Samo
Well-Known Member
It hasn't worked.
Politicking, and winning hearts and minds.
I posted this on another thread:
It is interesting that Anne Lucas was quite open on Sky TV about CCFC having an option to buy the Higgs share, why would she do that if it were not possible? Pointing it out as she did would piss off Wasps you would have thought, and surely she would want to avoid that. So why say it?
Because it is possible and she wants it happen?
Because it is possible and was part of the plan all along?
Because she doesn't understand that its not possible?
Because she knows its not possible and is giving SISU the finger?
Any other suggestions?
It hasn't worked.
It hasn't worked.
Because of political expediency. Supporters can believe her and blame the club for not taking the option -- an option that never existed.
Lucas and Mutton to CCFC
And most of SBT celebrating their victory in the audience.
tbf, the crowd outside the council house was more
The crowd outside the council house.
Because of political expediency. Supporters can believe her and blame the club for not taking the option -- an option that never existed.
Does this work?
https://twitter.com/SkyBluesTalk/status/520638718072594432
He was asked:
what's stopping the club from buying the other half?
He replied:
Nothing at all. It's a decision for the club.
That was protesting AGAINST Them, my gif was just people cheering Ann Lucas going to work like it was one direction or summat.
Because of political expediency. Supporters can believe her and blame the club for not taking the option -- an option that never existed.
Is it???The option to buy is always there...just have to make the right offer. SISU wanted it gifted IMO
PUSB
Is it???
Is it???
No it isn't but never mind - if Lucas said the world was flat idiots on here would never go on a round the world cruise.
How about replying to the road map question?
No because that's what you do - it's the apples and oranges thing? You get cornered and answer the question with another question which is irrelevant to the discussion.
So I will answer the astute way - Why are UKIP being considered as participants in the live TV debates at the next election?
Is it???
So you are doing your usual then. Proved wrong so trying to change the subject. Well done.
No it isn't but never mind - if Lucas said the world was flat idiots on here would never go on a round the world cruise.
Everything & everybody has a price is one I the cornerstones of a capitalist economy
Ha ha ha ha ha - no old chap that's what you do and a lot of people on here see it.
As I say Teflon skin - its incredible.
Genuine question. Can you explain why it's not there as it appears the 50% is there but apparently will land up with Wasps owners?
No. Your bullshit is easy to pull to bits. And just about everyone knows this.
I thought we were under the impression that wasps have the power to veto any Higgs deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I think only astute knows the answer to that one.
I thought we were under the impression that wasps have the power to veto any Higgs deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
So although you put down people who come up with a view on it, you don't really know :claping hands:
Even Bob Ainsworth now confirms it is 100% and always would be.
He's wrong as we isn't he? And OSB they all are!
You are funny I'll give you that.
So Ainsworth is a c**t to you that knows nothing until you need him
So you know all details of negotiations? Yes we can guess. But considering you have changed the subject to what we were on about as usual............
What IS 100%?
Yes. In answer to the question CCFC ltd is a dormant company in the hands of the liquidator. The liquidator has to make a decision within 30 days and needs to judge if it is in the best interest of the creditors to make a bid. So sisu cannot influence this.
If the lease is in the debt now ACL are the major creditor so that's that. If sisu are the main creditor he has to decide if they can purchase so he will have to see where the power of veto resides .
The power of veto resides with wasps if the transfer has gone through or the council if not. He will judge the likelihood of the veto being exercised.
Given the head of Higgs had stated that wasps were the preferred bidder I think he may draw an obvious conclusion.
That enough for you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?