TBF blocking anonymous abusive twitter accounts is pretty standard. Same goes for that “Cov Road Safety” weirdo.
Sort of people that write letters in green pen.
If you want politicians to take you seriously on social media use your real name.
The Kings Hill lot are nutters. All over my local FB group as well turning red and waffling about bollocks.
People holding an elected authority to accountTBF blocking anonymous abusive twitter accounts is pretty standard. Same goes for that “Cov Road Safety” weirdo.
Sort of people that write letters in green pen.
If you want politicians to take you seriously on social media use your real name.
The Kings Hill lot are nutters. All over my local FB group as well turning red and waffling about bollocks.
People holding an elected authority to accountfor illegal activity are weirdos?
erm, who are 'labour remainers' moving to?I think most of the recent movement has been Labour remainers actually. The gains have generally been at the expense of the LDs
erm, who are 'labour remainers' moving to?
No. Weirdos ranting anonymously on twitter are weirdos.
Use your real name and people will take you seriously. That’s like Twitter 101.
Those two accounts are anonymous low follower accounts that mostly spit bile and conspiracy theories.
So, which one are you?
Only Chuka Umanna can flip on a whim.
so they're 'moving' from labour to labour?Labour. Back from LDs.
Fair amount of the remain vote is undecided and breaking for Labour as well.
Edit: when I say “Labour” I mean that’s who they voted for in 2017.
so they're 'moving' from labour to labour?
No. Weirdos ranting anonymously on twitter are weirdos.
Use your real name and people will take you seriously. That’s like Twitter 101.
Those two accounts are anonymous low follower accounts that mostly spit bile and conspiracy theories. Prime blocking material.
As I say, they come across as the red faced old men that would write lengthy letters in green pen to their councillors whining about dog shot or something with umpteen references to the Nazis in them. The sort any councillor just throws in the bin.
So, which one are you?
Eh?
How about no? You want to arrest me for attending a meeting? Why?
Also, arrestables are trying to get arrested, not sure you’ve thought this through.
Attending a meeting is not the same as gluing yourself to a bus or disrupting people going about their daily lives as per last time. I'd happily arrest you though for simply being an annoying cock on every topic.
you might want to look at Purdues sales and marketing strategy in the States and how they pushed oxycontin.
I'm not saying that would happen here but they never would have succeeded without corrupt doctors, (and some naïve ones as well) in the US.
It was quite funny on 5Live interview this morning. Made a huge cock-up told people to vote Labour lolI see Chuka is positioning himself to take over the Lib Dems - such a whore.
It'd give us all a break though. Every cloud...Eh?
How about no? You want to arrest me for attending a meeting? Why?
Also, arrestables are trying to get arrested, not sure you’ve thought this through.
Maybe Bojo is her secret hero?And the disaster zone starts again.
Will someone pop a question in to a hustings about what they would do about bullying in the workplace.
It was quite funny on 5Live interview this morning. Made a huge cock-up told people to vote Labour lol
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Well...unless we ditch NICE & Medicines Management teams, that will not be possible. Pharma push all they like in the UK but if a drug isn't NICE &/or especially locally approved...Drs tend to reserve them for last resort use in the UK
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Attending a meeting is not the same as gluing yourself to a bus or disrupting people going about their daily lives as per last time. I'd happily arrest you though for simply being an annoying cock on every topic.
Yes they would have to eliminate NICE which is sometimes controversial - but I actually have a fair amount of faith in. It has been known to recommend drug use off-label as well as deny recommendation when all the available (weak?) Evidence suggests a benefit - but at an inflated price.Could be wrong but my understanding was the whole point is we’d have to ditch NICE is such a scenario.
Going off “It also wants to end the ability of Nice, which regulates medicines in the UK, to block drugs that it does not consider value for money, and it wants a system more favourable to extending monopoly rights to US drug firms than currently exists in the UK.”
From this: A US trade deal could cost the NHS tens of millions. My investigation shows how | Antony Barnett
Or is that something different?
Accept that’s Pharma lobbying but that’s basically what the US govt would be taking the lead from.
A Tory wankers countryWhat kind of world do we live in where looking into whether it's feasible to improve workers' conditions is a vote loser...?
Awful performance from Sajid Javid this morning on 5Live, I thought.
I didn't catch it all, but the host was asking him about the Dispatches programme and poor families living in poverty and without heating and having to sleep in their bed with their coats on, and instead of making any apology at all, a we got was 'Labour, Labour, Labour.'
He couldn't even say he was saddened by it all. The host kept saying 'you have been in power for nearly 10 years, what about YOU, the Conservative government, YOUR record, but he just seemed to keep banging on about Labour.
So many politicians behave in this way and I have seen it from all sides. I hate this sort of thing. No-one wants to take any responsibility and all they do is blame the opposition.
After 10 years in government it is about time the Conservatives took some ownership of what has gone on the past decade.
Slag off Labour, or proudly announce about putting things back (i.e. police numbers) to what they were before they cut them.A party redundant of ideas... just slag off Labour.
Do we though ? Most voters know very little about candidates and vote for the party they represent, that's my take on it anyway.Like it or not, we elect the individual not the political party.
The prospective MPs character, ethics and morality is a major contributing factor when the public decide whom to represent them or not in Parliament. It just doesn't come down to just which colour rosette they are wearing.
Unfortunately it works if you have the press onside, nothing but negative campaigning from the tories, definitely taking lessons from Trump.I know Dom thinks it is fine, the kind of leaflets the Conservatives are putting out, but if I was a floating voter I wouldn't want to hear why I shouldn't be voting Labour, I would be wanting to hear why I SHOULD be voting Tory.
Making the point the other party is crap is not really selling yourself at all.
It's getting a bit like the US, where it is just a constant slating of the opposition
Most like the simplicity of the message. We are not a mature democracyI have been undecided before and when I have had a leaflet from a party simply slating the opposition, all it has done has made me angry with that party and much mess likely to vote for them.
I am getting equally pee'd off with Get Brexit Done from Boris and Stop Brexit from Swinson.
Do we though ? Most voters know very little about candidates and vote for the party they represent, that's my take on it anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?