J
Jack Griffin
Guest
It simply sucks money out of the charity.
Personally i don't think SISU give a shit about this court case and i'm not surprised it was thrown out. It's the JR they want.
Personally i don't think SISU give a shit about this court case and i'm not surprised it was thrown out. It's the JR they want.
Just a bit of light sparring, this one!
Counter claims are how you defend yourself.
It simply sucks money out of the charity.
The case & counter claim is about establishing whether the evil hedge fund did indeed renege or whether the charity did - try and retain some balance eh?
The counter claim does appear excessive though there may be some legal reason behind it.
Personally i don't think SISU give a shit about this court case and i'm not surprised it was thrown out. It's the JR they want.
Personally i don't think SISU give a shit about this court case and i'm not surprised it was thrown out. It's the JR they want.
If the Charity win the case won't they get costs back?
Just a bit of light sparring, this one!
Will SISU actually pay up anyway ?If the Charity win the case won't they get costs back?
If that's the case why have they put so much time and effort into it? An expensive, pointless exercise
Even if they do get costs, I doubt they will get as much as spent and given the track record SISU have of settling their debts I doubt the charity will ever get paid.
The JR is against CCC not Higgs.
This case may have lifted some information from Higgs to sisu (and into the public domain) that may help sisu in the JR.
If that is true - then I think sisu are happy to pay the £29k plus tip.
the Judge who granted them the JR has provided the route to that?
The JR is against CCC not Higgs.
This case may have lifted some information from Higgs to sisu (and into the public domain) that may help sisu in the JR.
If that is true - then I think sisu are happy to pay the £29k plus tip.
I think people are forgetting that it was Higgs that took this to court in the first place not SISU so it's not like its part of some grand master plan to get information.
What Information .
the Judge who granted them the JR has provided the route to that?
You don't think sisu would know Higgs had an obligation to bring it to court?
They also have to pay their own legal team.
You don't think sisu would know Higgs had an obligation to bring it to court?
So why such a big counter claim? was it not to try and scare Higgs and therefore not make it to court?
There is nothing in the JR that would mean Higgs would have to reveal any communication between them and the council. I don't think the council are legally obliged to share but then again the documents referred to may be revealed under FOI.
To me SISU were always and still are the bad guys. Turning up with an army of lawyers with a ridiculously high counter claim against a paltry 29000 claim from a charity. Whatever their supposed real motives are, they are not getting my support. Fees for advice from Tim Fisher!!? I hope they lose and have to pay up here and that the JR gets thrown out as well. These people are not interested in soccer and CCFC is just a pawn in their bigger game. No, I am not an ACL or CCC lover, but I have a thing against bullying, whether in court, in business or on the streets.
I don't think so - if Higgs claim is turned down (that is still to be decided!) then sisu would of course try to get as much cost covered as possible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?