thekidfromstrettoncamp
Well-Known Member
I leave the kids to do that . I'm not being aggressive at all an answer will do.
I leave the kids to do that . I'm not being aggressive at all an answer will do.Just because you like singing his song, don't get all aggressive with me.
Less or more so than Ohare or Gyokores?Hamer is easily replaceable
I can’t fathom how you think it’s easier to replace a guy that scored 17 goals for us last season at short notice?I never said I prefer vik to go all I’m saying is no one will bring a massive fee in and I think vik would be the easiest one to replace at short notice, with a bit of investment m, but we will see what happens in the near future,
Less or more so than Ohare or Gyokores?
Imagine they'll be looking at the likes of Brereton-Diaz & Piroe too.
Disco dancing feet there Perry. Out of the 'big 3' he is the easiest to replace. No denying that.Well that’s neither here nor there. I’m laughing at your claim that Hamer is easily replaceable. What that has to do with COH and Vik I’ve no idea.
I can’t believe people still bite to someone called Greggs
Teams spend years hunting for a 20 goal a year forward, yet they are the easiest to replace? Are you pissed up?I never said I prefer vik to go all I’m saying is no one will bring a massive fee in and I think vik would be the easiest one to replace at short notice, with a bit of investment m, but we will see what happens in the near future,
What does he actually do apart from 2 long passes a game, booking and a fancy inswinging corner?
Not the first time you've been tricked online I'm sure.Ahhh shit have I fallen for a wum? I assumed he was Grendals brother/boyfriend or something.
But took 258 corners. EmbarrassingMost assists for us last season with 10
In all fairness I'd much rather lose Hamer than O'Hare/GyokeresNope, just a bloke that realises a fancy DMC is far easier replaced than a AMC (that we base our whole system around) and an extremely good Stiker. Hardly rocket science.
He’s the best midfielder we’ve had in 10 years , jeez Greggs is playing the forum troll but I think you are genuineI’m actually inclined to agree with Greggs here, I’d much rather see Hamer go. He’s not even the best one out of our starting midfield 2…
Who’s bid for Hamer ?Utterly insane if you’d rather lose Gyokeres than Hamer
What on earth is going on? Have people genuinely forgotten that goals win you football matches? Potential 20 goal a season strikers at Championship level or higher are at an absolute premium. You fall extremely lucky once in 20 years and pick a player up for peanuts that goes on to hit 17 goals and all of a suddenly they’re easy to replace at short notice.He’s the best midfielder we’ve had in 10 years , jeez Greggs is playing the forum troll but I think you are genuine
I never said he was harder to replace than Vik merely stating how good he is .What on earth is going on? Have people genuinely forgotten that goals win you football matches? Potential 20 goal a season strikers at Championship level or higher are at an absolute premium. You fall extremely lucky once in 20 years and pick a player up for peanuts that goes on to hit 17 goals and all of a suddenly they’re easy to replace at short notice.
Don’t get me wrong I love Hamer and agree he’s right up there last 15 years, but harder to replace than Vik? Have a day off
It's not realistic, the higher up we go the more difficult it is to do thisIf Vik is sold for a large amount this season will be about maintaining championship status. We can then look at bringing in 2 or 3 higher quality players next season to strengthen a few positions
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
They’d have nothing to lose in doing so - I doubt we’d have been dictating terms.If there is one I doubt it's overly significant. He was a bit part player for Swansea and looked incredibly raw during his loan spell with us. There wasn't really grounds to put in a massive sell-on clause.
The early season optimism is already disappearing with ground situation so to lose any of the three players will kill it stone dead.I am more concerned about what robins is feeling at this time as he's been let down by the club again after being given no real money after record season ticket sales and the CBS debacle,gutted for him and us.If he is sold the optimism will subside. Unless it's really decent money with big sell on clauses, we should keep hold of him.
Smash milwall 4-0 it'll soon reappearThe early season optimism is already disappearing with ground situation so to lose any of the three players will kill it stone dead.
Don't be ridiculous.If Vic goes that’s as good as our season over before we even start . No chance of top 6 . And no ambition from SISU . MR will walk .
£25 million should be our asking price no less .
They’d have nothing to lose in doing so - I doubt we’d have been dictating terms.
It’s a no lose situation for them though, I’d imagine they have one of at least 20%.No, but I doubt they would've put in a massive sell-on clause just because.
Otherwise by that logic every young player sold by a PL club has a massive sell-on clause attached to their deal and I very much doubt that's the case.
I'd imagine as a point of policy some PL clubs will insert one into the deal but I suspect that it's still relative to the talent they're selling.
Brewster for instance wouldn't have the same sell-on fee inserted into his deal as Gyokeres may/may not have.
It’s a no lose situation for them though, I’d imagine they have one of at least 20%.
He is a cut above the rest of the squad and was able to create something from nothing - without him we never looked like scoring.Both showed their value on Saturday. Gyo saved us a point with a moment of magic, Hamer was atrocious but at least he shot from a corner to keep the fans happy
True, like I said I'd imagine a number of PL clubs put one in to safeguard themselves so I'd imagine it's more than likely one is inserted in there but I'd question how sizeable it actually is.
To be fair though I could be wrong as you do hear of some extreme ones - like Newcastle inserting a 40% sell-on clause of the profit made from the sale of Armstrong or 30% on the sale of Ivan Toney.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?