?The same was true for McFadzean and look at the difference he made to our team.
because those are not the tactics FL playsWhy not?
Lampard doesn’t play a back 5. And I don’t see him ever using one with us.Why not?
Well that is what the websites that list these things say he is onHe won't be on that at all. I'd advise you don't take what you read on Google as fact.
because those are not the tactics FL plays
Is he incapable of trying something different? I would have thought he'd be up for playing whatever system best fit the squad.Lampards whole managerial career he hasnt played a back 5
Well history shows he is very unlikely to play a back 5 so why buy/loan someone who can only play in a 5?Is he incapable of trying something different? I would have thought he'd be up for playing whatever system best fit the squad.
He played a 5-2-3 at Everton at times. Not saying he will here as I don’t think he will but has played a back five.Lampards whole managerial career he hasnt played a back 5
Well he wasn't involved in the recruitment, so I would hope he has enough tactical flexibility in him to play whatever system we need to garner results. We kind of need that at the minute.Well history shows he is very unlikely to play a back 5 so why buy/loan someone who can only play in a 5?
Also we recruited for a 4 so if he is going to play what suits the squad best then once again it is a back 4.
Well that is what the websites that list these things say he is on
Most of those sites are just clickbate or guess work. No idea what he’s on but it is a lot for a player who doesn’t play many games , in a team which don’t pay as high wages as other teamsWell that is what the websites that list these things say he is on
a few times against elite teamsHe played a 5-2-3 at Everton at times. Not saying he will here as I don’t think he will but has played a back five.
it's no where near the same, apart from 2 games that had Rudoni at LWB we defended with a 5 and played full backs as wingbacks so there was no back 4Also football has moved on from set roles, a lot more happens in transition. Since in his possession the tactic was a 3-2-5/3-4-3 you could argue it was as much as a back three as the Robins 3-5-2 which had a back four in defence
Those are the games I was referring to as the last robins tactic. Didn’t make that clear but you see my pointit's no where near the same, apart from 2 games that had Rudoni at LWB we defended with a 5 and played full backs as wingbacks so there was no back 4
2 games? by the Derby game Rudi was playing as a normal lb in defence hence him being in a left position when he played that awful back passThose are the games I was referring to as the last robins tactic. Didn’t make that clear but you see my point
My point being is that formations aren’t static, Binks isn’t the model Leftback but in a tactic which converts it to a 3 at the back hes a lot better fit.2 games? by the Derby game Rudi was playing as a normal lb in defence hence him being in a left position when he played that awful back pass
He didn't drop to left back in those games either, he played as a wide cb who overlapped much like Chris Wilders used to when they had O'Connell and Basham.My point being is that formations aren’t static, Binks isn’t the model Leftback but in a tactic which converts it to a 3 at the back hes a lot better fit.
Robins last tactic was a back three on paper but morphed in defence to a 4-4-2, when does a tactic become a three at the back in attack or in defence or in transition?
The CB is going to be someone from a higher division who isn’t getting game time really. Anyone that fits the bill we might go after?
Not higher division, is getting game time, but I wonder whether Liam Cooper could be tempted. No idea how fit he is nowadays as he seems to have only played half the games in the last 4 seasons but unsure whether that was because of fitness or ability.
Tactically agile doesn’t mean swapping formations every few minutes.
Liverpool and Arsenal have tactically capable managers but their formation rarely alters. How they set up within that formation is the thing that tends to alter, how they tweak the personnel to address the opposition, using subs for game management etc.
Pep is the outlier who is much more flexible with his formations.
Managers / Head coaches tend to have a football philosophy and a preferred formation and they take that to reach club they go to.I never said it did, but it certainly does not mean rigidly sticking to something that worked once with a different set of players.
Liverpools formation changes loads, TAA steps in to CM from RBTactically agile doesn’t mean swapping formations every few minutes.
Liverpool and Arsenal have tactically capable managers but their formation rarely alters. How they set up within that formation is the thing that tends to alter, how they tweak the personnel to address the opposition, using subs for game management etc.
Pep is the outlier who is much more flexible with his formations.
Nope. The formation doesn’t change, how they deploy it changes.Liverpools formation changes loads, TAA steps in to CM from RB
Arsenal do the same but with the LB
A change of position within an established formation.Inside Liverpool’s Tactical Shift: Arne Slot’s 3-4-4 Formation Explained
Read this news on OneFootball.onefootball.com
He's a piece on how Slot likes his players to change position mid gae depending on situations
it's a change of formation, it clearly says soA change of position within an established formation.
you really have no clue what we are talking aboutNope. The formation doesn’t change, how they deploy it changes.
Liverpool play 4 at the back, they don’t fluctuate. How they utilise that 4 does change depending on the opposition.
Nope. The formation doesn’t change, how they deploy it changes.
Liverpool play 4 at the back, they don’t fluctuate. How they utilise that 4 does change depending on the opposition.
It’s a little too complex for you I would imagine.The formation doesn't change just the positions of the individual players
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?