Skybluebaz
Member
Just seen that he has been charged with a breech of rule e3. Social media comment?
anyone know anything
anyone know anything
E3 is a lot broader than social media commentsI hate spell checker.
title should of courose be.
Godden FA charge
Rule E3 (1) relates to conduct and states:
“A Participant shall at all times act in the best interests of the game and shall not act in any manner which is improper or brings the game into disrepute or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour”.
I know we have Phase 1 elites and Phase 2 scum but I did wonder who the golden fan was.I hate spell checker.
title should of courose be.
Godden FA charge
Christ
Thanks shmmeee. I gave up reading that thread on Saturday So hadn’t seen yesterday’s post. Surely this opens up a massive can of worms if players are going to get retrospective charges For simulation.
I am the golden fan, and my wife is too.I know we have Phase 1 elites and Phase 2 scum but I did wonder who the golden fan was.
Decent cross on him to be fair. Can do a job out wide.
.....texture like sunGolden fan.View attachment 22136
Decent cross on him to be fair. Can do a job out wide.
It’s happened before. It’s rare. It’s nonsense.
Whilst I agree with decision that he dived, I’m not keen on the punishment after the fact. But I don’t think it will open up a can of worms.
There wasn’t much publicity around the WBA one.I think could open cans of worms this is going attract publicity and attention. and I bet within a month there will be a number of complaints & not necessarily just re: penaltys. Whatever we think about dive or no dive a photo on SBT clearly shows a Fulham player with a leg sticking out.
That happens every week somewhere.
There wasn’t much publicity around the WBA one.
You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.He’s on a different planet. Nobody outside of CCFC fans will be bothered
Different case
You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.
Thanks shmmeee. I gave up reading that thread on Saturday So hadn’t seen yesterday’s post. Surely this opens up a massive can of worms if players are going to get retrospective charges For simulation.
It’s only happened once in the Championship to my knowledge. This game would have been on TV too
Leeds' Patrick Bamford banned for two games after Aston Villa controversy
Patrick Bamford has been handed a two-match ban by the FA for successfully deceiving a match official during Leeds controversial 1-1 draw with Aston Villa last weekend.www.google.co.uk
I think could open cans of worms this is going attract publicity and attention. and I bet within a month there will be a number of complaints & not necessarily just re: penaltys. Whatever we think about dive or no dive a photo on SBT clearly shows a Fulham player with a leg sticking out.
That happens every week somewhere.
Different case
You won’t be that’s a fact negativity around ccfc suits your agenda.
rupert_bearI don’t normally do this. Are you skybluekid?
Haha, your talents are wasted on here m8Remember when the administrators spent all that time looking for the golden share?
View attachment 22137
Well it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric mediaEach case has its own mitigating circumstances. I don’t know the procedures now not been involved in disciplinary issue in footy for years. The procedure used to be there has to be a formal complaint within a time scale 48 hours I think & if FA think there’s a case to answer they deal with it in their disciplinary set up.
I’ll tell you what’s happened in my opinion Fulham manager Marco Silva is attempting to deflect his manager frailties for self protection his super duper promotion favourites got a good old fashioned mauling from a team that just had a bollocking three days before. lost at lowly Blackpool too, Fulham need promotion at the moment I think his job is at risk.
Media for meWell it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric media
No it will be Fulham almost certainly on Silva’s request.Well it’s either silva complaining. Referees assessor or cockney centric media
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?