They could but it isn’t a secret thing to keep it hush. Boddy’s not gonna sit there saying “can’t tell you who owns us”
I’m convinced he wants to buy us - he’ll be thinking “WTF is going on” like usSo why is he doing all this to find out and "flush them out"?
Hoffman's relationship with Ashley should raise a few eyebrows - bet there are more than a few PL clubs looking at this development with a lot of interest.
Hoffman was the one who pushed through the Saudi Newcastle deal against the wishes of many PL clubs (informed them after deal was done and without consultation) and it cost him that job.
12 months later he's going to be on the board of a new Ashley business.
I’m convinced he wants to buy us - he’ll be thinking “WTF is going on” like us
As he championed Hoffmans bid and is mates with Ashley, I'll bet that c**t 'superfan' Hairy Keys has some part in this.
As he championed Hoffmans bid and is mates with Ashley, I'll bet that c**t 'superfan' Hairy Keys has some part in this.
More than likely - Hoffman on the CBS arena board is a bit if telltale sign, it’s almost like the pieces are being put in placePretty sure there's much more going on than we know about.
Well his programme notes seem a bit different to head office?They could but it isn’t a secret thing to keep it hush. Boddy’s not gonna sit there saying “can’t tell you who owns us”
Who would you endorse then ?Posted up a tweet from the prick earlier endorsing Ashley
Who would you endorse then ?
But one a much shorter deal of a few months meaning that we'd have nowhere to play. Which puts the club at a massive disadvantage as it's highly likely the rental costs would be hiked massively and/or the revenues available from matchdays cut due to time pressures.They won’t evict ffs! sisu have been offered mirrored terms to play at the CBS and as yet chose not to sign. Who’s fault is that.
They have offered mirrored terms ffs! And if there are new agreements we the fans will pay as ticket prices will go up.But one a much shorter deal of a few months meaning that we'd have nowhere to play. Which puts the club at a massive disadvantage as it's highly likely the rental costs would be hiked massively and/or the revenues available from matchdays cut due to time pressures.
I find it incredible that if the intention to continue under current terms was there why was it not included in writing as part of the sale to Frasers?
It does seem that terms same as those they're on were offered pre-sale and not signed. But right now mirrored terms are NOT on the table. They've been withdrawn for a much shorter term.They have offered mirrored terms ffs! And if there are new agreements we the fans will pay as ticket prices will go up.
there's definitely an upside to having someone who genuinely cares about the club in a position of power but at the same time there's a lot of people on here who live and breathe the club who I'd want nowhere near the decision making process.Not necessarily sticking up for Hoffman, but at least he attends games and has an obvious affection for the club. I have seen him at away games like Chesterfield, when we were down to our core support attending. He may be disliked for some of his connections/dealings, but at least he follows the team (add in Joe Elliot to that)
there's definitely an upside to having someone who genuinely cares about the club in a position of power but at the same time there's a lot of people on here who live and breathe the club who I'd want nowhere near the decision making process.
It does seem that terms same as those they're on were offered pre-sale and not signed. But right now mirrored terms are NOT on the table. They've been withdrawn for a much shorter term.It does seem that terms same as those they're on were offered pre-sale and not signed. But right now mirrored terms are NOT on the table. They've been withdrawn for a much shorter term.
The entire thing has got me thinking about why has everyone in this mess has done what they have.
My guess is that by signing the mirrored terms pre-sale SISU/King would have effectively scuppered their own bid for the stadium. So did Fraser's only offer the terms because they expected them to be turned down and thus allow them to state they offered the same terms but they were refused?
Then it's when did Fraser's remove those mirrored terms for the six month deal? Was it as soon as the deal went through? Was it when CCFC said they wanted changes in a new agreement?
Seems like crap decisions all round. MA doesn't care what people think of him but even so serving an eviction notice on a local football club where you want to base the HQ of one of your businesses seems like an incredibly stupid thing to do. It may well help him get the club cheaper but mainly because he's driven the price down and made the club and fans suffer in the process. He'd have to invest the money he saves back in just to bring us back up to the same level of competitiveness we are now. So swings and roundabouts just so he can feel like he's got one over someone. Only he's not factoring in how stubborn Seppala can be.
Not sure ccfc is well served by Hoffman but I’m sure opinions differ on thatMore than likely - Hoffman on the CBS arena board is a bit if telltale sign, it’s almost like the pieces are being put in place
Really? I’m astonished at how people doubt him. If I was a money man and wanted CCFC, he would be first on the list to run the club.Not sure ccfc is well served by Hoffman but I’m sure opinions differ on that
Really?? What do you base that on?Really? I’m astonished at how people doubt him. If I was a money man and wanted CCFC, he would be first on the list to run the club.
Really? I’m astonished at how people doubt him. If I was a money man and wanted CCFC, he would be first on the list to run the club.
He made some unfortunate pairings and upset a number of people who are equally huge fans of the club or as successfulReally? I’m astonished at how people doubt him. If I was a money man and wanted CCFC, he would be first on the list to run the club.
He fronts or is spokesman for a consortium made up of local businessmen trying for a few years to buy the club with these types opinions may differ but I’d assume he talks for the majority.
at the same time there's a lot of people on here who live and breathe the club who I'd want nowhere near the decision making process.
C'mon Dave...name names!
But doesn't a lease give exclusive rights? So in my understanding the agreement with Wasps must have been a licence.It does seem that terms same as those they're on were offered pre-sale and not signed. But right now mirrored terms are NOT on the table. They've been withdrawn for a much shorter term.
You could argue they have a longer term
The "old" agreement and "new" one are licences - so FG could have exercised the eviction terms any time aftet they took over
If they wanted certainty of tenure for CCFC why did they not offer a full lease?
I think that is what I have said ?But doesn't a lease give exclusive rights? So in my understanding the agreement with Wasps must have been a licence.
Lease or Licence - what's the difference? | BLB Solicitors
Commercial lease or licence - what's the difference? And for landlords, beware of unintentionally creating a lease. Find out more >>www.blbsolicitors.co.uk
Why not if people come along boasting few bob which might help check them out & once seen either or both aren’t for real dump them. As said there’s a consortium might not have been Hoffman who was initially approached.Poker Players and made up energy drink men?
I agree you did, but why are we saying we should have been offered a lease for security of tenure?I think that is what I have said ?
I agree you did, but why are we saying we should have been offered a lease for security of tenure?
Wouldn't that possibly massively disadvantage HofF?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?