Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
No £3m I'd imagine they would accept. Do you agree that defenders go for less than strikers?
No £3m I'd imagine they would accept. Do you agree that defenders go for less than strikers?Is he better than Hyam? Do you seriously think they’d sell for £1.5m?
I tried arguing this to no avail . A token fee plus add onsBecause he is no use to them in the Premier League.
Nice to see him holding up a City scarf .
Generally although that FB went to the Vile for about £16m.No £3m I'd imagine they would accept. Do you agree that defenders go for less than strikers?
If McNally is worth north of £4m then theres no way that Hamer isnt worth more than £10m.
Because he is no use to them in the Premier League.
No £3m I'd imagine they would accept. Do you agree that defenders go for less than strikers?
So clubs who get promoted have a fire sale of players no use to them? Really?
He was on international duty then wasn’t he? Explains the delay.I like in his interview how he let it slip that he was excited when the fixtures came out which was weeks ago, yet apparently only signed today
I would think if Villa sold Cameron Archer he would attract a higher fee than Doyle.I would think if Man City sold Doyle he’d attract a higher fee than Simms
So why sell him at a loss when they could just loan him out to the Championship again and build his value more if he has another good season? There is zero incentive for them to sell him at a loss, or even for the same money they paid for him.Because he is no use to them in the Premier League.
What does that have to do with the intrinsic value of the player? He was bought a year ago as an unproven from league one for ~£2m, he has since proven himself at Championship level and some people are quoting £1.5m, this isn't reality. Minimum £2.5-£3m upfront plus add ons.Because he is no use to them in the Premier League.
It might mean the likelihood of them being surplus to requirements is increased but it will have zero impact on the fee they will attract. In an open market, value is determined by the market interest, not because they are now premier league and feeling charitable.Within reason yes. But not what’s being suggested. They’ll be going for the same or more as there is even less reason to sell.
Why not? Hamer's value has gone up £5m+ since January.£1.6m was the fee quoted, £2m was likely with add ons. He’s failed to get in the team, he’s not suddenly worth twice as much six months later after a loan.
Why not? Hamer's value has gone up £5m+ since January.
Sent from my SM-G990B using Tapatalk
Well if it has I’d leave it and spend elsewhere. I think we can get better for the money above £3M.
Where from?
McnallyQuestion: If there’s a choice between McNally or getting Hyam back who would you go for ?
McNally and it’s not particularly close.Question: If there’s a choice between McNally or getting Hyam back who would you go for ?
Question: If there’s a choice between McNally or getting Hyam back who would you go for ?
I think Hyam produced some top class performances in his last season with us but Mcnally is a better, more consistent player. So Mcnally.Question: If there’s a choice between McNally or getting Hyam back who would you go for ?
He's IrishEurope mostly, L1 possibly. There’s a premium on English players and while I like a McNally I don’t think he was that good. If we’re buying him for the central role I think we can get better. If we’re buying him for RCB I think you can get prospects for cheaper.
McNally was better of the two for us as a right sided centre half, but as a possible replacement for Fadz in the central role then Hyam would have been a better option,
He’s perfect for the middle IMO. Great aerially to deal with crosses from both sides. Pace to cover both CBs on his sides. Not amazing on the ball, but good enough to move the ball side to side to shift the opposition shape.Not sure McNally has the physical and tactical presence I’d want from my CB as a Fadz replacement. Really lends itself to someone experienced. But maybe I’ve just got Fadz blinkers on.
He’s perfect for the middle IMO. Great aerially to deal with crosses from both sides. Pace to cover both CBs on his sides. Not amazing on the ball, but good enough to move the ball side to side to shift the opposition shape.
Feels like a natural successor to Fadz
Intrigued why you think that?
Gotcha, fair arguments.As Shmmee has commented McNally was part of the defence that fell apart in Fadz's absence last season. Although he was otherwise excellent for us in the right centre back position, I think Hyam is physically stronger of the two and therefore much more suited to a central role.
Its pretty much a redundant argument though as Fadz will start the season, so neither McNally or Hyam will be signed to sit on the bench waiting for his performance levels to fade.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?