Free use of Richo (1 Viewer)

jesus-wept · Jun 25, 2013

If ACL offered Otium that tempoary free use of stadium deal, which would keep them as our owners would that be acceptable to us fans.

Sub · Jun 25, 2013

hell no otium and sisu should have nothing to do with ccfc anymore as timmy said 'that boat has sailed !!!'

Jack Griffin · Jun 25, 2013

No, not for me. SISU have to go, they're the problem.

withers · Jun 25, 2013

they should of course go ...and when they go we should erect a two-foot statue of Joy Sepella for passing dogs to relieve themselves on

James Smith · Jun 25, 2013

As Tim said that they won't go back to the RICOH, it's a moot point.

No they're not acceptable, SISU have to go as they've proven they can't be trusted.

Leamington Pete · Jun 25, 2013

I've heard Richo doesn't like being used.

wes_cov · Jun 25, 2013

Leamington Pete said:
I've heard Richo doesn't like being used.

Should have brought him some flowers

torchomatic · Jun 25, 2013

Yes. It keeps us in Coventry, we can get back to playing football then it would be up to JE, GA and PH4 to do their stuff.

jesus-wept said:
If ACL offered Otium that tempoary free use of stadium deal, which would keep them as our owners would that be acceptable to us fans.

jesus-wept · Jun 25, 2013

What about this scenerio then ? Lets say we remain in administration as the season starts which is likely, so it will be Paul Appleton running the football club as he did at the back end of last season, so he takes up ACLs "play for free offer". The club is back up for grabs and low and behold another sisu subsidery becomes a preferred bidder. They get the nod, we are playing at the Ricoh, would ACL boot them out, of course not. So we could be left with sisu back running our club, having a temporary ground, possibly for free while conjuring up other plans.

stupot07 · Jun 25, 2013

The free use of the Ricoh offer was only if we are still in administration.

SkyBlueSwiss · Jun 25, 2013

jesus-wept said:
What about this scenerio then ? Lets say we remain in administration as the season starts which is likely, so it will be Paul Appleton running the football club as he did at the back end of last season, so he takes up ACLs "play for free offer". The club is back up for grabs and low and behold another sisu subsidery becomes a preferred bidder. They get the nod, we are playing at the Ricoh, would ACL boot them out, of course not. So we could be left with sisu back running our club, having a temporary ground, possibly for free while conjuring up other plans.

WRONG:
Paul Appleton has at no time been running the club. Fisher has continued to run the club from Holdings, which Appleton - as their appointed administrator - seems to have full accepted.

Dhinsa's_Millions · Jun 25, 2013

SkyBlueSwiss said:
WRONG:
Paul Appleton has at no time been running the club. Fisher has continued to run the club from Holdings, which Appleton - as their appointed administrator - seems to have full accepted.

Agree with this.

I also don't think another SISU entity would get the club as they will have the same issues arising when it comes to fit and proper persons.

Ignore my previous deleted post!

wingy · Jun 25, 2013

SkyBlueSwiss said:
WRONG:
Paul Appleton has at no time been running the club. Fisher has continued to run the club from Holdings, which Appleton - as their appointed administrator - seems to have full accepted.

I think he did at the outset ,but his opinion changed through the process.

His input in securing the three game deal signified that IMO,However the funding through holdings suggests control ,if that stops and we are suddenly selling players then that is a different suggestion.

wozey · Jun 25, 2013

Not going to happen thou so pointless talking about it

Hugh Jarse · Jun 25, 2013

Jesus H, wonder what Pressley is making of all this?

ccfcway · Jun 25, 2013

Hugh Jarse said:
Jesus H, wonder what Pressley is making of all this?

Its all standard business practise

Nick · Jun 25, 2013

Hugh Jarse said:
Jesus H, wonder what Pressley is making of all this?

Surely he was pretty much aware when he took over? It would have been like getting a job at HMV as they were about to close all of their stores.

Skybluesquirrel · Jun 25, 2013

SkyBlueSwiss said:
WRONG:
Paul Appleton has at no time been running the club. Fisher has continued to run the club from Holdings, which Appleton - as their appointed administrator - seems to have full accepted.

Appleton is running CCFC Ltd. The GS is allegedly with CCFC Ltd. The Memorandum of Association says that CCFC Ltd is the football club. Appleton is running the club.

SkyBlueSwiss · Jun 25, 2013

Skybluesquirrel said:
Appleton is running CCFC Ltd. The GS is allegedly with CCFC Ltd. The Memorandum of Association says that CCFC Ltd is the football club. Appleton is running the club.

Do not agree.
Fisher and Holdings have continued to run the club, make decisions about players, hold forums about the future of the club etc. etc. etc.
How is PA then "running" the club? He isn't - all he is doing is administering CCFC Ltd., which apparently is a shell with nothing but debt in it.

sky blue zam · Jun 25, 2013

stupot07 said:
The free use of the Ricoh offer was only if we are still in administration.

i think people miss the last part of this sentence

Free use of Richo (1 Viewer)

New Member

Well-Known Member

Jack Griffin

Guest

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

New Member

New Member

Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency