David O'Day
Well-Known Member
wow indeed
wow indeed
Then you'd need a tiny line to work out if it had actually crossed.Whole ball, middle of the white line.
Whole ball, middle of the white line.
If you look closely the defender heads it, it rolls along the line and then starts to go in slightly more. I think they have stopped it exactly when the ball is furthest over.it hits their player and rolls back before they freeze frame it in that video
Ah, I think that leaves it open to interpretation then though, where is the middle of the line.
Better off as it is.
it hits their player and rolls back before they freeze frame it in that video
If you look closely the defender heads it, it rolls along the line and then starts to go in slightly more. I think they have stopped it exactly when the ball is furthest over.
simply not true, video shows thatIf you look closely the defender heads it, it rolls along the line and then starts to go in slightly more. I think they have stopped it exactly when the ball is furthest over.
I'm starting to believe the Grendel slander on being a boozer might be right too as you'd have to be seeing double with all this proof.Fucking hell, Grendel is actually right about something, you’re properly mental.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
everyone is right about you as wellFucking hell, Grendel is actually right about something, you’re properly mental.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ok thenI'm starting to believe the Grendel slander on being a boozer might be right too as you'd have to be seeing double with all this proof.
Dave, it's the ball on the left mate.
it is after it hits their playerAre my eyes deceiving me….when the still with ball occurs is a fraction after the point the ball bounces off defenders head. Still no goal (by a millimetre), fraction before over line
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are my eyes deceiving me….when the still with ball occurs is a fraction after the point the ball bounces off defenders head. Still no goal (by a millimetre), fraction before over line
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We have to have the ball over the line rule or every game would finish 90 - 90Then the paint would be wrong technically.
I think the whole ball whole line thing is a stupid rule but it is the rule.
Give it up. You’ve had your 15 minutes of famethe ball rolls backwards before they free it thanks i win
The line is part of the penalty area. Yes the rule includes all linesMiddle of the line for me. It’s not logical, just feels wrong to me.
Genuine question is that the rule for all lines? Is a foul a mm into the pen area like a pen?
That still is after the ball has come back towards the line after hitting his back.Now do an angle from the side and you will see the top of the ball is level with the line. As much as we'd love it to be a goal it's not. There's literally technology for it
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Well yeh it was worth discussion because how many times have we grabbed a late equaliser when we have momentum and the crowds and players smell blood and are mad for it. Turns out to be the right decision anyway but to say it wasn’t worth discussing is sillyDoes it matter as we were dog shit.
I know I'm clearly being out voted here, but my mind is blown.
Are you lot the same people that scream when the ball isn't in the correct place for a corner as well?
It's not where the ball touches the floor. And all the images posted the ball is in the air.
No goal.
Why did they slow it down after it was coming back away from the goal?
The replay on TV is irrelevant. The technology was working and got it right. There's no real argument to be had. Shows how deceptive an angle can be as looked miles over on the live stream last night.
TheQuest still is too late in the incident. It’s a goal when it hits the back of the grounded player and bounces down, well over the line, before rolling back toward the goal line and being cleared as it approaches the line from inside th goal. The point at which Quest have made the assessment. So no, I haven’t ignored it, I have discounted it because they haven’t done it correctly.Have you just chosen to ignore the camera angle above from quest that proves its not a goal?
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Didn’t know from behind the goal last night. If the ref’s watch doesn’t buzz (and he was clearly repeatedly telling the players of both sides this) there’s no way he can give a goal.
Much more pivotal was the decision to not give a penalty for the blatant foul on Tavares - the ball had gone but he was cleaned out. If (and only if) we scored a penalty with 15 minutes to go we would have had significant momentum.
Apart from that the Ref did quite well, and Hull were excellent.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?