Proper defender for this levelOstigard looks very decent.
I'd rather keep Kelly than sheaf
Dabo is fine, but I think we are watching someone who has been playing himself back from injury several times. He needs a proper rest in the summer, His energy levels suggest he is still self managing. Another factor may be that his main asset is going forward, and this season he is being pushed back more often, due to the better quality team/opponent he is facing. Thus reduces his effectiveness at times.
He is definitely sloppy and makes many poor attempts at passes per game. I like him, but but not all sure he is up to the level of a very good Championship midfielder.That’s nostalgia talking. Kelly has shown in recent games he’s not a Championship player. His use of the ball is awful.
The gulf between league one and championship has surprised me, the league has evolved so much since we last played in it. I thought promotion momentum would help us but you can’t make up the quality with effort alone.I would let Kelly go end of season tbh
Keep sheaf hamer o hare walker godden Dabo Mcallum(loan ext) and then try replace others with better players. Get us to Luton levels next season
The gulf between league one and championship has surprised me, the league has evolved so much since we last played in it. I thought promotion momentum would help us but you can’t make up the quality with effort alone.
He hasn't really had the impact on results you'd hope for, from a marquee signing.Of all the players to scapegoat after a poor team performance last night Matty James is an odd one. I'm assuming this is more to prove a point than an actual observation.
Decent player, but I think Sheaf and Kelly are too, and we really only 1-2 of them to start per game. It was a strange signing, as we had Sheaf, recalled Eccles (who were both fit) and Kelly was due back in February. He should used the money to loan one attacking midfielder in from the Premier League, and not bothered with James, and the Swede who offers less than Biamou.
He hasn't really had the impact on results you'd hope for, from a marquee signing.
But ultimately for his cost, for better or worse he'd be expected to deliver more of an uptick than other players. And that's where the issue is, really, we're paying a (relative) lot for somebody who hasn't had the effect on results we need(ed), while other areas of the team are still neglected. Now, some bits are maybe bad luck (could we have predicted McCallum's form would fall away once Giles went back?) but we've been crying out for boosts in other areas of the pitch (goalkeeper, is the hot topic around here atm) and defensive central midfield wasn't the first area on most people's lips where we needed strengthening.I'm not sure I'd call him a marquee signing, at least not the kind of signing to single handedly improve results. He's been decent yet much of the team around him have not been performing.
But ultimately for his cost, for better or worse he'd be expected to deliver more of an uptick than other players. And that's where the issue is, really, we're paying a (relative) lot for somebody who hasn't had the effect on results we need(ed), while other areas of the team are still neglected. Now, some bits are maybe bad luck (could we have predicted McCallum's form would fall away once Giles went back?) but we've been crying out for boosts in other areas of the pitch (goalkeeper, is the hot topic around here atm) and defensive central midfield wasn't the first area on most people's lips where we needed strengthening.
And strengthening there hasn't seen results, or even performances, bounce, so it's looking a bit of a bum deal. That's not James's fault as such, but it is the fault of signing James.
But ultimately for his cost, for better or worse he'd be expected to deliver more of an uptick than other players. And that's where the issue is, really, we're paying a (relative) lot for somebody who hasn't had the effect on results we need(ed), while other areas of the team are still neglected. Now, some bits are maybe bad luck (could we have predicted McCallum's form would fall away once Giles went back?) but we've been crying out for boosts in other areas of the pitch (goalkeeper, is the hot topic around here atm) and defensive central midfield wasn't the first area on most people's lips where we needed strengthening.
And strengthening there hasn't seen results, or even performances, bounce, so it's looking a bit of a bum deal. That's not James's fault as such, but it is the fault of signing James.
No Ostigard ?
Sheaf's first contribution led to the commentator saying what a very strange pass as he instantly gave the ball to Luton.
Lowest budget in the league but we can afford £750k on a non starter, I don't think so. Just hope it isn't triggered already, I would have him on a free due to potential that's it and even with that we have had a season to know he isn't up to it.
We havent the lowest budget in terms of transfer fees and clearly are not lower than Wycombe anyway and £750k isn’t even upfront its very little expenditure
I am going by Mark Robbins, he said we have the lowest including Wycombe. A 750k transfer free is massive for us to date, unless we have a windfall that type of fee has to be on a starter surely?
James and Györkeres are Mowbray level January signings. There, I said it.
Andy Rose
Peter Ramage
Joe Cole
Stephen Hunt
Darius Henderson
Jack Stephens
Baily Cargill
Do you want some poppadoms with that spicy take?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?