Because I understand what has been going on?
Everyone now has a worse off pension. Yet you want 58 billion given to women because their pension age was brought into line with mens.
Depends which way you look at it. Women want equal rights. And they should have equal rights. But they don't want equal rights when it doesn't benefit them.
So if they get the money for having their state pension raised how about men as theirs was also raised.
A) The government didn’t, councils did.But they did provide 200,000 temporary accommodations for the homeless. Does this count? It only costs billions a year which is wasted.
The actual facts are that this well documented liar claimed not to be one (another lie in itself) so the audience had to be given time to pick themselves up of the floor. He answers deliberately to outrage so he has less time to speak because the reality is he has nothing to say.Why? Its pointing out actual facts
Even Grendel said Johnson got an easy ride and he did. He got a ranty student who descended rapidly from anythiung approaching coherance, and he was allowed to swap every answer around to Get Brexit Done.The actual facts are that this well documented liar claimed not to be one (another lie in itself) so the audience had to be given time to pick themselves up of the floor. He answers deliberately to outrage so he has less time to speak because the reality is he has nothing to say.
The French government has a bigger stake in British railways (Network Rail aside). Seem to remember reading somewhere that the French government was also a recipient of British government handouts to failing franchises because of this.(and in some cases, corporations that are nationalised public utilities in their own countries)
A lead of 47% may have been sufficient to hand the Tories a handsome majority to the Tories in the past, and it certainly worked in the Thatcher years where they polled around 42%, but I'm afraid that what you fail to grasp is that we are no longer in a two party system. 2017 was a slight deviation from that, where Labour and the Conservatives gained over 82% of the vote but now more than ever it is looking like we will see other parties gain a large percentage of the vote again, throwing up all sports of distortions.May not yes. But you state it as a certainty.
The lead is so big that Labour would need zero votes in some places to be able to compete in others. The Tories are said to have nearly half of the voters. And there is more than two parties.
No deal? There is already an agreement between the EU and Boris. Keep up.
Hmmm, 83 saw a massive Tory majority as much because three parties (well, two parties and an alliance of two parties, for the anally retentive) took sizeable shares of the vote. Alliance weren't that far behind Labour at all in percentage terms.A lead of 47% may have been sufficient to hand the Tories a handsome majority to the Tories in the past, and it certainly worked in the Thatcher years where they polled around 42%, but I'm afraid that what you fail to grasp is that we are no longer in a two party system.
Possibly, but I'd guess not because the Falklands had already been won by that and so despite the initial unpopularity, it was a great source of pride. The outcome of Brexit at this stage is ambiguous to say the least, and there's certainly not a unanimous verdict about its merits.Hmmm, 83 saw a massive Tory majority as much because three parties (well, two parties and an alliance of two parties, for the anally retentive) took sizeable shares of the vote. Alliance weren't that far behind Labour at all in percentage terms.
Maybe Brexit is 2019's Falklands...
Its clever I'd say
Thought Boris smashed the leaders debate Friday night after how hostile and bias the audience was, was a disgrace how many times he was interrupted
Just one question. Why should anyone be forced to sell something at well under the true value?Then hopefully you'll take my criticism that constantly setting yourself up as arbiter of the truth, and stater of facts is not a good look, especially when it comes to perspectives.
There is one ideology that says oh no, firm moves holding company overseas, that means evil state intervention is going after innocent investors and trying to restrict their dividends - competition will not work if that happens.
The argument for nationalisation of public uitilities has been made many times before - I even made it in my response to theferret earlier. Any self respecting lefty knows that answer, even if they moderate where they choose to draw the line, such as CvD on water rather than power.
Personally, I consider evidence of utility companies putting investors first ahead of public service to be an excellent argument as to why they should be renationalised, and why their role should be skewed towards providing a service and profit to the state, rather than profit to foreign corporations (and in some cases, corporations that are nationalised public utilities in their own countries).
That's all I'll have to say on the matter, because I don't have enough hours in the day to constantly argue over misreadings. FACT
It most probably did him a favour.
