Either way - they don't want to buy it. So they don't value it that highly, no matter how much bluster there is.
If ACL is going to be the successful enterprise that it's being talked up as... why would they now want to buy it?
I think you're confusing councils with capitalist.
So are they just 50% capitalists?
Ain't they reinvesting everything back into the Ricoh, while not taking any dividends? That sounds like 0% capitalist to me.
Where have I stated what the share is worth?
All I have ever said it is worth what the Higgs are prepared to sell it for alongside what someone is prepared to pay....
Where have I ever claimed to know what its worth?
All I have ever done is quote what Higgs think its worth.
Unlike you I dont claim to know things such as these.
However one thing I know for certain is this. Just like all of us on this forum, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT ACL IS WORTH.
The fact that you make up this type of nonsense is why no one takes you seriously.
I think you're confusing councils with capitalist.
It is confusing I know. After all, the loan to ACL was justified by the fact it would "rerurn a profit over time".
I don't I think its worth fuck all you idiot - that's the point if the thread. Its worth £6.5 million and its a charity. Surely the council have a duty - its only buying at its value. Do you think it isn't worth it Tony?
So have you not said CCFC should pay £6.5 million for the Higgs share? Are you sure?
That's a lot of money to keep the dust at bay
So if sisu and the council claim the share is worthless they may be correct?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?