Could be interesting with what you say about Latins I don’t think a game can carry on with less than 7 players unless that rule has changed.How many can you have at once? What happens if an entire team surrounds the ref like the Latin Americans? Do you go down to a five a side squad with rush backs?
in theory that’s the right way, it would lead to teams telling only the captain to talk so they can only ever lose one at a time I think. But the initial chaos could undo the whole thing. Which always seems to be the way with rule changes: first few overzealous ones get over analysed and the whole thing gets watered down beyond recognition.
Also not sure about a sin bin just for dissent (is that the proposal?) why not any yellow card offence? I just don’t see why we need a special card that’s essentially a yellow.
How many can you have at once? What happens if an entire team surrounds the ref like the Latin Americans? Do you go down to a five a side squad with rush backs?
in theory that’s the right way, it would lead to teams telling only the captain to talk so they can only ever lose one at a time I think. But the initial chaos could undo the whole thing. Which always seems to be the way with rule changes: first few overzealous ones get over analysed and the whole thing gets watered down beyond recognition.
Also not sure about a sin bin just for dissent (is that the proposal?) why not any yellow card offence? I just don’t see why we need a special card that’s essentially a yellow.
As I said on the other thread, wouldn’t a lot of these offences occur with less than 10 minutes left?
Dissent? Not in my experience that happens at any time.
Ah apologies.Yeah, what I meant is does it carry over to the next match? Hard to enforce at Sunday level mind.
A yellow card for dissent has proven it doesn't work. Players don't care, as it very very rarely leads to a red.
We discussed the 7 man thing at a ref conference this week. Essentially the game would be abandoned if you dropped below 7. The directive this year for surrounding refs is that the first player on scene should be booked, if they don't disperse then a second player is then booked and so on and so on until players go away. If you do that with 'blue cards' then it will 100% make them go away after the first one as the players will self police.
Just give a yellow and a sin bin for dissent. Or give a sin bin for all yellows.
Agreed I'm not sure why they added an extra card when all that needs to happen is what we do at lower levels. Yellow and point with both hands to the dugout. Simple!
Not sure on sin bin for all yellows mind! (Be a nightmare at lower levels!)
Think it’s a great idea for grassroots and kids football. For professional games it will just lead to teams bunkering and time-wasting for 10 minutes until they’re back to full strength.This is already being used in Sunday league pretty much via sin bins, just without the blue card. It works far more effectively than a standard yellow ever did as a referee.
I know top refs are supportive of the decision, depending on implementation and laws around it. I think having it for cynical challenges is going to be the harder one to enforce as it's very subjective.
No they haven’t, numerous yellows are given for persistent fouling. It will be used for things like the cynical foul on the half way line where it’s not a clear and obvious scoring opportunity. Good example would have been Kitching at Norwich. Many saying a straight red was harsh but Tbf it was worse than just a yellow. Blue card in that circumstance could have been the best solution.Is it just dissent that’s proposed then? I saw something about cynical fouls as well. Just not sure once you start where you draw the line. Technically all yellows the player has done something pretty bad but not bad enough for a red.
No they haven’t, numerous yellows are given for persistent fouling. It will be used for things like the cynical foul on the half way line where it’s not a clear and obvious scoring opportunity. Good example would have been Kitching at Norwich. Many saying a straight red was harsh but Tbf it was worse than just a yellow. Blue card in that circumstance could have been the best solution.
Is it just dissent that’s proposed then? I saw something about cynical fouls as well. Just not sure once you start where you draw the line. Technically all yellows the player has done something pretty bad but not bad enough for a red.
Think it’s a great idea for grassroots and kids football. For professional games it will just lead to teams bunkering and time-wasting for 10 minutes until they’re back to full strength.
I think it could save time, it could cut out dissent completely like in Rugby.
How much time is wasted in games with players arguing and surrounding referees. I think dissent is the biggest thing in football that needs eradicating. It puts more pressure on referees when there is enough already.
Cal. After being scythed down for the umpteenth time...What’s all this about? Seen something on Twitter talking about FIFA trialling blue cards for dissent. Gives you a ten min sin bin and a yellow and blue equals a red.
Why not just have a yellow? What happens if it’s a keeper? Seems like another example of the rules being made overly complex because refs don’t enforce the ones they have.
Anyway to make this City related, who would be our first player to get a blue card?
Time for England to break away, perfect example of Brexit?Goalie and an outfield player will have to go off and sub goalie on?
What is the order blue yellow red or yellow blue red?
How do they propose to keep the players warm?
Speaks the truth. Why are we trying to complicate everything? There are so many things that need looking at and they come up with this.
Just leave the sport alone.
Sent from my M2101K6G using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?