Golovkin v Brook (2 Viewers)

vow · Sep 10, 2016

Nick said:
Any links?

http://cricfree.tv/watch/live/gennady-golovkin-vs-kell-brook-live-streaming
working well for me so far.

westcountry_skyblue · Sep 10, 2016

Can see this Hall v Haskins fight going the distance it's a bit powder puff.
Want a Brook win but the step up maybe the difference GGG inside 5

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Still torn.
But I think Brooks going to do it

vow · Sep 10, 2016

westcountry_skyblue said:
Can see this Hall v Haskins fight going the distance it's a bit powder puff.

Haha, powder puff is about right, intriguing though.

westcountry_skyblue · Sep 10, 2016

vow said:
Haha, powder puff is about right, intriguing though.

Not a bad fight in the end at least Hall went for it last few rounds

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Kell looking nervous
Not a good sign

Nick · Sep 10, 2016

Is a knockout expected?

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Nick said:
Is a knockout expected?

Experts say round 5 to ggg

vow · Sep 10, 2016

Blimey, that atmosphere is electric!

vow · Sep 10, 2016

Great fight so far.

Nick · Sep 10, 2016

Game over

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Broke his cheek bone in second round. Was over at that point

vow · Sep 10, 2016

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

right decision to throw the towel in, he was taking too many punches unanswered.

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

They haven't even mentioned it yet.
100% lost on injury alone. Corner said one more round but gave him an extra one

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

clint van damme said:
right decision to throw the towel in, he was taking too many punches unanswered.

Wasn't losing on the punches. It's a broken cheek.
That's why it was toweled

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Without that injury he may well have won that
That's a fact

eastwoodsdustman · Sep 10, 2016

Didnt think that Golovkin landed more than 1 punch in the exchange where they threw in the towel. Plenty of wild swings but nothing landed really.

Skyblueweeman · Sep 10, 2016

Pipehitterz said:
Without that injury he may well have won that
That's a fact

If Gary Mabbutts knee hadn't of been in the place it was on 16th May, 1987, we would never have won the cup.

Fact.

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

eastwoodsdustman said:
Didnt think that Golovkin landed more than 1 punch in the exchange where they threw in the towel. Plenty of wild swings but nothing landed really.

Broken cheek.
That's why he lost

Nick · Sep 10, 2016

Was it broken in the fight or did he already have it?

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

Nick said:
Was it broken in the fight or did he already have it?

Just said what I called it
Broke it in second round.
Seen lots and lots of Fights and as soon as it happened I knew that was it

vow · Sep 10, 2016

Broken eye-socket he reckons

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

you're right about the injury, eye socket, that's why nothing was coming back, he couldn't see.Unlucky.
His trainer done the right thing.

bringbackrattles · Sep 10, 2016

Listened on the radio and shocked to hear the towel being thrown in. But Golovkin is awesome and will probably retire unbeaten.

Pipehitterz · Sep 10, 2016

bringbackrattles said:
Listened on the radio and shocked to hear the towel being thrown in. But Golovkin is awesome and will probably retire unbeaten.

You can't fight injured.
I thought he was magnificent,

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

Eddie Hearn said you can't fight on with injuries like that and he's right, that's how people end up getting badly hurt.

eastwoodsdustman · Sep 10, 2016

I know what you're saying Pipes, but why stop it at that moment? Brook wasn't getting hit at that point and looked like he was about to turn him and unload. Corner never gave him a chance to do it. Why leave him in there for the three more rounds and not give him a chance to try and knock him out?

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

t

eastwoodsdustman said:
I know what you're saying Pipes, but why stop it at that moment? Brook wasn't getting hit at that point and looked like he was about to turn him and unload. Corner never gave him a chance to do it. Why leave him in there for the three more rounds and not give him a chance to try and knock him out?

he was seeing 3 or 4 of one of the best pound for pound fighters around, 100 percent correct decision.
Better to be debating throwing it in too early than throwing it in too late.

eastwoodsdustman · Sep 10, 2016

Just read that.Fighting one is enough!Fair play to him for sticking in there. Surprised the corner didnt stop it after 2 if he has fractured his eye socket as they think.

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

it's disappointing because it was a cracking fight.

clint van damme · Sep 10, 2016

wonder if there's a potential light middle weight fight against the winner of Smith or Alvares.

eastwoodsdustman · Sep 10, 2016

Juniors making himself look a prick already. Sure he ducked out of the chance. What a cock.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/boxing/37284691

Hadji10 · Sep 11, 2016

Brook got fucking hammered, anyone spouting any different is believing the sky hype. Golovkin didn't even try and win rounds, he wanted to walk straight through Brook, but fair play Brook was a lot tougher than what i thought.

Pipehitterz · Sep 11, 2016

eastwoodsdustman said:
Juniors making himself look a prick already. Sure he ducked out of the chance. What a cock.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/boxing/37284691

To be fair to him. He'd be the right natural size for ggg.
That would be an amazing fight and I'm disappointed ggg didn't Make it happen before this one.
If anything, Kell has shown the ggg doesn't back up, so apply some pressure.
If there is one thing eubank does do is apply pressure.
Ggg is getting old and by his next fight , like it or not, he will be over the crest of the Hill, could be someone else's time

Golovkin v Brook (2 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

westcountry_skyblue

Guest

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

westcountry_skyblue

Guest

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency