Heard an interesting take yesterday. Apparently a lot of white surpremists think whites are superior because whites are the next stage of evolution. However the evidence is essentially opposite. Essentially a white person is a black person minus something or actually black people are another step forward in evolution. Not saying that there’s any truth in any of that for one minute but found it an interesting counter argument as given opportunity black people can and do achieve anything a white person can. However for instance I can’t ever see a white person breaking the 100mtr world record again.
It's nothing more than a genetic change to physical appearance that occurred from colonising new habitats when we left Africa. Same as people in colder regions tend to be shorter than those in hot ones to conserve heat.
Having said that you would think black people would be from colder regions as it better absorbs heat while white reflects it.
The athletic prowess thing may also be down to other factors - African people haven't had as much access to things like transport etc over the last few centuries and have more natural predators in their environment therefore had to retain more of their physical abilities to be a survivor. We've got more sedentary.
When you have a mixed race child their skin colour tends to be lighter than the dark skinned parent and darker than the light skinned parent. So neither is a 'dominant' gene.
Don't think the Cecil Rhodes statue will suffer the same fate because it's not as accessible - it's high up a building rather than on a plinth.
But I think they must be having serious thought to taking it down and replacing it.
Certainly when it comes to explosive power in sports black people tend to have higher concentrations of fast twitch muscle than white. With distance running many years ago I watched a documentary on Kenya’s long history of success in distance running and a few Kenyan coaches and athletes in it used the phrase that if a Kenyan was going somewhere they were running, Forest Gump stole it.It's nothing more than a genetic change to physical appearance that occurred from colonising new habitats when we left Africa. Same as people in colder regions tend to be shorter than those in hot ones to conserve heat.
Having said that you would think black people would be from colder regions as it better absorbs heat while white reflects it.
The athletic prowess thing may also be down to other factors - African people haven't had as much access to things like transport etc over the last few centuries and have more natural predators in their environment therefore had to retain more of their physical abilities to be a survivor. We've got more sedentary.
When you have a mixed race child their skin colour tends to be lighter than the dark skinned parent and darker than the light skinned parent. So neither is a 'dominant' gene.
Got a colleague now texting me telling me the whole thing is staged, it’s the Freemasons paying crisis actors with the riots being people paid by communists in order to topple Trump. Anything I say otherwise is because I “believe everything the media say”.
One of these people will shoot me in a future civil war, I’m sure of it.
Heard an interesting take yesterday. Apparently a lot of white surpremists think whites are superior because whites are the next stage of evolution. However the evidence is essentially opposite. Essentially a white person is a black person minus something or actually black people are another step forward in evolution. Not saying that there’s any truth in any of that for one minute but found it an interesting counter argument as given opportunity black people can and do achieve anything a white person can. However for instance I can’t ever see a white person breaking the 100mtr world record again.
All of this presupposed some “plan” on which there is a next step, or that you can rank humans in a league table of some sort. Both of which are utter nonsense.
You can’t have a “next step” evolution isn’t some linear path to an end goal it’s continual adaption to a changing environment. Similarly black people can be better at running but that doesn’t make them a better human.
Doesn't sound interesting, its sounds like absolute bollocks and you really shouldn't be listening to any thoughts of 'white supremists'.Heard an interesting take yesterday. Apparently a lot of white surpremists think whites are superior because whites are the next stage of evolution. However the evidence is essentially opposite. Essentially a white person is a black person minus something or actually black people are another step forward in evolution. Not saying that there’s any truth in any of that for one minute but found it an interesting counter argument as given opportunity black people can and do achieve anything a white person can. However for instance I can’t ever see a white person breaking the 100mtr world record again.
Not quite sure what he hoped to achieve by posting this hot take.Doesn't sound interesting, its sounds like absolute bollocks and you really shouldn't be listening to any thoughts of 'white supremists'.
there's more genetic diversity in Africa than their is in the rest of the world together.Certainly when it comes to explosive power in sports black people tend to have higher concentrations of fast twitch muscle than white. With distance running many years ago I watched a documentary on Kenya’s long history and a few Kenyan coaches and athletes in it used the phrase that if a Kenyan was going somewhere they were running, Forest Gump stole it.
Does Jimmy White have a statue?We should have a sweepstake as to what is the next statue to fall
I think Robert Peel ticks a lot of boxes but Clive of India looks vulnerable
Doesn't sound interesting, its sounds like absolute bollocks and you really shouldn't be listening to any thoughts of 'white supremists'.
Not sure how you’ve garnished your reply from what I posted. The whole point of the post is that the white supremacy is based on bollocks. Also I wasn’t listening to the thoughts of white supremacist I was listening to the counter argument to a white supremacy argument from someone who isn’t a white supremacist.Doesn't sound interesting, its sounds like absolute bollocks and you really shouldn't be listening to any thoughts of 'white supremists'.
A bit like your entire life then.To be fair Tony is living proof that white supremacy really is a work of fiction
All of this presupposes some “plan” on which there is a next step, or that you can rank humans in a league table of some sort. Both of which are utter nonsense.
You can’t have a “next step” evolution isn’t some linear path to an end goal it’s continual adaption to a changing environment. Similarly black people can be better at running but that doesn’t make them a better human.
Ha ha ha. Quick, someone pull down another statue and let’s see if Tommy Robinson’s head physically explodes
Thanks mate - if it causes offense and enough people want it taken down, I can't see a problem as long as its done through the right channels. Again, put it in a museum, somewhere with some explanation of why things were like they were. Mankind has moved on, people need to accept that.Don't think the Cecil Rhodes statue will suffer the same fate because it's not as accessible - it's high up a building rather than on a plinth.
But I think they must be having serious thought to taking it down and replacing it.
Ffs. If people ever regain their sanity they will one day understand how much Trump has undermined so much.Just when you thought things couldn't get weirder.
Having said that you would think black people would be from colder regions as it better absorbs heat while white reflects it.
The athletic prowess thing may also be down to other factors - African people haven't had as much access to things like transport etc over the last few centuries and have more natural predators in their environment therefore had to retain more of their physical abilities to be a survivor. We've got more sedentary.
I laughed.Just when you thought things couldn't get weirder.
Oxford Council have written to the university to asking them to apply for planning permission to remove the statue of Cecil Rhodes. Its listed so needs permission to remove it but they've made their feelings pretty clear by making the request.In much better news, another relic from a shameful era gone, in a way we can all surely respect.
London slavery statue removed from outside museum
Far more black people are killed by other black people (in the USA) than by white people.
So if 'Black Lives Matter', why do black people keep killing black people?
Over the last weekend in May, a three day holiday in the US, 85 people were shot and 24 killed, according to the University of Chicago Crime Lab.
Most were black people shot by other black people.
he is a c**tYou are an absolute racist c**t. It's a stain on this forum that you havent vèn banned
Far more black people are killed by other black people (in the USA) than by white people.
So if 'Black Lives Matter', why do black people keep killing black people?
Over the last weekend in May, a three day holiday in the US, 85 people were shot and 24 killed, according to the University of Chicago Crime Lab.
Most were black people shot by other black people.
Yep it was their allergy to lead that killed themNah, they all died of pre-existing medical conditions too
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?