Nick
Administrator
If he wasn't a director and was just a caretaker manager he wouldn't have got half as much stick...
If he wasn't a director and was just a caretaker manager he wouldn't have got half as much stick...Tell that to Venus
He sounded a cross between you, RFC and Fisher
.....and something to do with a building company and our training ground looking like going for houses to be built on......If he wasn't a director and was just a caretaker manager he wouldn't have got half as much stick...
If he wasn't a director and was just a caretaker manager he wouldn't have got half as much stick...
Yet people on here say that players are only paid £800 a week, leave as the budget is shit and several managers have turned us down - backed up with nothing - and that's fine.
Exactly, not much of the stick was football related......and something to do with a building company and our training ground looking like going for houses to be built on......
Bollocks. Loss after loss. Playing players out of position. Didn't even have a plan A. Yet we wasn't saying that he didn't have a clue?Exactly, not much of the stick was football related.
Yet people on here say that players are only paid £800 a week, leave as the budget is shit and several managers have turned us down - backed up with nothing - and that's fine.
I didn't say youBollocks. Loss after loss. Playing players out of position. Didn't even have a plan A. Yet we wasn't saying that he didn't have a clue?
I don't think it would put managers off, i can see why it would buyers.Players do leave to earn more money and at least one manager has turned us down. There is no evidence that players and managers won't come to us because of a peaceful 6 minutes protest.
I think the protest could actually show that there is a challenge here, which a good manager may want to take on. None of the fans protesting hates the club or wants the club to die. There is a positive way of looking at this. I watched it on TV, but could sense the passion by what I saw and heard.
I don't think it would put managers off, i can see why it would buyers.
If he wasn't a director and was just a caretaker manager he wouldn't have got half as much stick...
I don't think it would put managers off, i can see why it would buyers.
Do you mean 50p instead of a quid Mart?
You only need evidence if you shout SISU OUT.What evidence is there that any manager would not take a job because the supporters were restless ? None.
Isn't he the bloke who does the music museum?
Yes everyone has the right to have an opinion. But not to have a go at others because their opinion is different unless they are acting like an idiot.At least Mr Chambers created debate on this tired programme.
He made certain basic points
1. The club statement was appropriate and had to be done. Yes this is correct. The club has a duty to prevent invasion onto the pitch during games. Failure to do so again would have severe consequences for the club. Already a fine will be forthcoming. It is unlawful and the club have to act.
2. People were frightened by the protest. He is correct on this. There were some who felt the atmosphere was intimidating. A couple near me looked visibly shaken. I didn't - I thought it was funny - but some didn't.
3. People shouldn't chant "sisu out" as its detrimental. Well, I don't see it having a negative impact. Freedom of speech providing within the law is not a problem. Players should not be distracted. I don't think stopping games is a smart move but chanting and banners go on in several venues.
4. The invasion led to the team conceding a goal. No one has a crystal ball do they so no one can answer. Delays happen - a player could have had a bad injury - the timing was unfortunate but no one knows.
Managers and owners may be put off - his opinion. Not managers I suspect at all. Potential buyers may view as negative but it's all opinion. Nothing massively controversial.
It's his view. I agree with some bits and not others. Still he attends and deserves to give an opinion on these matters without ridicule or insults - does he not?
Yes everyone has the right to have an opinion. But not to have a go at others because their opinion is different unless they are acting like an idiot.
At least Mr Chambers created debate on this tired programme.
He made certain basic points
1. The club statement was appropriate and had to be done. Yes this is correct. The club has a duty to prevent invasion onto the pitch during games. Failure to do so again would have severe consequences for the club. Already a fine will be forthcoming. It is unlawful and the club have to act.
2. People were frightened by the protest. He is correct on this. There were some who felt the atmosphere was intimidating. A couple near me looked visibly shaken. I didn't - I thought it was funny - but some didn't.
3. People shouldn't chant "sisu out" as its detrimental. Well, I don't see it having a negative impact. Freedom of speech providing within the law is not a problem. Players should not be distracted. I don't think stopping games is a smart move but chanting and banners go on in several venues.
4. The invasion led to the team conceding a goal. No one has a crystal ball do they so no one can answer. Delays happen - a player could have had a bad injury - the timing was unfortunate but no one knows.
Managers and owners may be put off - his opinion. Not managers I suspect at all. Potential buyers may view as negative but it's all opinion. Nothing massively controversial.
It's his view. I agree with some bits and not others. Still he attends and deserves to give an opinion on these matters without ridicule or insults - does he not?
1. They have to be seen to act.
2. Sorry, but I still find this incredulous.
3. Detrimental to what? Team performances? Clearly factually wrong, since this has been chanted at every game home and away for what, four seasons or so, during which time we're been on winning runs as well as losing ones. If anything you could take Fisher's line and say the chanting is simply pointless because SISU don't care.
4. So, an empty point then.
Which is what I said.As I say I don't agree with his view on the vocal protests. However a texter than came on and said people buying season tickets are the biggest problem and should look at themselves - that's acting like a real idiot isn't it?
Yes , the club have to make a statement, but TF tub thumping is unnecessary and Imo just inflames the situation.At least Mr Chambers created debate on this tired programme.
He made certain basic points
1. The club statement was appropriate and had to be done. Yes this is correct. The club has a duty to prevent invasion onto the pitch during games. Failure to do so again would have severe consequences for the club. Already a fine will be forthcoming. It is unlawful and the club have to act.
2. People were frightened by the protest. He is correct on this. There were some who felt the atmosphere was intimidating. A couple near me looked visibly shaken. I didn't - I thought it was funny - but some didn't.
3. People shouldn't chant "sisu out" as its detrimental. Well, I don't see it having a negative impact. Freedom of speech providing within the law is not a problem. Players should not be distracted. I don't think stopping games is a smart move but chanting and banners go on in several venues.
4. The invasion led to the team conceding a goal. No one has a crystal ball do they so no one can answer. Delays happen - a player could have had a bad injury - the timing was unfortunate but no one knows.
Managers and owners may be put off - his opinion. Not managers I suspect at all. Potential buyers may view as negative but it's all opinion. Nothing massively controversial.
It's his view. I agree with some bits and not others. Still he attends and deserves to give an opinion on these matters without ridicule or insults - does he not?
You are wrong on point one and cannot speak for anyone else other than yourself on point 2
So now we're down to 2 of yours/Pete's points, the first of which is simply opinion - you and Pete are content to tow the Fisher line, and the second of which you concede is a mute point. Sorry, but again, if people think that the protest was intimidating then I can only assume that they must have been to very few football games outside of Sixfields.
I'm actually finding this a tad silly now.
Was the act of a pitch invasion a criminal act?
Same name different chapIsn't he the bloke who does the music museum?
Yea let's go back to holding up a4 pieces of paper that no one can read, that will get national attention.It was a horrible atmosphere and you did get the feeling it wouldn't take a great deal for it all to kick off. After the first chap got on the pitch people seemed to be making their way from the naughty corner along the stands. Add in that they had scarves round their faces and hoods up to hide their identity I can understand it making some people a bit nervous.
Would probably be a good idea if instead of just dismissing it whoever is organising these things makes sure future action takes the comments into consideration. We need everyone to be united, don't give people, in particular Fisher, an excuse to have a pop at the protests.
So, now we're down to one point, though I'm failing to understand exactly what it is.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?