Colonel Mustard
New Member
No, because you resorted to emotion and irrationalism when you reached the end of your debating road. Textbook.
Just continuing to prove my point. Take a cold shower.
Right, this is the "textbook reaction" because you think I think I'm wrong?
Actually, it's because I can't be bothered to argue anymore with someone who the initial comment was not aimed at anyway but was so narcissistic enough to join in and dismiss my realistic comment as wrong (what a surprise) and then what really does my head in is this "textbook reaction" as if you're some all knowing psychology professor and this is exactly what you expected. And do you know the complete irony of it, your reply was exactly what I was expecting.
No, because you resorted to emotion and irrationalism when you reached the end of your debating road. Textbook.
Just continuing to prove my point. Take a cold shower.
Yes, if you're referring to kg82. I engaged in discussion with him, answered all his points, and he worked himself into a lather when he was up against a wall. Textbook.
I'm confused as to how predicting the future is now regarded as being a realist? We have as much chance of staying up as going down - that's being a realist.
I honestly think you just like confrontation.
My replies may come across as heated but they're not, it's just a way of writing.
It's not as if I'm sat at my computer getting red-faced and pulling my hair out over some keyboard warrior!
And which textbook would that be? Freud's famous text on the behaviour of football forum members?
I like discussion. I like jumping in and starting questions, looking at facts and statistics, engaging with fellow posters. I don't dislike anybody here; the heat tends to come in my direction, but I feel like I back up my arguments.
The tone of writing on a message board is a reflection of the author.
So you've described me as a "keyboard warrior", "professor of psychology", "narcissistic", "know-it-all" among others. And you say you're not getting red-faced? Really?
Cool off.
No. Are you trying to infer you know what I'm like again?
Your questions are the same questions. It was nothing more than going in circles. You may like discussion and questions, as do I, but try and keep it fresh. Don't just argue my point with what was essentially just saying the opposite - "It's not realistic"... "Well, that WAS realistic". THAT'S why I gave up with the supposed debate.
It seemed to work. That was a much cooler post.
They weren't the same questions. It was a discussion about the meaning of the term realistic. You stated that you believed fans could have different ideas of what constitutes realism, whereas I said it was measurable. Then you pulled up your stumps and went home. Walk away, say "different opinions, we'll leave it at that" or whatever...but cries of "Christ", "sick and tired", "MEEEE", various personal attacks, and playing the victim don't really say "this is an individual who keeps his cool"; it was really that defensiveness that was so textbook.
Yeah, I was sick and tired oof going over the same thing. I'd said my piece, you said your piece, you said it again. It wasn't defensive, it was exasperation, there's a difference.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?