is a national paper and a national new channel not a main news outlet.So not on any of the main news outlets?
you answered the question for me. Thank you
again on the news? Actual news most people see
I haven’t seen anything on sky or bbc
This is the thing, there are people obsessively posting his tweets.
It's about the content of the tweets embedded, not the account.
I heavily agree on this point. Though given some of the accounts it should be fair game to explore the motivation a bit more.
I'd imagine we wont see him until another dayI think maybe it’s just another example of GIMOC talking shite.
Also his weird "two tier" labour party bollocksI think maybe it’s just another example of GIMOC talking shite.
i'm loving the anti racists aren't working class being "proved" by pictures of no white peopleI'd imagine we wont see him until another day
You've asked that question umpteen times , Nick, and still haven't had a response.This is the kind of thing I have been saying.
Other than Southport, how many mosques have gangs of neo nazis being out attacking?
As for knife, I haven't looked closely yet.
That's the BBC live news feed, just because you haven't seen it doesn't mean it has not been reported.again I mean on the news as in watching it
again I mean on the news as in watching it
You've asked that question umpteen times , Nick, and still haven't had a response.
is this a new rule? we only count things as being reported by the media if we've personally seen it on TV?again I mean on the news as in watching it
Attacks people for not working while watching the TV during the afternoon.is this a new rule? we only count things as being reported by the media if we've personally seen it on TV?
The BBC local news today showed groups of anti racists from yesterday standing around being fairly law abiding, as you'd expect. Quite a lot were wearing masks and scarves to hide their identity . Why, I don't know. Fear or far right retribution at a later date I guess would be the response.So people are saying over and over about nazis and far right people smashing up mosques but nobody can say where it's happened? (I know about the wall at southport).
Yet if somebody posts a video of gangs of people actually out on the street it's racist? (I did see some yesterday, I thought they looked a bit shady so didn't share them).
How about people post some videos of the organised far right gangs of neo nazis that were going to take over the country yesterday? Show them rampaging at mosques?
The BBC local news today showed groups of anti racists from yesterday standing around being fairly law abiding, as you'd expect. Quite a lot were wearing masks and scarves to hide their identity . Why, I don't know.
is this a new rule? we only count things as being reported by the media if we've personally seen it on TV?
Im sorry mate, you cant honestly believe that and post tweets by Barry Stanton and Ashlea Simon.I agree. anyone racist is a wrong’un and deserves all they get
Im sorry mate, you cant honestly believe that and post tweets by Barry Stanton and Ashlea Simon.
The first account is under police surveillance for race-hate and the second is co-leader of a neo-nazi party
Im sorry mate, you cant honestly believe that and post tweets by Barry Stanton and Ashlea Simon.
The first account is under police surveillance for race-hate and the second is co-leader of a neo-nazi party
Attacks people for not working while watching the TV during the afternoon.
exactly. I reported GIMOC’s post linking them up. Talking about packs of black & brown people looking for white people to kill, call me ‘sensitive’ if you like but to me that has to be over a line.
So if I am to then go through the accounts and their previous posting on social media where does it end?
Think you’ve got the wrong end of the stick. I’m saying unless something overtly offensive from one of those accounts is posted in here there’s no need to act. However, you/me/others are then within their rights to highlight it’s a racist/propagandist account without the old “play the ball, not the man” argument.
FWIW I’m not overly fussed about banning/removing of stuff. I don’t have anyone on ignore.
That's you, that is. With , of course, a can of special brew.Attacks people for not working while watching the TV during the afternoon.
Think you’ve got the wrong end of the stick. I’m saying unless something overtly offensive from one of those accounts is posted in here there’s no need to act. However, you/me/others are then within their rights to highlight it’s a racist/propagandist account without the old “play the ball, not the man” argument.
FWIW I’m not overly fussed about banning/removing of stuff. I don’t have anyone on ignore.
Most of the rioters were from the most deprived areas of the UK, probably not interested in politics and didnt even vote, they had nothing to lose anyway. But Sir Kier can now get his far right agenda over and bring in the Police StateThis is the thing.
I'm just saying show the gangs of militant far right neo nazis that everybody has been saying are coming. Where are all of the "fash"?
I don't doubt there have been racist cunts out causing trouble but all of the people so far really aren't that bright or organised enough to arrange thousands of people across the country. (that's not excusing them in the slightest, it saying they arent the militant "fash" that people keep banging on about turning up at mosques).
Again, it's like the COVID stuff all over again.
why because it goes against your narrative?
ffs we’ve had a Labour councillor shouting for throats to be cut.
did you report that? Isn’t that sensitive for you?
I do get that but now things have been pointed out about the account so people can read and make up their own minds about it?
what has been offensive?
Genuine question
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?