Never claimed I did. It's just a bit of (slightly morbid) fun.So you're keeping Kitching in, dropping Eccles and our natural width.
Who knows? (Not you)
To be fair there isn’t any natural bloody widthSo you're keeping Kitching in, dropping Eccles and our natural width.
Who knows? (Not you)
Dovin
Thomas Binks
MvE Lats Dasilva
Rudoni Sheaf
Saka BTA Wright
sort of 343 I guess.
On current availability
Dovin
Lati Thomas Kitching Dasilva
MVE Sheaf Eccles Wright
Simms BTA
44 fooking 2, play as direct as possible
Could also swap some players around to get Rudoni or EMC in.
Injured. But yea him in for Lati when fit.Don’t think Wright has the discipline to play a winger in a 442, EMC would probably do better on the left. Why not Saka on the right?
Injured. But yea him in for Lati when fit.
Not a perfect fit for Wright no but on current evidence I’d still probably play him there ahead of EMC.
SBG. Love the passion. But "plan" found wanting at "dynamic movement".(this is purely a distraction post - I am not saying we should do this or that Robins should/ will go)
...Fade in...
Another disappointing result.
You are Mark Robins.
You now feel that you have one more roll of the die...
What crazy/outlandish formation/ tactic do you come up with?
I'll start:
3-5-2 formation with inverted wing-backs. Two CMs and a CAM, Two strikers with one playing Target Man, the other Shadow Sticker/ Second Striker
+++++++++++++ Dovin ++++++++++++
++++++Thomas Kitchin Binks++++++
Da Silva +++ Torp + Sheaf +++ MVE
+++++++++++Rudoni++++++++++++
+++++ Simms + BTA/Bassette +++++
The team focuses on controlling the middle of the pitch while still maintaining width through dynamic movement. The three center-backs provide defensive solidity, while the wing-backs, instead of staying wide, tuck inside to overload the midfield. This creates an advantage in central areas, allowing the team to dominate possession and build up attacks through short passes.
The inverted wing-backs are key to this system. By drifting into central midfield during attacks, they give the team more passing options and help the midfielders link up with the strikers. When the wing-backs move inward, they also leave space on the flanks for the center-backs to advance, or for the strikers to drift wide, which makes the team more unpredictable. Defensively, the inverted wing-backs can either shift back to wide positions or stay central to compress the midfield and stop counter-attacks.
Up front, the two strikers play complementary roles. Simms holds up the ball and acts as the focal point for crosses and long balls, while BTA/ Bassette make runs behind the defense, feeding off through balls and capitalising on space created by Simms.
Who knows
EMC does for sure.To be fair there isn’t any natural bloody width
the wingers just drift inside for no real logical reason
Exactly that. Take Saturday for example, EMC was inside most of the game - and like every other week this season leaves Milan 2/3 on 1. If we had any width, we would be better at playing against the pressTo be fair there isn’t any natural bloody width
the wingers just drift inside for no real logical reason
Tactically we’re all over the place at the momentExactly that. Take Saturday for example, EMC was inside most of the game - and like every other week this season leaves Milan 2/3 on 1. If we had any width, we would be better at playing against the press
Would love a change and great to see ideas on here.(this is purely a distraction post - I am not saying we should do this or that Robins should/ will go)
...Fade in...
Another disappointing result.
You are Mark Robins.
You now feel that you have one more roll of the die...
What crazy/outlandish formation/ tactic do you come up with?
I'll start:
3-5-2 formation with inverted wing-backs. Two CMs and a CAM, Two strikers with one playing Target Man, the other Shadow Sticker/ Second Striker
+++++++++++++ Dovin ++++++++++++
++++++Thomas Kitchin Binks++++++
Da Silva +++ Torp + Sheaf +++ MVE
+++++++++++Rudoni++++++++++++
+++++ Simms + BTA/Bassette +++++
The team focuses on controlling the middle of the pitch while still maintaining width through dynamic movement. The three center-backs provide defensive solidity, while the wing-backs, instead of staying wide, tuck inside to overload the midfield. This creates an advantage in central areas, allowing the team to dominate possession and build up attacks through short passes.
The inverted wing-backs are key to this system. By drifting into central midfield during attacks, they give the team more passing options and help the midfielders link up with the strikers. When the wing-backs move inward, they also leave space on the flanks for the center-backs to advance, or for the strikers to drift wide, which makes the team more unpredictable. Defensively, the inverted wing-backs can either shift back to wide positions or stay central to compress the midfield and stop counter-attacks.
Up front, the two strikers play complementary roles. Simms holds up the ball and acts as the focal point for crosses and long balls, while BTA/ Bassette make runs behind the defense, feeding off through balls and capitalising on space created by Simms.
Who knows
Id give Wright a go at CF . Looks disinterested where he is at present. Don't like rewarding someone who's not giving but needs must
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?