Interesting you are bringing the Tory's track record on house building into the debate .......It doesn't stand up to srcutiny "The Tories' 2015 manifesto committed the party to building 200,000 'Starter Homes', to be sold at a 20% discount and exclusively available to first-time buyers under the age of 40". Number of homes built under this scheme....a big fat 0. No homes built under flagship 2015 Tory housing pledge, watchdog finds
I agree with this. But it has been more than women that have been screwed. And the problem is we are all easy targets with pensions, both private and state.No, you don't.
It isn't about the equalisation it's about the implementation of it. It was entirely unreasonable of the coalition government to speed up the implementation given that many women had planned their retirement on the basis of the implementation period agreed in 1995.
Every chuffin election the DM publishes this inaccurate tired article having a dig at the BBC bias. Crack pot journalism at its finest. People should be embarrassed to read or refer to this comic.He didn't have a chance to even speak, every other leader had plenty of time however Boris didn't
BBC faces bias row after Boris Johnson is confronted by hostile audience on Question Time | Daily Mail Online
You can get a big majority with only 35% of the vote. This is the problem with FPTP.Possibly, but I'd guess not because the Falklands had already been won by that and so despite the initial unpopularity, it was a great source of pride. The outcome of Brexit at this stage is ambiguous to say the least, and there's certainly not a unanimous verdict about its merits.
Excuse me. Cut out your normal crap. Jist point out a single time I have ever praised or said anything good about Boris.Only you, Dim and G will argue he comes out of that looking good.
Would you like to make a comment on the Labour history on the subject? They are as bad as each other.Interesting you are bringing the Tory's track record on house building into the debate .......It doesn't stand up to srcutiny "The Tories' 2015 manifesto committed the party to building 200,000 'Starter Homes', to be sold at a 20% discount and exclusively available to first-time buyers under the age of 40". Number of homes built under this scheme....a big fat 0. No homes built under flagship 2015 Tory housing pledge, watchdog finds
The Tory's have tried to avoid placing these sort of restriction on major volume housebuilders such as Berkeley and numerous others despite them recording their highest ever margins/profits - and unsuprisingly housebuilders have major links to donations and lobbying of the Conservative party.. Disgusting!
Except when they do an article on the side of remain or anti Tory. Then it is acceptable. As has been shown several times before on here.Every chuffin election the DM publishes this inaccurate tired article having a dig at the BBC bias. Crack pot journalism at its finest. People should be embarrassed to read or refer to this comic.
My name isn't Dim you meltOnly you, Dim and G will argue he comes out of that looking good.
My name isn't Dim you melt
Haha very funnyHow did you know it was about you then?
Would you like to make a comment on the Labour history on the subject? They are as bad as each other.
Every chuffin election the DM publishes this inaccurate tired article having a dig at the BBC bias. Crack pot journalism at its finest. People should be embarrassed to read or refer to this comic.
Its clever I'd say
Btw, have you read any of the manifestos yet?
Thought Boris smashed the leaders debate Friday night after how hostile and bias the audience was, was a disgrace how many times he was interrupted
Thats just bollocks dreamer and you know it, he was heckled and interrupted throughout unfairly. He got interrupted because he wasn't answering question and answering in a confrontational, antagonistic manner. It got that hostile because of his approach that led to the crowd getting more and more exasperated.
Obviously, both parties seem to be growing money trees however labours is extraordinary
Conservatives is much more sensible than nationalising everything
Thats just bollocks dreamer and you know it, he was heckled and interrupted throughout unfairly
Well judging by the audience selected yesagain, who is the audience manager for question time? Do you seriously think she favours Corbyn?
Well judging by the audience selected yes
How can you not agree that the audience was bias towards Corbynyou're very, very wrong. Look her up, Alison Fuller-Pedley. Look at what she got reprimanded by her bosses for.
How can you not agree that the audience was bias towards Corbyn
The gap between Labour pledges and what they intend to raise to meet it is far narrower than the Tories. And the Tories missed loads of existing commitments out of their manifesto. What ever magic money tree forest you think labour needs the Tories needs to many acres bigger. They’re either not ending austerity or their manifesto isn’t worth wiping your arse on.Obviously, both parties seem to be growing money trees however labours is extraordinary
Conservatives is much more sensible than nationalising everything
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?