Then we need to go back to them and say the door may be open but indemnity is a brick wall preventing access to the door.Pretty sure wasps and mr Eastwood would say that their door is open
Then we need to go back to them and say the door may be open but indemnity is a brick wall preventing access to the door.
Yeah, Simon Gilbert just 'happened' to find out about it as negotiations were falling down. No chance.Call me cynical but I refuse to believe that the EU case was a "surprise" that they didn't know about I don't buy it at all.
that's the problem with the half-arsed journalism going on atm.Pretty sure wasps and mr Eastwood would say that their door is open
Pretty sure the door is open. Which beggars the question doesn’t it??? Why not say this on the record to midlands today or cwr? Rather than the half baked the need to stop the legal action. So so frustrating that local media aren’t doing the bare minimum of what we askedthat's the problem with the half-arsed journalism going on atm.
Where's the follow-up questions that get the truth and don't settle for NDA excuses?
Find it hard to believe a simple "Yes or No" to "is there an indemnity" and "is it the only block to CCFC returning to the Ricoh" is covered by NDAs.
Ofc the door is open but you can't come in unless....
Also let's get it in the open is this indemnity for Wasps or as suggested for related 3rd parties as well? Or is that again NDA time?
Completely unrealistic for the club to be indemnifying 3rd parties like CCC.
All sides saying "trust us, believe us, support us but sorry we can't actually tell you why you should because we've conspired to keep things from you with the use of NDAs".
Seems to be an allround consensus from these interested parties that fans are stupid, mindless sheep. here are some crayons, go and sit quietly in the corner.
He's a buffoon isn't heCj is insisting any statement includes demanding that Sisu also sign an agreement in favour of third parties
then he's not safe to be out on his own.Cj is insisting any statement includes demanding that Sisu also sign an agreement in favour of third parties
then he's not safe to be out on his own.
How can any CCFC fan say we should sign an agreement that would literally bankrupt the club if the EU decision went against CCC? And why should the club indemnify anyone that has broken the law (again if EU decides that)?
cov utd ladies too?
Wow that’s new. Is that something wasps have said?Cj is insisting any statement includes demanding that Sisu also sign an agreement in favour of third parties
They won’t respond. Not in that way at least and I’m pretty sure wasps haven’t replied to the questions the trust posed to them and published in response to our statement. Or have they?Because they know that SISU / CCFC won't agree to it so they can shout at them rather than say anything about Wasps.
Wow that’s new. Is that something wasps have said?
Well he's just an idiot. he's highlighted a part where SISU offered 5.5m just for the Higgs Shares. Didn't Wasps end up paying them 2.77m for their ACL shares?This really is the trust view
why the hell would I care what Sphinx or Coventry Utd did at the weekend? I'm a City fan.As we speak Mr Kalns is selling the Sky Blue Trust message
why the hell would I care what Sphinx or Coventry Utd did at the weekend? I'm a City fan.
Also don't care what Birmingham City, Stratford Town, Blyth Spartans or Inter Milan did.
If the word "Coventry" appears in the title do I have to support it? means i would have to back the telegraph, the council, all manner of sports teams I've no association with and ultimately if some have their way "Coventry" Wasps.
SISU withdrew that offer saying that the business was worthless and offered something like £1M (might have been slightly more) because they recognised that Higgs is a charity. I think it was Laura Deering who confirmed this in court in the Higgs/SISU court case (not to be confused with the JR’s).Well he's just an idiot. he's highlighted a part where SISU offered 5.5m just for the Higgs Shares. Didn't Wasps end up paying them 2.77m for their ACL shares?
Then paid Council 2.77m for their shares. plus took on the loan.
Again in the context of what the deal was for.SISU withdrew that offer saying that the business was worthless and offered something like £1M (might have been slightly more) because they recognised that Higgs is a charity. I think it was Laura Deering who confirmed this in court in the Higgs/SISU court case (not to be confused with the JR’s).
Shame I can't reply, for some reason he's blocked me. Me! WTF dude etc???As we speak Mr Kalns is selling the Sky Blue Trust message
Is that us the Sisu troll farm?
Ah ok. I really don’t care about cov united or Sphinx sorry
Rupert Lowe talked about years which makes the indemnity a little more daftThe matter of the European Commission disappears if the EC decide there is no case to answer. It gets messy if they rule that they rules have been broken.
If I've understood the process correctly, then the EC could make a ruling that CCC needs to recoup "£X" million from Wasps. I'm sure they'd be some sort of appeal and given that the EC will move at a snails pace ......I might be dead by the time this is resolved [ I'm only 21 lol].
Prior to 31st January our MEPs were pretty good at responding on what the process, but now I've no idea how we get to ask a question.
Does anyone else know anything about the timelines for a ruling?
Madrid case took 3 years investigation then another 3 years for the appeal. Seems pretty standard for European courts. System different to ours. Not all done in one sitting but several as judges hearing multiple cases at same time.The matter of the European Commission disappears if the EC decide there is no case to answer. It gets messy if they rule that they rules have been broken.
If I've understood the process correctly, then the EC could make a ruling that CCC needs to recoup "£X" million from Wasps. I'm sure they'd be some sort of appeal and given that the EC will move at a snails pace ......I might be dead by the time this is resolved [ I'm only 21 lol].
Prior to 31st January our MEPs were pretty good at responding on what the process, but now I've no idea how we get to ask a question.
Does anyone else know anything about the timelines for a ruling?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?