog the club for a decent sum and get out with some of their money back
The appointment of Deloittes on behalf of the bankers of ACL is really bad news for SISU - whereas before SISU were only really playing brinkmanship with ACL's board - now they have some seriously determined organisations with a vested financial interest involved. These are really going to go after the debts and unlike maybe ACL they won't give a tuppenny-shite about what anyone thinks of them if they screw over CCFC in the process - they are real bastards and will go after CCFC like a rabid dog because after all CCFC doesn't have a leg to stand on over non-payment of the rent. You think there is any chance of any negotiation over this - think again
Pay up SISU or watch Yorkshire Bank wind up CCFC! You are not going to win this battle they have far bigger artillery than you'll ever have
Good lad.
We will make the tactics up as we go along dependent on who turns up with their boots.
Fisher may well know precisely the details about ACL. After all the former chairman KD's company spies on companies financial status. So SISU know EXACTLY how and where to hurt ACL. ACL have the ability to petition courts to bankrupt SISU/ARVO for non payment of debt.
After the way they have behaved they should do precisely that. SISU are basically blackmailing a charity. There comes a time when peoples livelihood take precedence over whether or not a football teaqm can be allowed to play in a particular league!
Total boycott until SISU go is absolutely the right thing to do now.
First thing Yorkshire bank will do is call in the debt, as it's standard business practice. If CCFC then fold they may then get together with Deloites and buy the remenants.
Best things SISU can do if they call in the debt is try to cut a deal with Yorkshire bank as we are worth nothing without the stadium
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?