Judge Louisa Ciecióra said it was in Orton's favour that her crime was 'not sophisticated' and that she had no previous convictions.
And only £200 compensation to the victim too? What's that, "just give him his money back?"Blackmailed somebody with a rape claim, suspended sentence only.
Mother who blackmailed man out of £200 is spared jail
Chelsea Orton, 22, admitted to blackmailing the man, who cannot be named, out of £200 between July and August 2019 by threatening to accuse him of rape at Warwick Crown Court.www.dailymail.co.uk
How the fuck is her being a thick mess in her favour? Get her locked up.
All this will do is cause issues with people who are genuinely raped reporting it and other people who haven't not seeing the punishment for false claims.
And only £200 compensation to the victim too? What's that, "just give him his money back?"
Has to serve time at the very least.If it can be proven it's a completely made up claim as in this case they should serve the same time a rapist would.
Just maliciously trying to ruin someone's life.
Has to serve time at the very least.
Short sentences do not workBlackmailed somebody with a rape claim, suspended sentence only.
Mother who blackmailed man out of £200 is spared jail
Chelsea Orton, 22, admitted to blackmailing the man, who cannot be named, out of £200 between July and August 2019 by threatening to accuse him of rape at Warwick Crown Court.www.dailymail.co.uk
How the fuck is her being a thick mess in her favour? Get her locked up.
All this will do is cause issues with people who are genuinely raped reporting it and other people who haven't not seeing the punishment for false claims.
Short sentences do not work
Sorry I know but it would only have been a short one and they just don’t workThere was no sentence.
All this will do is cause issues with people who are genuinely raped reporting it and other people who haven't not seeing the punishment for false claims.
Yeah they do. I understood that one perfectly. Legible and concise.Short sentences do not work
It's obviously a horrendous thing to do, but surely it's not as bad as actually raping someone.If it can be proven it's a completely made up claim as in this case they should serve the same time a rapist would.
Just maliciously trying to ruin someone's life.
No but it’s trying to get that punishment for doing that onto someone out of malicious intent.It's obviously a horrendous thing to do, but surely it's not as bad as actually raping someone.
No but it’s trying to get that punishment for doing that onto someone out of malicious intent.
Trying to get someone sent down as a rapist for 10 years or whatever maliciously should result in actual consequence.
Maybe then rape claims will be looked into properly too.
Of course not. There are obviously a lot of cases where one side sees is different to another. If it’s cut and dry though then they should face the same punishment they were trying to force the other into.Needs a high bar though. Rape is famously hard to prove in court so it can’t just be a zero sum game where every accusation someone goes to prison.
It's obviously a horrendous thing to do, but surely it's not as bad as actually raping someone.
I know that seems to be important but honestly it just doesn’t work as has been shown a lotYou can’t really compare. However Im guessing being falsely accused of rape or being a pedophile is probably the worst thing you can ever be accused of, especially as in a lot of situations doubt might remain even if you get acquitted.
I remember hearing about this story and there’s others
My mum and brother both ended their lives after he was falsely accused of rape
Camellia Cheshire was driven to the brink of suicide herself as she organised funerals for mother Karin and her brother Jay, 17www.mirror.co.uk
Also it leads to genuine rape cases being doubted, which will dissuade rape victims from going to the police and potentially guilty rapists getting away with it.
If it’s 100% intentional false accusation a jail sentence is the only answer
It’s a really tricky topic, and one I have a little personal experience of but can’t discuss in public.
I completely get that the system has been and likely still is shit at protecting victims. But there seem to be a lot of people who see it as an easy weapon or get convinced something has happened when it hasn’t by well intentioned people.
Both are absolutely devastating and both ruin lives, I really don’t know what the answer is short of permanent body cams for all women
Well obviously you can compare them - that’s why we have a criminal justice system. Generally speaking it’s hard to see how falsely accusing someone of a heinous crime is going to be as bad as actually committing the crime itself. Of course, if someone causes damages to someone with a false claim then they should compensate the victim - although that strikes me as more of a civil case than a criminal one…not sure why this one was heard in Crown Court.You can’t really compare. However Im guessing being falsely accused of rape or being a pedophile is probably the worst thing you can ever be accused of, especially as in a lot of situations doubt might remain even if you get acquitted.
I remember hearing about this story and there’s others
My mum and brother both ended their lives after he was falsely accused of rape
Camellia Cheshire was driven to the brink of suicide herself as she organised funerals for mother Karin and her brother Jay, 17www.mirror.co.uk
Also it leads to genuine rape cases being doubted, which will dissuade rape victims from going to the police and potentially guilty rapists getting away with it.
If it’s 100% intentional false accusation a jail sentence is the only answer
But false allegations are 2-6% of all reported crimes which means 94 - 98% are genuine.
Here’s the truth about false accusations of sexual violence
Why didn’t these women speak up sooner? This was asked time and time again during the recent public furore around sexual harassment, violence and abuse. Underlying the question is a persistent uncertainty about the credibility of victims – a concern with identifying what is true and what is false.www.open.ac.uk
Well obviously you can compare them - that’s why we have a criminal justice system. Generally speaking it’s hard to see how falsely accusing someone of a heinous crime is going to be as bad as actually committing the crime itself. Of course, if someone causes damages to someone with a false claim then they should compensate the victim - although that strikes me as more of a civil case than a criminal one…not sure why this one was heard in Crown Court.
Ultimately if people are really concerned about rape cases going unprosecuted (and they should be!) then I think there are much bigger problems than false accusations that need highlighting.
I was talking about the original case.Driving someone to suicide is a civil case? Really?
I know that seems to be important but honestly it just doesn’t work as has been shown a lot
Ultimately if people are really concerned about rape cases going unprosecuted (and they should be!) then I think there are much bigger problems than false accusations that need highlighting.
All the evidence I’ve seen is that most crime is reactive and involves little thought. Criminals do not think if I do this I’m going to prison they just do itAgreed from the tangible results/outcomes of prison and I personally see little value in some criminals being locked up. What we probably don’t know though is how stronger sentences for certain crimes (not all) might deter people from doing them
I suppose in my simple mind, is someone more or less likely to risk doing what that woman did knowing she got £200 fine compared to if she’d been sent down, for say, a year or two.
Appreciate I’m probably looking more at deterrent side for certain crimes though, not the ‘benefits’ or otherwise of prison
In this specific case I don't believe the person was capable of making that considerationAgreed from the tangible results/outcomes of prison and I personally see little value in some criminals being locked up. What we probably don’t know though is how stronger sentences for certain crimes (not all) might deter people from doing them
I suppose in my simple mind, is someone more or less likely to risk doing what that woman did knowing she got £200 fine compared to if she’d been sent down, for say, a year or two.
Appreciate I’m probably looking more at deterrent side for certain crimes though, not the ‘benefits’ or otherwise of prison
I guess, but I don’t think it’s a typical story. Grim as this tale is, it’s the kind of story that usually just ends up as fodder for people who are trying to ‘both sides’ a system that is brutally unfair to women, and who are conspicuously quiet about the countless real victims who get routinely let down by the justice system.Yeah, agree with this. Was just saying it’s another thing that adds to ‘doubts’
Doesn't work in what sense? Who cares if it works, it's a punishment.I know that seems to be important but honestly it just doesn’t work as has been shown a lot
Makes criminals, doesn’t rehabilitate and is expensiveDoesn't work in what sense? Who cares if it works, it's a punishment.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?