fatso
Well-Known Member
Ironically, your own graph shows that the last time the global temperature anomaly was at 0.5 was around 1991. It hasn't been down at that level since. Infact there's been a rapid rise since.
Ironically, your own graph shows that the last time the global temperature anomaly was at 0.5 was around 1991. It hasn't been down at that level since. Infact there's been a rapid rise since.The global temperature trend has been heading up long before 1991. 1991 made no appreciable difference to the trend either:
View attachment 25361
So you believe the American government over the space landings, but not over the assassination of JFK ?Well that I do agree with.
So you believe the American government over the space landings, but not over the assassination of JFK ?
How do you decide which BS your choosing to believe in?
And people think I'm a nut job
I'm happy to confirm that JFK WAS assassinated.I must admit I have doubts over the assassination of JFK
Ironically, your own graph shows that the last time the global temperature anomaly was at 0.5 was around 1991. It hasn't been down at that level since. Infact there's been a rapid rise since.
We can see water on distant planets but not a space rover vehicle on the moon?
Yet we can put telescopes into satalights to get past earth's atmosphere, so are you seriously telling me your buying that BS?
You can’t have flat earthers in that list… it’s not a conspiracy theory but a belief system for nutters.The problem with most conspiracies is the sheer number of people needed to keep quiet about them. JFK, Kurt Cobain, Tupac and Biggie, whatever I can accept as you’d only need a handful. Flat Earth, covid, new world order shit, you’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people needed to keep quiet. Never going to happen.
The problem with most conspiracies is the sheer number of people needed to keep quiet about them. JFK, Kurt Cobain, Tupac and Biggie, whatever I can accept as you’d only need a handful. Flat Earth, covid, new world order shit, you’re talking about hundreds of thousands of people needed to keep quiet. Never going to happen.
Can’t remember which director or film critic it was who said it, but my favourite quote about the moon landing conspiracy was that after hiring Stanley Kubrick of all people to direct the faked landing, NASA quickly realised after a few weeks that it would be easier and cheaper to just land on the moon instead.
Agreed, although there are fires breaking out in the south east .This breeze is a fucking godsend
I don't want to imagine a BoriswankJohnson is probably literally fiddling while London burns
I don't want to imagine a Boriswank
He's probably bungee jumping out of a hot air balloon today. Well, it's something to do.Johnson is probably literally fiddling while London burns
I think it would clearly get some interest.Wanna make a conspiracy thread lads or?
Nobody would believe it had been set up, thoughI think it would clearly get some interest.
On a serious note what is he actually doing while there are parts of the country literally on fire?
But the fiesta is much closer, so would actually appear much larger.We can and do and have taken pictures. I’m just assuming because you think NASA are in on it they can’t be trusted as a source. Spotting a ocean at low res is a little easier than spotting something the size of a Ford Fiesta.
Now, I know my armchair is cheap, and at least it's lasted about seven years, but the fake leather has stripped itself off the thing in the heat!
That's the trouble it's all set upsNobody would believe it had been set up, though
That will explain why Mrs Wisdom is late home then!Fires on the a45 by the airport now!
Fires on the a45 by the airport now!
To what purpose?!?Genuinely saw a comment on Instagram that the fires are being started by paid agents
nothing on the telegraph, probably too busy with 'We took a thermometer around Coventry and found the hottest and coldest places', currently the lead story I kid you notFires on the a45 by the airport now!
To what purpose?!?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?