Well they're an indirect tax anyway aren't they.Oh okay. Basically my point was, labour want to scrap car parking charges, which is great for patients and families etc.
But the massive revenue loss to an under pressure NHS, not a good idea really is it?
Why should we wait 5 years, we haven't had to this time.Oh I quite agree and that's why I said in 5 years you can vote against them again if you're not happy.
One sentence that tells you exactly who wins with Brexit and who doesn't....
Just got the Conservative leaflet through the door and I see that the lies continue, apparently every vote for May will strengthen Britain's hand in Brexit negotiations. Do people actually fall for this rubbish? There is also little that is stable about her, she is weak and will get thoroughly shown up once negotiations over Brexit begin.
What does the labour leaflet say? Does it mention Jeremy Corbyn?
Unsurprisingly yes, it does...the usual weak leadership soundbites.
Oh which constituency is that then? Mine doesn't mention him at all
Both my parents will be 65 this year and have always voted Labour since living here.
I was more referencing the sweeping generalisation of the advert, this post shows how far off the mark it is.
Just like the "vote Leave, then die and let the Remain voters deal with it" adverts I saw on Facebook.
Is that the 4 page thing? I started reading that and thought it was a parody at first and was going to be another party or someone campaigning against them. Doesn't mention a single policy and says strong and stable a ridiculous number of times.Just got the Conservative leaflet through the door and I see that the lies continue
Yes it does, it also mentions local and national policies. Something sadly lacking from the Conservatives so far. At least I've had something off them though. Nothing from the Lib Dems or Greens so far.What does the labour leaflet say? Does it mention Jeremy Corbyn?
Its a valid point, well the ruin the country is debatable but the influence over 65s have is disproportionate. There was a breakdown of polls by age group earlier in the week and its neck and neck until you get to the over 65s. The younger generation have become disenfranchised as they feel nobody represents them. This is where Labour have dropped the ball massively with Corbyn. They could have mobilised that group who were right behind him in the leadership campaign."Almost all 65+ people will vote, 25% 18-25 year olds won't, that's about 2,000,000 votes! Don't let the Tory voting old people ruin our country!
Is that the 4 page thing? I started reading that and thought it was a parody at first and was going to be another party or someone campaigning against them. Doesn't mention a single policy and says strong and stable a ridiculous number of times.
Yes it does, it also mentions local and national policies. Something sadly lacking from the Conservatives so far. At least I've had something off them though. Nothing from the Lib Dems or Greens so far.
Its a valid point, well the ruin the country is debatable but the influence over 65s have is disproportionate. There was a breakdown of polls by age group earlier in the week and its neck and neck until you get to the over 65s. The younger generation have become disenfranchised as they feel nobody represents them. This is where Labour have dropped the ball massively with Corbyn. They could have mobilised that group who were right behind him in the leadership campaign.
I had a very nice Ad on my Facebook to get young people to register to vote feed along the lines of:
"Almost all 65+ people will vote, 25% 18-25 year olds won't, that's about 2,000,000 votes! Don't let the Tory voting old people ruin our country!
Register and vote Labour to save the country!"
Me too!I started reading that and thought it was a parody at first and was going to be another party or someone campaigning against them.
It certainly felt that under the last Labour government, the UK became much more progressive and outward looking. Under May the country is quickly going backwards...her boys' and girls' jobs crap says it all.
That was the good work of John Majors government that allowed that to happen. The fact Tony Blair and Gordon Brown failed to to build sustainable growth of that foundation is actually a major failure. Let's also not forget that it was Blair and Brown who relaxed governance of the banking sector so much that it promoted the greed and recklessness that delivered the banking crisis and that's a mess we're still paying for.
I'm not talking about ££.
Yea, they didn't regulate banks as much as they should have. The Tories complained the opposite at the time.That was the good work of John Majors government that allowed that to happen. The fact Tony Blair and Gordon Brown failed to to build sustainable growth of that foundation is actually a major failure. Let's also not forget that it was Blair and Brown who relaxed governance of the banking sector so much that it promoted the greed and recklessness that delivered the banking crisis and that's a mess we're still paying for.
Yea, they didn't regulate banks as much as they should have. The Tories complained the opposite at the time.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Thats the same poll that was posted before. its not 68% scything they agree we should leave, want to leave or would vote leave if there was another election. Its 68% saying the government has a duty to apply the result of the vote. A very different thing, surprised its not much higher to be honest.
No, don't be stupid, we all regret voting to leave remember!
We haven't left yet... the fun starts then.....
Thats the same poll that was posted before. its not 68% scything they agree we should leave, want to leave or would vote leave if there was another election. Its 68% saying the government has a duty to apply the result of the vote. A very different thing, surprised its not much higher to be honest.
That would give a green light to every member state to leave/join as and when they feel like it which is never going to happen.We just need someone to come to their senses and sort out single market and freedom of movement. Then give it 20 years and we'll be back in. Jobs a goodun.
I know.
Also in 10 years, it will only have been 10 years since Article 50. We must wait at least another 25 following that if things aren't fucked, right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?